Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between corporate social performance and financial performance. In addition, this study also aims to examine corporate social responsibility disclosure as a moderating variable the relationship between corporate social performance and financial performance of banking companies in Indonesia. The sample consisted of 35 listed bank in Indonesia Stock Exchange. The results of the study showed that the corporate social responsibility performance negatively effect financial performance. This means that the higher the cost of corporate social responsibility, the lower the company's financial performance. In testing the effect of moderating variable, the results of this study does not provide evidence that the corporate social responsibility disclosure as a moderating variable relationship between corporate social performance and financial performance. However, other results in this study showed that as the independent variable, the corporate social responsibility disclosure positively effect on financial performance, which means that the more items that disclosed the company, the higher the company's financial performance

Keywords

CSR disclosure CSR performance firm performance

Article Details

Author Biography

Nilhasanah Nilhasanah, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Bengkulu




How to Cite
Nilhasanah, N. (2018). CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DAN KINERJA BANK TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 7(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v7i3.15187

References

  1. Ahmad, N., Maliah, and D. Siswantoro. 2003. “Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in Malaysia: An Analysis of Annual Reports of KLSE Listed Companies”. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management Malaysia 11 (1). The International Islamic University.
  2. Ahmad, N.N.N., dan Sulaiman, M. 2004. “Environmental Disclosures in Malaysian Annual Reports: A Legitimacy Theory Perspective”. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 14, 44.
  3. Ahmar dan Kurniawan, 2007. “Analisis Profitabilitas Sebelum dan Sesudah Pemenuhan Corporate Governance pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Go Public di Bursa Efek Jakarta”. Jurnal MAKSI. Vol 7 No 3, Agustus.
  4. Balabanis, G., Phillips, H. C., & Lyall, J. 1998. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Economic Performance in the Top British Companies: Are They Linked?”. European Business Review, 98(1), p. 25-44.
  5. Baron, J. B., & Kenny, D. 1986. “The Moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  6. Bassamalah, Anies S., dan Johnny Jermias. 2005. “Social and Environmental Reporting and Auditing in Indonesia: Mainteining Organizational Legitimacy?”. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business. Januari-April Vol. 7 No. 1. pp:109 – 127.
  7. Bayoud, N. S., Kavanagh, M., & Slaughter, G. 2012. “An Emirical Study of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Libya”. International Journal of management and marketing Research, 5(3).
  8. Berman S. L., Wicks A. C., Kotha S., & Jones T. M. 1999. “Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance”. Academy of Management Journal, No. 5.
  9. Boaventura, J. M. G., Silva, R. S. da, & Bandeira-de-Mello, R. 2012. “Corporate Financial Performance and Corporate Social Performance: Methodological Development and the Theoretical Contribution of Empirical Studies”. Revista Contabilidade & Financas, 23(60), 232–245.
  10. Brammer, S., C. Brooks and S. Pavelin. 2006. “Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures”. Financial Management, 35(3), 97–116.
  11. Brigham dan Houston. 2006. Dasar-dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.
  12. Budiarsi, Sri Yunan. 2005. “Corporate Sustainability: Melalui Pendekatan Corporate Social Responsibility”. Media Ekonomi, Tahun XV, No.2, 115-135.
  13. Budiarsi, Sri Yunan. 2008. “Sisi Lain Etika Bisnis Green Manajemen, Etis atau Startegis”. The 2nd National Conference UKWMS Surabaya, 6 September 2008.
  14. Buhr, N. 1998. “Environmental Performance, Legislation and Annual Report Disclosure: The Case of Acid Rain and Falconbridge”. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(2), 163-190.
  15. Carroll, A. B. 1979. “A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance”. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
  16. Cochran, Philip dan Wood, Robert A. 1984. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Performance”. The Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 27 No 1.
  17. Dahlsrud, Alexander. 2008. “How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definition”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1-13.
  18. Dajan, Anto. 1996. Pengantar Metode Statistik Jilid II. Cetakan kedepalan 18. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka P3ES.
  19. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. 1975. “Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior”. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-36.
  20. Dusuki, Asyraf Wajdi and Dar, Humayon. 2005. “Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility of Islamic banks: Evidence From malaysian Economy”. A Paper Presented in Islamic Economics and Banking in The 21st century. 6 th International Conference on Islamic Economics and Finance. Jakarta Indonesia, November 21-24, 2005.
  21. Fauzi, Hasan. 2004. “Identifying and Analyzing The Level of Peratices of Company’s Social Responsibility in Improving Financial Performances”. Jurnal Bisnis & Manajemen, 4(2), 150–170.
  22. Finch, Nigel. 2005. “The Motivations for Adopting Sustainability Disclosure. Macquaarie Graduate School of Management”. Social Science Research Network.
  23. Fitriyani. 2012. “Keterkaitan Kinerja Lingkungan, Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), dan Kinerja Financial”. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/35522/1/Skripsi_30.pdf
  24. Freeman, R. E. 1994. “The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.
  25. Fuad, M., et al. 2000. Pengantar Bisnis. Jakarta: PT. Garmedia Pustaka Utama.
  26. Ghozali, Imam. 2013. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS, Edisi Ketujuh. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  27. Ghozali, Imam dan Chariri, Anis. 2007. Teori Akuntansi, Edisi Ketiga. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  28. Gössling, T., & Vocht, C. 2007. “Social Role Conceptions and CSR Policy Success”. Journal of Business Ethics, 47 (4), p. 363-372.