Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 1, 2021
Accepted
April 1, 2021
Published
April 1, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 62 Download : 103

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of Economic Value Added (EVA) and Earning per Share (EPS) on stocks return. This research was taken because there are still differences between the research study with each other. This research was conducted using secondary data. Population in this research was a with time company incorporated in the index LQ 45 in Indonesian Stock Exchange period 2013-2014. Sampling technique using was purposive sampling. There are 21 companies to analyzed. This study using multiple regression with panel data. Results shows that Economic Value Added (EVA) have positive significant effect on Stock Return, while Earning Per Share (EPS) also have positive significant on Stock Return. Adjusted R Square value was 0,395091 means 39,50% can explained by the independent variable, while 60,50% are influenced by the other variables which have not been included in the research model.

Keywords

Stocks Return Economic Value Added Earning Per Share Multiple Regression Panel Data

Article Details

How to Cite
Amyulianthy, R., & K.Ritonga, E. (2021). PENGARUH ECONOMIC VALUE ADDED DAN EARNING PER SHARE TERHADAP RETURN SAHAM (PENDEKATAN DATA PANEL). JURNAL FAIRNESS, 5(3), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v5i3.15315
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Biddle, G.C., R. Bowen, and J.S. Wallace (1997), Does EVA Beat Earnings? Evidence on
  2. Associations with Stock Returns and Firm Values, Journal of Accounting and
  3. Economics, Vol.24 No.3.
  4. Brigham, Eugine F, dan Joel F, 2001, Manajemen Keuangan, Jakarta: Erlangga.
  5. Brigham, Eugene F dan Houston. 2006. Fundamental of FinancialManagement: DasarDasar Manajemen Keuangan. Edisi 10. Jakarta: Salemba Empat
  6. Campbell, John Y. 1987. Stock returns and the term structure. Journal of Financial
  7. Economics 18, no. 2: 373-399.
  8. Campbell, J.Y., 1993. Intertemporal asset pricing without consumption data. Am. Econ.
  9. Rev. 83 (3), 487–512.
  10. Campbell, J.Y., 1996. Understanding risk and return. J. Polit. Econ. 104, 29.
  11. Campbell, J.Y and Samuel B. Thompson, “Predicting Excess Stock Returns out of Sample:
  12. Can Anything Beat the Historical Average?”The Review of Financial StudiesVol.
  13. , No. 4 (Jul., 2008), pp. 1509-1531.
  14. Cerlienia. 2010. The Effect of ROA, ROE, DER, EPS dan PER terhadap to Return Saham.
  15. Journal Of Accounting. Hal: 5-7.
  16. Chen, S. and Dodd, J.L. (1997), Economic Value Added (EVA): an empirical examination
  17. of a new corporate performance measure, Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. IX,
  18. Fall, pp. 318-330.
  19. Darmadji, Tjiptono and Hendy, M. Fakhruddin. 2011. Pasar Modal di Indonesia. Jakarta:
  20. Salemba Empat.
  21. DeVilliers, J.U. and Auret, C.J. (1997), A comparison of EPS and EVA as explanatory
  22. variables for share price, Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Vol.
  23. , August, pp. 47-63.
  24. Dewanto, H. 2005. Analisis Pengaruh Economic Value Added, Market Value Added,
  25. Residual Income dan Cash Flow Operation terhadap Imbal Hasil Saham Sektor
  26. Pertambangan di BEJ 1995–2004. TESIS. Universitas Indonesia.
  27. Fabozzi, Frank, J., and Franco, M. 2003. Capital Market Institution and Instruments,
  29. rdEdition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.
  30. Ghozali, I., dan Irwansyah. 2002. Analisis Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan
  31. denganAlat Ukur EVA, MVA dan ROA terhadap Return Saham pada Perusahaan
  32. Manufakturdi BEJ. Jurnal Penelitian Akuntansi-Bisnis dan Manajemen, Vol.9, No.
  33. , April.
  34. Gujarati, Damodar, N. 1995. Basic Econometrics, Third Edition. Singapore: McGraw-Hill
  35. Book Co.
  36. Hardiningsih, Pancawati., Suryanto.,Chariri, A, 2002, Pengaruh Faktor Fundamental dan
