Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to examine whether internal corporate governance (the proportion of independence commissioners, board size, independence of audit committees, audit committee financial expertise, audit committee meetings, and audit committee membership) affect the timeliness of financial reporting. This study uses a quantitative approach. Methods of data collection using purposive sampling method. The object of this research is publicly traded non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2015- 2019 period. The timeliness of financial reporting is measured by Audit Report Lag (ARL) and Management Report Lag (MRL). The data obtained in this study were as many as 113 sample companies. The data analysis method of this research is multiple linear regression. The results of the Audit Lag Report shows that the proportion of independent commissioners, audit committee financial expertise, and audit committee meetings affect the Audit Lag report while the size of the board of commissioners, independent audit committee, and audit committee membership has no effect on the Audit Lag Report. In contrast to the results of Management Report Lag shows that independent audit committees and audit committee meetings affect Management Lag Reports while the proportion of independent commissioners, board size, audit committee financial expertise, and audit committee membership has no effect on Lag Management Reports.

Keywords

Proportion of Independent Commissioners Board of Commissioners Size Audit Committee Independence Audit Committee Financial Expertise Audit Committee Meetings and Audit Committee Membership

Article Details

How to Cite
Rizki, R., Husaini, H., & P Midiastuty, P. (2021). CORPORATE GOVERNANCE INTERNAL DAN KETEPATAN WAKTU LAPORAN KEUANGAN PERUSAHAAN NON KEUANGAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 10(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v10i2.15259

