Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 1, 2021
Accepted
April 1, 2021
Published
April 1, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 76 Download : 275

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between the level of competition between banks and revenue diversification on financial stability of commercial banks during 2008- 2013. The level of competition in this study measured by the market share of net interest income. Revenue diversification measured using Hirscman Herfindhal Index, while the bank's financial stability is measured by ZScore for banking industry. Models were analyzed using a fixed effect regression models. The results showed that the bank samples is vurnerable to the intense of competition. Although the research sample has relatively high market share, but its has not shown the resilience to face the competition. Low level of revenue diversification on bank samples showed that they did not implement a diversification strategy, then can not gain benefit from revenue diversification strategy

Keywords

Level of Competition Revenue Diversification Z Score Financial Stability

Article Details

How to Cite
Nova, N. (2021). TINJAUAN STABILITAS KEUANGAN BANK MELALUI TINGKAT PERSAINGAN DAN DIVERSIFIKASI PENDAPATAN: STUDI PADA BANK UMUM YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 5(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v5i3.15314
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Andries, Alin Marius, Bogdan Capraru. (2013). The nexus between competition and
  2. efficiency: The European banking industries experience. International Business
  3. Review.www.elsevier.com
  4. Amel D., Barnes C., Panetta F. ,Salleo C. (2004). Consolidation and efficiency in the
  5. financial sector: A review of the international evidence 1. Journal of Banking &
  6. Finance; Vol. 28: 2493-2519.
  7. Amidu, Mohammed , Simon Wolfe. (2013). Does bank competition and diversification lead
  8. to greater stability? Evidence from emerging markets.Review of Development
  9. Finance 3 152–166
  10. Amihud, Y., Lev, B., (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate
  11. mergers.Bell Journal of Economics 12, 605–617.
  12. Baghdasaryan, Delia,1, Lisbeth la Cour. (2013). Competition, ownership and productivity.A
  13. panel analysis of Czech firms.Journal of Economics and Business 69. 86– 100
  14. Berger, Allen N, Iftekhar Hasan, Mingming Zhou. (2010). The effects of focus versus
  15. diversification on bank performance: Evidence from Chinese banks. Journal of
  16. Banking & Finance 34, 1417–1435.
  17. Berger, A. (1995). The profit-structure relationship in banking — Tests of market-power
  18. and efficient-structure hypotheses. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 27, 404–
  20. Berger, A.N., DeYoung, R., Genay, H., Udell, G.F., (2000). Globalization of financial
  21. institutions: evidence from cross-border banking performance. Brookings- Wharton
  22. Paper on Financial Services 3, 23–158.
  23. Boot, A., Schmeits, A., (2000).Market discipline and incentive problems in conglomerate
  24. firms with applications to banking.Journal of Financial Intermediation 9, 240–273.
  25. Bredenlöw T, Zineldin M. (2001). Performance measurement and management control
  26. positioning strategies, quality and productivity: a case study of a Swedish bank.
  27. Managerial Auditing Journal; Vol. 16: 484-499.
  28. Cerasi, Vittoria, Sonja Daltung. (2000). The optimal size of a bank: Costs and benefits of
  29. diversification. European Economic Review 44. 1701}1726
  30. Chen, Chiung-Jung, Chwo-Ming Joseph Yu. (2012). Managerial ownership, diversification,
  31. and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market. International Business
  32. Review 21. 518–534
  33. Chong, Terence Tai-Leung, Liping Lu, Steven Ongena. (2013). Does banking competition
  34. alleviate or worsen credit constraints faced by small- and medium-sized enterprises?
  35. Evidence from China.Journal of Banking & Finance 37. 3412–3424
  36. Copeland, Thomas E, J. Fred Weston and Kuldeep Shastri. (2005). Financial Theory and
  37. Corporate Policy Fourth Edition. Pearson.
  38. Cipollini, Andrea, Franco Fiordelisi. (2012). Economic value, competition and financial
  39. distress in the European banking system.Journal of Banking & Finance 36. 3101–
  41. Craig, James C. and Robert M. Grant. (1993), Strategic Management, Kogan Page Limited,
  42. London
  43. Delis, Manthos D. (2012). Bank competition, financial reform, and institutions: The
  44. importance of being developed. Journal of Development Economics 97. 450–465
  45. Deng, S., Elyasiani, E., (2008). Geographic diversification and BHC return and risk
  46. performance. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40, 1217–1238.
  47. Drucker, S., Puri, M., (2009). On loan sales, loan contracting, and lending relationships.
  48. Review of Financial Studies 22, 2835–2872.
  49. Engle, Robert F, Moshirian Fariborz, Sahgal Sidharth Zhang, Bohui. (2014). Banks NonInterest Income and Global Financial Stability.CIFR Paper No. 015/2014. Available
  50. at SSRN:http://ssrn.com/abstract=2443181
