Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to reveal, implement, achieve success and the obstacles that affect the success of the tiered training program at the basic level of Early Childhood Educators who have high school qualifications and SI are not  the PAUD field in Lebong Regency SPNF (SKB). This research is an evaluation research using Context, Input, Process, Product. The subject of this study was a level-level tiered training participant. Data collection is done by interview method, documentation, and observation. Furthermore, the data obtained were analyzed using analysis at Lebong Regency SPNF (SKB) to obtain data validity, expert discussion, and extension of observation. The results of the study are as follows, context aspect shows the suitability between training participants' needs and participation, training parti1 cipants' experience, and environmental conditions with training program activities, input aspects indicate training participants' motivation, training participant characteristics, resource characteristics, funding, and infrastructure in the category Good, the process aspect shows the training participants' activities, learning strategies and interpersonal relationships are also in good categories. Product aspects show that all levels of basic education and training activities can be implemented well. The success of the basic level education and training program is shown by the improvement in the minimum competence of PAUD educators which includes understanding tasks and authority in assisting educators and accompanying educators. Constraints in the implementation of the training program include less than optimal cooperation, and the media and teaching aids cannot function optimally.

Keywords

Program Evaluation of Tiered Tiud Training

Article Details

How to Cite
Handayani, R., & Turdjai, T. (2021). EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS IN A PAUD CLASSROOM (Study on Lebong Regency SPNF (SKB). Diadik: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Pendidikan, 9(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.33369/diadik.v9i1.17956

References

  1. Arikunto, S. Jabar, C, (2010), Evaluasi Program Pendidikan, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  2. Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Abdul Jabar, Cepi Safrudin (2008). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  3. Ahmad,Sabri.(2007).Strategi Belajar Mengajar Mikro Teaaching. Ciputat : Quantum.
  4. Djaali & Pudji Muljono. (2008). Pengukuran Dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.
  5. Defhutbun dan ITT. (2000). Modul Pelatihan: Pelatihan Desain Pelatihan. Bogor. Departemen Kehutanan dan Perkebunan dan Internasional Tropical Timber Organization.
  6. Handoko dan Reksohadiprodjo, (2001), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia dan Perusahaan, Edisi Kedua, BPFE, Yogyakarta.
  7. Hermansyah dan Azahari. (2002). ”Identifikasi kebutuhan diklat”, Bahan Ajar Diklat Kewidysiswaraan Tingkat Pertama. Jakarta :LAN
  8. Haris, Herdiansyah. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
  9. https://studylibid.com/doc/1152777/ Manajemen-Diklat- Berjenjang-Tingkat-Dasar-Untuk-meningkatkan. Diakses tanggal 1 April 2019
  10. Fadillah, Muhamad .(2012). Desain Pembelajaran Paud.Jogjakarta: Ar Ruzz Media
  11. John M. Echols dan Hassan Shadily. (2000). Kamus Inggris Indonesia An EnglishIndonesia Dictionary. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia.
  12. John M. Echols dan Hassan Shadily, Kamus Inggris- Indonesia, Gramedia, Jakarta, 1983.
  13. Kartika Putri,(2016). Evaluasi Program Dikla Tberjenjeng Tingkat Dasar Pendidikan Paud. madiun : S2 TESIS
  14. Lababa, Djunaidi. (2008). Evaluasi Program : sebuah pengantar. 01 Maret 2010
  15. Latif, Mukhtar. Dkk. (2013). Orientasi Baru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jakarta: Kencana
  16. Marzuki Ahmad.2011.Study Evaluasi Kinerja Guru Yang Bersertifikasi Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran. Bengkulu:Univ ersitas Bengkulu.
  17. Mulyatiningsih.(2011).metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
  18. Mulyasa, E. (2007). Menjadi Guru Profesional Menciptakan Pembelajaran Kreatif Dan Menyenangkan. Bandung : Rosdakarya.
  19. Panduan Penyelenggara Program Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Diklat Berjenjang Tingkat Dasar,(2005).BP PAUDNI Regional IV.Mataram
  20. Sudjana, Nana & Ibrahim. (2004). Penelitian Dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung:Sinar Baru Algesindo
  21. Soetjipto & Kosasi. (1994). Proyek Pembinaan danPeningkatan Mutu Tenaga.
  22. Tri Darma Bakti. (2016).Evaluasi Program Diklat PAUD Berjenjang di Kabupaten Lebong.
  23. Tayibnavis. (2000). Evaluasi Program Jakarta : Rineka cipta
  24. Yusuf.(2015). Aseemen dan Evaluasi Pendidikan.Jakarta:Premedia Group.