  37. Risiko Ekonomi terhadap Return Saham pada Perusahaan di Bursa Efek Jakarta:
  38. Studi Kasus Basic Industry & Chemical, JurnalStrategi Bisnis, Vol, 8, Des. Tahun
  39. VI.
  40. Harjito, D.A., dan Rangga, A. 2009. Analisis Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan dan Return
  41. Sahamdi Bursa Efek Indonesia. Fenomena, Vol. 7, No.1.
  42. Jogiyanto, 2003, Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi, Edisi Ketiga,Yogyakarta: BPFEYogyakarta.
  43. Kasmir, 2008, Analisis Laporan Keuangan, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
  44. Kramer, J.K. and Pushner, G. (1997), An empirical analysis of economic value added as a
  45. proxy for market value added, Financial Practice and Education, Spring/Summer
  46. Lehn, K. and Makhija, A.K. (1996), EVA and MVA: as performance measures and signals
  47. for strategic change, Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 24, May/June, pp. 34-8.
  48. Lehn, K. and Makhija, A.K. (1997), EVA, accounting profits, and CEO turnover: an
  49. empirical examination 1985-1994, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 10
  50. No. 2, pp. 90-97.
  51. M. Rajesh, Ramana, R., Narayana. 2012. An Empirical Study On EVA and MVA Approach.
  52. International Journal Of Marketing, Financial Service,& Management Research.
  53. Vol 1 No. 3 March 2012.
  54. Munawir, S. 2002. Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
  55. Mundaryatiningsih, S. 2006. Analisis Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan
  56. terhadapKapitalisasi Pasar dan Return Saham Perusahaan Publik di Bursa Efek
  57. Jakarta. TESIS. Institut Teknologi Bandung.
  58. O’Byrne, S.F. (1996), EVA and market value, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol.
  59. No. 1.
  60. O’Byrne, S.F. (1997), EVA and shareholder return, Financial Practice and Education,
  61. Spring/Summer, pp. 50-4.
  62. Olsen, E.E. (1996), Economic Value Added: Perspectives, Boston Consulting Group,
  63. Boston, MA.
  64. Peterson, P.P. and Peterson, D.R. (1996), Company Performance and Measures of Value
  65. Added, The Research Foundation of the Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts,
  66. Charlottesville, VA.
  67. Ross, Stephen, A., Randolph, W. Westerfield, and Jeffrey, J. 2002. Corporate Finance, 6th
  68. Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  69. Shubita, M.F. 2010. The Relationship Between EVA and Stock Return. International
  70. ResearchJournal of Finance and Economics, ISSN 1450–2887 Issue 59.
  71. Saniman Widodo, 2007, Analisis Pengaruh Rasio Aktivitas, Rasio Profitabilitas,Dan Rasio
  72. Pasar, Terhadap Return Saham Syariah Dalam Kelompok JAKARTA ISLAMIC
  73. INDEX (JII), http://www.google.com.Diakses 10 Februari 2012.
  74. Sunardi, Harjono. (2010). Pengaruh Kinerja dengan ROI dan EVA terhadap Return Saham
  75. pada Perusahaan yang Tergabung dalam Indeks LQ 45 di Bursa Efek Indonesia.
  76. Jurnal Akuntansi, Volume 2, Nomor 1 (hlm. 70-92).
  77. Tandelin, Eduardus, 2001, Analisis Investasi Dan Manajemen Portofolio. Yogyakarta:
  78. BPFE.
  79. Tuvey, C. and Sparling, D. (2003), Further thoughts on the relationship between economic
  80. value added and stock market performance, Agribusiness, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 255-67.
  81. Tuvey, C.L., Van Duren, E. and Sparling, D. (2000), The relationship between economic
  82. value added and the stock market performance of agribusiness firms, Agribusiness,
  83. Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 399-416.
  84. Van Horne J.C, 1997, Prinsip-prinsip Manajemen Keuangan, Edisi Kesembilan, Jakarta:
  85. Salemba Empat.
  86. Wiagustini, N.L.P. 2010. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Denpasar: Udayana
  87. University Press.
  88. Zaki, B., dan Ary, L. 2002. Asosiasi Economic Value Added (EVA), Market Value Added
  89. (MVA) dan Rasio Profitabilitas terhadap Harga Saham. TEMA. Vol. III, No. 2,
  90. September, hal 133–149.