Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 21, 2021
Accepted
October 21, 2021
Published
October 21, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 101 Download : 143

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the the correlation among learning styles, attitudes toward mathematics and mathematics learning achievements of the eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Pagar Alam. This research is a quantitative study with a correlational method. The population of this study were students of class VIII SMP Negeri 2 Pagar Alam, through proportional stratified random sampling. The research instrument used in the form of a learning style questionnaire, attitude questionnaire towards Mathematics subjects and documentation of student learning achievement. The data analysis technique used to test the correlation between variables X1 to Y and X2 to Y is partial correlation analysis, to test the correlation of X1, X2 to Y, multiple regression analysis is used. The results showed that there was a significant relationship between learning styles and attitudes towards mathematics subjects simultaneously on mathematics learning achievement. A significance score of 0.016 is lower than 0.05. This means that Ha is accepted, while Ho is rejected, so it can be concluded that the right learning style will improve students' Mathematics learning achievement followed by high attitudes towards Mathematics subjects. The more precise the student's learning style that is applied plus a positive attitude towards Mathematics subjects, the more optimal the Mathematics learning achievement will be

Keywords

learning style attitudes towards mathematics subjects learning achievement

Article Details

License

 

 

How to Cite
Idaliyah, T. (2021). HUBUNGAN GAYA BELAJAR DAN SIKAP TERHADAP MATA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 2 PAGAR ALAM. Diadik: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Pendidikan, 11(2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.33369/diadik.v11i2.18522
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdurrahman, Mulyono. 2009. Pendididkan Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
  2. Ahmadi Abu dan Widodo Supriyono. 2004. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
  3. Anonim, “Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Gaya Belajar”, http://Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Gaya Belajar_Wawasan Pendidikan.htm,diakses pada 28 September 2015.
  4. Arifin, Zainal. 1991. Evaluasi Instruksional. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya
  5. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  6. . 2013. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta
  7. Azwar Saifudin. 1988. Sikap Manusia, Teori, dan Pengukurannya. Seri psikologi. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
  8. Azwar Saifudin. 1995. Sikap Manusia: Teori dan Pengukurannya Edisi Kedua. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
  9. De Porter, Bobby dan Hernacki, Mike. 2004. Quantum Learning. Jakarta: Kaifa
  10. Depdiknas. 2001. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka
  11. Dianingsih Elisabet Resti. 2019. Hubungan antara Sikap Siswa Terhadap Matematika Dengan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII Semester I di SMP Pangudi Luhur Wedi Tahun Ajaran 2018/2019. Yogyakarta: Skripsi Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta.
  12. Dryden, Gordon dan J. V. 2001. Revolusi Cara Belajar (The Learning Revolution) Belajar akan Efektif kalau Anda Belajar dalam Keadaan “Fun”. (Alih bahasa: Word ++ Translation Service). Jakarta: KAIFA.
  13. Ebbutt, S. & Straker, A. 1995. Mathematics in Primary Schools Part I: Children and Mathematics. London: Collins Educational Publisher Ltd.
  14. Gunawan. Adi W. 2004. Genius Learning Strategy. Jakarta: PT. Ikrar Mandiriabadi.
  15. Khoeron. 2014. Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Mata Pelajaran Produktif di SMK Negeri 8 Kota Bandung. Dari https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jmee/article/view/3816
  16. Prashnig, Barbara. 1998. The Power Of Learning Styles: Memacu Anak Melejitkan Prestasi Dengan Mengenali Gaya Belajarnya. Bandung: Mizan Pustaka..
  17. Press. Esti, Sri. 2006. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo.
  18. Purwanto. 2010. Evaluasi Hasil belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  19. Rita Eka Izzati. 2008. Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
  20. Sears, D, O., Freedman, J, L., & Peplau, L, A. 1985. Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
  21. Sugiyono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  22. . 2007. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  23. . 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Afabeta
  24. Surya Mohammad. 2004. Psikologi Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran. Bandung: Pustaka Bani Quraisy
  25. Umar, Husein. 2010. Desain Penelitian MSDM dan Perilaku Karyawan: Paradigma Positivistik dan Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  26. Webster’s New Internasional Dictionary. 1951
  27. Zhanariah dan Bashah. 2009. Satu Pemerhatian terhadap Gaya Pembelajaran Murid Sekolah Rendah dan Menengah di Lembah Kelang. Diakses dari http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://3.bp.blogspot.com/furl=http://bhasahabubakar.blogspot.com/2009/05/satupemerhatianterhadapgaya.html. Pada tanggal 17 Januari 2013, jam 09.23 WIB