  51. Estes, Kathy. (2014). Diversification and Community Bank Performance during a Financial
  52. Crisis.International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies. Vol.3 No.4,
  53. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1994).Production frontiers. Cambridge:
  54. Cambridge University Press.
  55. Fiordelisi, F and D.S. Mare. (2013). Probability of default and efficiency in cooperative
  56. banking, Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money, 26, pp.
  57. –45
  58. Fiorentino E., De Vincenzo A., Heid F., Karmann A. ,Koetter M. (2009). The effects of
  59. privatization and consolidation on bank productivity: comparative evidence from
  60. Italy and Germany, Deutsche Bundesbank.
  61. Fu, Xiaoqing (Maggie), Yongjia (Rebecca) Lin, Philip Molyneux. (2014). Bank
  62. competition and financial stability in Asia Pacific.Journal of Banking & Finance 38.
  63. –77
  64. Fungacova, Zuzana, Pierre Pessarossi, Laurent Weill. (2013). Is bank competition
  65. detrimental to efficiency? Evidence from China.China Economic Review 27. 121–
  67. Gujarati, Damodar N. Porter, Dawn C. (2009). Basic Econometrics.5th edition.McGraw Hill.
  68. Iskandar-Datta, M., McLaughlin, R., (2007). Global diversification: new evidence from
  69. corporate operating performance. Corporate Ownership and Control 4, 228–250.
  70. Jensen, M., Meckling, W., (1976). Theory of the "rm: Managerial behavior, agency costs
  71. and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305}360.
  72. Jeon, Jin Q., Kwang Kyu Lim. (2013). Bank competition and financial stability: A
  73. comparison of commercial banks and mutual savings banks in Korea. Pacific-Basin
  74. Finance Journal 25. 253–272
  75. Jonghe, Oliver de.(2010). Back to the basics in banking?A micro-analysis of banking
  76. system stability.Journal of financial intermediation, Volume 19, Issue 3
  77. Klein, P., Saidenberg, M., (1998). Diversification, organization, and efficiency: evidence
  78. from bank holding companies. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
  79. Laeven, L., Levine, R., (2007). Is there a diversification discount in financial
  80. conglomerates? Journal of Financial Economics 85, 331–367.
  81. Lee, Chien-Chiang, Meng-Fen Hsieh, Shih-Jui Yang. (2014). The relationship between
  82. revenue diversification and bank performance: Do financial structures and financial
  83. reforms matter? Japan and the World Economy. 29.18–35
  84. Li, Li, Yu Zhang. (2013). Are there diversification benefits of increasing non interest
  85. income in the Chinese banking industry? Journal of Empirical Finance 24. 151–165
  86. Maksimovic, V., Phillips, G., (2002). Do conglomerate firms allocate resources inefficiently
  87. across industries? Theory and evidence.Journal of Finance 57, 721–767.
  88. Mensi, Sami, Abderrazak Zouari. (2010).Efficient Structure versus Market Power: Theories
  89. and Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Economics and Finance. Vol. 2,
  90. No. 4; November
  91. Mercieca, S., Schaeck, K., Wolfe, S., (2007). Small European banks: benefits from
  92. diversification? Journal of Banking and Finance 31 (7) 1975–1998.
  93. Nguyen, Thi Canh, Dinh Vinh Vo, Van Chien Nguyen. (2015). Risk and Income
  94. Diversification in the VietnameseBanking System.Journal of Applied Finance &
  95. Banking.Vol. 5, No. 1, 93-109.
  96. Nguyen, My, Skully Michael, PereraShrimal (2012). Market
  97. power, revenue diversification and bank stability: evidence from selected south
  98. Asian countries.Journal of international financial markets, institutions and money,
  99. Volume 22, Issue 4.
  100. Ovi, Nafisa Zabeen, Perera Shrimal, Colombage Sisira. (2014). Market power, credit
  101. risk, revenue diversification and bank stability in selected ASEAN countries.South
  102. East Asia research, Volume 22, Issue 3.
  103. Roghanian, Parastoo, Amran Rasli, Hamed Gheysari. (2012). Productivity Through
  104. Effectiveness and Efficiency in the Banking Industry. Procedia-Social and
  105. Behavioral Sciences 40. 550 – 556.
  106. Sanyal, Paroma, Rashmi Shankar. (2011). Ownership, competition, and bank productivity:
  107. An analysis of Indian banking in the post-reform period. International Review of
  108. Economics and Finance 20. 225–247.
  109. Scott, William R. (2012). Financial Accounting Theory.6th edition.Pearson.
  110. Shepherd, W.G. (1986). Tobins’q and the Structure-Performance Relationship: Comment.
  111. The American Economic Review, Vol.76, 5, 1205-1210.
  112. Sianipar, Aryanti S. (2014). diversifikasi pendapatan, pendapatan non-bunga, fee income,
  113. risiko, kinerja bank. Tesis.Manajemen.Universitas Gadjah Mada.
  114. Widarjono, Agus. (2009). Ekonometrika: Pengantar dan Aplikasinya. Ekonisia-Kampus
  115. Fakultas Ekonomi UII.Yogyakarta.
  116. Winarno, Wing Wahyu. (2011). Analisis Ekonometrika dan Statistika dengan EViews.UPP
  117. STIM YKPN. Yogyakarta.
  118. Yigit, Ihsan, Seref Tur. (2012). Relationship Between Diversification Strategy Applications
  119. And Organizational Performance According To Herfindahl Index Criteria. Procedia
  120. - Social and Behavioral Sciences 58. 118 – 127.