Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to: examine the influencing of participatory budgeting, budget goal clarity, and organizational commitment on budgetary slack of government agency unit. A total of 172 officials of echelon 2, 3, and 4 of government agency unit were selected as a sample of this study. The data used in this study are primary data by collecting data through questionnaires. The study found that participatory budgeting, budget goal clarity, and organizational commitment negatively affect budgetary slack of government agency unit. This findings imply that the government agency unit budget slack could be reduced since those organization provide budget by involving all official mainly echelon 2, 3 and 4, defined clearly organization goal, and higher organization commitment.

Keywords

Budget Slack Participation Commitment Goal

Article Details

How to Cite
Fadli, F. (2021). FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI SENJANGAN ANGGARAN DI PEMERINTAH DAERAH. JURNAL FAIRNESS, 5(3), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v5i3.15321

References

  1. Angle. H. L. and J.L. Perry. 1981. An Empirical Assesmant of Organizational Comitment
  2. and Organizational Effectiveness: Administrative. Science Quartely 26. Hal. 1-14.
  3. Anthony, Robert N. dan Vijay Govindarajan. 2004. Management Control System, 11th Yew
  4. York:Irwin-McGraw-Hill.
  5. Baiman, S., dan J.H. Evan. 1982. Prediction Information, and Participative Management.
  6. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol 21. hal 159-180.
  7. Bastian, Indra . 2006. Akuntansi Sektor Publik, Suatu Pengantar, Erlangga Jakarta.
  8. Chong, Vincent K and Chong K.M. 2002. Budget Goal Commitment and Informational
  9. Effects of Budget Participation on Performance: Astructural Equation Modeling
  10. Approach. Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 14-410.
  11. Darma, Emilia S dan Halim, Abdul. 2005. Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran, Sistem
  12. pengendalian manajemen dan Kinerja Manajerial: Studi Empiris Pada Pemerintah
  13. Daerah Kabupaten dan Kota Se-Propinsi DIY”, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Investasi, Vol.
  14. No.1.
  15. Dunk, A. 1993. The E ffect of Budget Emphasis and Information Assimetry on the Relation
  16. Between Budgetary Participation and Slack, The Accounting Review, April: hal 400-
  17. Dunk, A. 2001. The Joint Effeccts Of Budgetary Slack And Task Uncertainty On Subunit
  18. Performance. Universitas Of Western Sydney, Nepean.
  19. Jones, Rowan and Maurice Pendlebury. 2000. Public Sector Accounting 5th Edition,
  20. London, Pitman Publishing.
  21. Kasper, Wolfang and Manfred E. Streit. 2001. Institutional Economics: Social Order and
  22. Public Policy. Cheltham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  23. Kennis, Izzetin.1979. Effect of Budgetary Goal Characteristic on Managerial Attitudes and
  24. Performance, The Accounting Review, Vol. LIV No.4 October.
  25. Kluvers, R. 2001. Program Butgeting and Acccountability in Local Govermant, Australia
  26. Journal of Public Administration, Vol 60 (2), Juni, hal 35-43.
  27. Latuheru, B.P. 2005. Pangaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Senjangan Anggaran dengan
  28. Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Fak. Ekonomi Universitas
  29. Kristen Patra, Http://www.Petra.Ac.id
  30. Lau, and Lim Edmond. 2006. The Relationship Between Participation and Performance:
  31. The Roles of Procedural Justice and Evaluative Styles. Retrive, http://www. Yahoo.
  32. Juni, 2006.
  33. Lukka, K. 1988. Budgeting Biasing in Organization: Theoretical Framework and Empirical
  34. Evidence, Accounting, Organizations and Society 13, hal 281-301.
  35. Luthans, Fred. 2005. Organizational Behavior, International Edition, The McGraw-Hill
  36. Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the America, New York, NY, 10020
  37. Merchant, K. A. 1985. Budgeting and Propersity to Create Budgetary Slack. Accounting,
  38. organization, and Society. 10. hal. 201-210.
  39. Milani, Ken. 1975. The Relationship of Participation in Budgeting System to Industrial
  40. Supervisor Performance and Attitude: A Field Study, The Accounting Review, April.
  41. Mowday, R.T., Stor, R.M., dan Porter Low. 1979. The Measuremant of Organizational
  42. Commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior. Vol. 11. Hal. 224-247.
  43. Nouri, H. 1994. Using Organizational Commitment and Job Involvement to Predict
  44. Budgetery Slack: A Research Note. Accounting, Organizatuon and Society. No. 3.
  45. hal. 289-295.
  46. Nouri, H and Parker, Robert J. 1996. The Effect of Organizational Commitment on The
  47. Relation Between Budgetary Participation and Budgetary Slack, Beharvioral
  48. research in Accounting, Vol. 8, hal 76-90.
  49. Petrie, Murray. 2002. A Framework for Public Sector Management Contracting. OECD,
  50. Journal on Budgeting, hal 117-153.
  51. Pinder, C.C. 1984. Work Inovation: Theory, Issue, and Aplications. Clenview, Scott.
  52. Fpresman and Co.
  53. Porter, L W, Bigley Gregory A, and Steers Richard M. 2003. Motivation and Work
  54. Behavior. Seventh Edition, International Edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  55. Singarimbun, Masri dan Effendi, Sofyan. 1995. Metode Penelitian Survay, Edisi Revisi,
  56. LP3ES, Jakarta.
  57. Subramanian N and Ashkanasy Neal M. 2001. The Effect of Organisational Culture
  58. Perception on The Relationship Between Budgetary Participation and Managerial
  59. Job-Related Outcomes. Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 1, Juni.
  60. Suhartono, Ehrman and Solichin Mochammad. 2006. Pengaruh Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran
  61. Terhadap Senjangan Anggaran Instansi Pemerintah Daerah Dengan Komitmen
  62. Organisasi sebagai Pemoderasi, Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, Vol 7 No.1
  63. Young, S.M. 1985. Participative Budgeting: The Effects of Risk Aversion and Assymetric
  64. Informations on Budgetary Slack. Journal of Accounting Research 23. hal. 829-842.
  65. Yuen. 2004. Goal Characteristics, Communication And Reward Systems, And Managerial
  66. Propensity To Create Budgeting Slack. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol 19 No 4
  67. pp 517-532.
  68. Yuhertiana, I. 2003. Principal-agent theory dalam proses perencanaan anggaran sektor
  69. publik. Kompak – Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen dan Sistem Informasi (SeptemberDesember): hal 403-422