Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 7, 2018
Accepted
February 27, 2019
Published
March 24, 2019
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 253 Download : 146

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the income of wetland paddy farming on the affected land and not affected by nickel in the South Konawe Discrit . This study was conducted from May to July 2017. The data collected were primary data obtained from direct interviews with affected wetland farmers and not affected nickel mining, with the number of respondents as many as 100 farmers. Data were analyzed using farm income analysis. The results showed that the income of rice field farming exposed and not affected by nickel mining is significantly different. Total revenues of rice field farms affected by mining nickel mining amounted to Rp7 838 617 with a     R/C of 0.9 and total revenues of Rp -213 290.4. Meanwhile, the acceptance of paddy field farming is not affected by nickel mining which is Rp17 220 630.3 with R/C value of 1.9 and revenues at total cost Rp 6 897 157.4.

Keywords

Mining affected rice farming analysis revenue.

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Hasriati, H., Tinaprilla, N., & Suprehatin, S. (2019). ANALISIS PENDAPATAN USAHATANI PADI SAWAH TERKENA DAMPAK PERTAMBANGAN NIKEL DI KABUPATEN KONAWE SELATAN. Jurnal AGRISEP: Kajian Masalah Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian Dan Agribisnis, 18(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.31186/jagrisep.18.1.53-60
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. Produktivitas padi di IndonesiaTahun 2011-2015.http://bps.go.id [diacu 10 Juli2018].
  2. [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. Produksi padi sawah Kabupaten Konawe Selatan Tahun 2011-2015. http://bps.go.id[diacu 10 Juli2018].
  3. [ESDM] Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. 2015. Dampak Pembangunan Smelter di Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. Jakarta (ID): Pusat Data Dan Teknologi Informasi Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral.
  4. Pitojo, S. 2000. Budi Daya Padi Sawah Tabela. Jakarta (ID): Penebar Swadaya.
  5. Silamat, Eddy, Yuwana dan M. Zulkarnain Yuliarso. 2014. Analisis Produktivitas Usahatani Padi Sawah Dengan Menggunakan Traktor Tangan Dan Cara Konvensional Di Kabupaten Rejang Lebong. AGRISEP 13(2): 197-212
  6. Soekartawi. 2002. Teori Produksi dengan Pokok Bahasan Analisis Fungsi Cobb-Douglas. Jakarta (ID): PT Raja Grafindo.
  7. Suparmoko, M. 2006. Panduan dan Valuasi Ekonomi Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Konsep, Metode Penghitungan dan Aplikasi). Yogyakarta (ID): BPFE.
  8. Tsaputra, Harry; Bambang Sumantri, Agus Purwoko. 2012. Analisis Efisiensi Usahatani Padi Sawah: Kasus Pada Petani Pengguna Handtraktor Di Kelurahan Kemumu, Kecamatan Argamakmur, Kabupaten Bengkulu Utara. AGRISEP 11(2): 145-152