References

  1. Abbot, L. J., S. P. dan G. F. P. 2004. Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements. Accounting: A Journal of Practice and
  2. Theory, 69–87.
  3. Afify, H. 2009. Does Implementing Corporate Governance Have Any Impact? Empirical Evidence from Egypt. Journal of
  4. Applied Accounting Research, 55–86. Akal, M. N. 2014. Corporate Governance. 1–162. online
  5. Aljaaidi, K. S., Ghassan Saeed Bagulaidah, Noor Azizi Ismail, & Faudziah Hanim Fadzil. 2015. An Empirical Invistigation Of
  6. Determinants Associated With Audit Report Lag In Jordan. Jordan Journal of Business Administration, 11(4).
  7. https://doi.org/10.35516/0338-011-004-009
  8. Apadore, K., & Mohd Noor, M. 2013. Determinants of Audit Report Lag and Corporate Governance in Malaysia. International
  9. Journal of Business and Management, 8(15), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n15p151
  10. Astuti, C. D. 2007. Faktor Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Ketepatan Waktu Pelaporan Keuangan. Jurnal Informasi,
  11. Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik, 2(1), 27– 42.
  12. Cadbury, A. 2000. Family Firms and their Governance Creating Tomorrow’s Company from Today’s by Sir Adrian Cadbury. 34.
  13. Chambers, A. E., & and Stephen H. Pennman. 1984. The Timeliness of Reporting and The Stock Price Reaction to Earnings
  14. Announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, s22 No.1 Sp.
  15. Daoud, K. A. Al, Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail, & Lode, N. A. 2015. The impact of internal corporate governance on the timeliness of
  16. financial reports of jordanian firms: Evidence using audit and management report lags. Mediterranean Journal of Social
  17. Sciences, 6(1), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1p430
  18. Dimitropoulos, P. E., & Asteriou, D. 2010. The effect of board composition on the informativeness and quality of annual
  19. earnings: Empirical evidence from Greece. Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, 24(2), 190–205.
  20. Dyer, J. C., & McHugh, A. J. 1975. The Timeliness of the Australian Annual Report times. Journal of Accounting Research,
  21. (2), 204–219.
  22. Effendi, M. A. 2017. The Power of Corporate Governance, Teori dan Implementasi. Salemba Empat.
  23. FCGI. 2002. Peranan Dewan Komisaris dan Komite Audit dalam Pelaksanaan Corporate Governance ( Tata Kelola Perusahaan
  24. ). Seri Tata Kelola Perusahaan (Corporate Governance), II (2002), 37. Jakarta
  25. Felo, A. J., Krishnamurthy, S., & Solieri, S. A. 2003. Audit Committee Characteristics and the Perceived Quality of Financial
  26. Reporting: An Empirical Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.401240
  27. Gunarsih, T., & Hartadi, B. 2008. Struktur Corporate Governance dan Ketetapan Waktu Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan.
  28. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 12(2), 204–216.
  29. Ghozali, I. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Unversitas Diponegoro.
  30. Gregory, R. H., & Van Horn. 1963. Automatic Data - Processing Systems: Principles and Procedures (2nd ed.).
  31. Wadsworth Publisghing Company, Inc. Hamdani. 2016. Good Corporate Governance Tinjauan Etika dalam Praktik Bisnis.
  32. Mitra Wacana Media.
  33. Husaini. 2009. Komite Audit dan Audit Internal: Integritas Pengawasan Korporasi. UNPAD PRESS. IAI. 2007. Standar
  34. Akuntansi Keuangan. Salemba Empat. IAI. 2009. Standar Profesi Akuntan Publik. Salemba Empat. Komite Nasional
  35. Kebijakan Governance. 2006. Task Force KNCGI. Jakarta
  36. Lestari, N. L. K. A. S., & Latrini, M. Y. 2018. Pengaruh Fee Audit, Ukuran Perusahaan Klien, Ukuran KAP, dan Opini Auditor
  37. Pada Audit Delay. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 24, 422. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2018.v24.i01.p16
  38. Maria, G. T. 2015. The Role Of Cooperative Learning Type Team Assisted Individualization To Improve The Students
  39. Mathematics Communication Ability In The Subject Of Probability Theory. 32 (6)(ISBN:2222-228X), 27–32.
  40. Mark, Y. T., & Li, Y. 2001. Determinants of Corporate Ownership and Board Structure: Evidence from Singapore. Journal of
  41. Corporate Finance, 7, 236–256.
  42. McMullen, D. A. 1996. Audit Committee Performance: An Investigation of the Consequences Associated with Audit Commites.
  43. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15, 88–103.
  44. Naimi, M. 2010. Corporate Governance and Audit Report Lag in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of
  45. Accounting, 6(2), 57–84.
  46. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. 2016. Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor
  47. /POJK.04/2016 Tentang Laporan Tahunan Emiten atau Perusahaan Publik. 1–29.
  48. Owusuh, & Ansah S. 2000. Timeliness of Corporate Financial Reporting in Emerging Capital Market: Empirical Evidence from
  49. the Caital Zimbabwe Stock Exchange. The Accounting and Business Research, Summer, 241–254.
  50. Purwati, A. S. 2006. Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit Terhadap Ketepatan Waktu Pelaporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan
  51. Publik Yang Tercatat Di Bej. Tesis.
  52. Rachmawati, S. 2008. Pengaruh Faktor Internal Dan Eksternal Perusahaan Terhadap Audit Delay Dan Timeliness. Pengaruh
  53. Faktor Internal Dan Eksternal Perusahaan Terhadap Audit Delay Dan Timeliness, 10(1), 1–10.
  54. Salleh, Z., Saeed Rabea Batwaah, & Norsiah Ahmad. 2017. Audit Committee Financial Expertise and Audit Report Lag:
  55. Malaysia Further Insight. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 8, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.17576/ajag-2017-
  56. -12
  57. Savitri, R. 2010. Pengaruh Mekanisme Corporate Governance Terhadap Ketepatan Waktu Pelaporan Keuangan: Studi pada
  58. Perusahaan Manufaktur di BEI. Skripsi, 1–154.
  59. Shukeri, S. N., & Islam, M. A. 2012. The determinants of audit timeliness: Evidence from malaysia. Journal of Applied
  60. Sciences Research, 8(7), 3314–3322.
  61. Siswanto, S., & Aldrige, E. . 2005. Good Corporate Governance : Tata Kelola Perusahaan yang Sehat. Damar Media Pustaka.
  62. Supomo, B., & Indriantoro, N. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis (Cetakan Ke). BFEE UGM.
  63. Wahyuni, N. 2018. Pengaruh Profitabilitas, likuiditas, struktur kepemilikan, dan firm size terhadap ketepatan waktu pelaporan
  64. keuangan. 160–164.
  65. Wardhani, A. P. 2013. Analisis Pengaruh Corporate Governance Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Analisis Pengaruh Corporate
  66. Governance Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan, 2.
  67. Wijaya, A. T. 2012. Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit Terhadap Audit Report Lag. In Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit
  68. Terhadap Audit Report Lag (Issue Skripsi). Universitas Diponegoro.
  69. Xie, B.Davidson, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the
  70. audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295–316.
  71. Zaitul. 2010. Board of Directors, audit committee, auditor characteristics and the timeli