Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 8, 2020
Accepted
June 8, 2020
Published
June 8, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 75 Download : 48

Main Article Content

Abstract

One of the sources of non-tax state revenues from the District Office of Religious Affairs comes from the marriage fees that are carried out outside the District Office of Religious Affairs, as stipulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 Year 2016. This Regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs is applied in all District Offices of Religious Affairs in every City or Regency in Indonesia. The formulations of the problem investigated in this study were: (1) How was the Implementation of the Regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 of 2016 concerning the Management of Non-Tax State Revenues on Marriage Fees or Reconciliation Outside the District Office of Religious Affairs in the District Offices of Religious Affairs in Bengkulu City?; (2) Was the marriage cost outside the District Office of Religious Affairs paid by the bride and groom outside the provisions of the Regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Number 12 year 2016 concerning the Management of Non-Tax State Revenues on Marriage Fees or Reconciliation Outside the District Office of Religious Affairs can be classified as gratification acts y as regulated in Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 year 2001 concerning Corruption Crimes?. The research method used to address these problems was the empirical juridical research method. The results of this study indicated that: (1) The regulation of the Minister of Religious Affairs Number 12 year 2016 concerning the Management of Non-Tax State Revenues on Marriage Fee and/or Reconciliation Outside the District Office of Religious Affairs, has been implemented at the District Offices of Religious Affairs of Bengkulu City, namely, in terms of the provisions for marriage fees, deposits and receipts, disbursements, uses and reporting. (2) Marriage Fees or Reconciliation Outside the District Office of Religious Affairs, especially in the case of the Headman, or the Head of the District Office  of Religious Affairs, or Officers who received money when carrying out services for the implementation of marriage contract counseling outside the District Office of Religious Affairs, cannot be classified as gratification acts as regulated in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 Year 2001 regarding Corruption Crime.

Keywords

Implementation Regulation of Minister of Religious Affairs Non-tax State Revenue on Marriage Fee outside the District Office of Religious Affairs

Article Details

License
Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
How to Cite
Hartono, B., Dahwal, S., & Darudin, M. (2020). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REGULATION OF THE MINISTER OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 12 YEAR 2016 REGARDING THE MANAGEMENT OF NON-TAX STATE REVENUES ON MARRIAGE FEE OR RECONCILIATION OUTSIDE THE DISTRICT OFFICE OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS AT THE DISTRICT OFFICES OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS IN BENGKULU CITY. Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.33369/j_bengkoelenjust.v10i1.11359
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdul Majid, Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Teoritis Dan Praktis, Interes Media, Bandung, 2014.
  2. Amirudin dan Zainal Asikin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2013.
  3. Amrullah Salim, Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik Berdasarkan Pancasila dan UUD 1945, Pustaka Media, Jakarta, 2016.
  4. Bachsan Mustafa, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara, Alumni Bandung, Bandung, 2007.
  5. Bambang Sunggono, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2015.
  6. Bambang Waluyo, Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktik, PT Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2008..
  7. Budi Winarno, Kebijakan Publik : Teori dan Proses Edisi Revisi, Media Presindo. Yogyakarta, 2007.
  8. Burhan Ashofa, Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT Rinneka Cipta, Jakarta, 2007.
  9. Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia, Buku Rencana Induk Kantor Urusan Agama Dan Pengembangannya, Ditjen Binmas Islam dan Urussan Haji, Jakarta, 2002.
  10. Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia, Tugas-Tugas Pejabat Pencatat Nikah, Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam dan Penyelenggaraan Haji
  11. Departemen Agama RI, Ditjen Binmas Islam dan Urussan Haji, Jakarta, 2004.
  12. E. Mulyasa, Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi, Konsep dan Implementasi, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung, 2003.
  13. Erly Suandy, Hukum Perpajakan, Salemba Empat, Jakarta, 2014.
  14. Ismail Nawawi, Public Policy, ITS Press, Surabaya, 2009.
  15. Nomensen Sinamo, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jala Permata Aksara, Jakarta, 2010.
  16. Nurmandi, Wacana Pembangunan Dalam Negara Demokrasi. PT Rinneka Cipta, Jakarta, 2009.
  17. Philipus M. Hadjon, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2008.
  18. Prayudi Atmosudirdjo, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 2003, hlm. 34.
  19. Rian Nugroho, Kebijakan Publik, Formulasi, Implementasi dan Evaluasi, PT Gramedia, Jakarta, 2003.
  20. Ridwan HR, Hukum administrasi Negara, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2008.
  21. Rizky Putri, Kualitas Pelayanan Pelaksanan Pencatatan Nikah, Bina Cipta, Yogyakarta, 2012.
  22. Sadikin Ali, Peranan Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan, Pustaka Setia, Bandung, 2001.
  23. Samudra Wibawa, Kebijakan Publik: Proses dan Analisis, Intermedia Jakarta, 2004.
  24. Sarjudin, Pengaturan Pelaksanaan Pengelolaan Biaya Nikah Di Indonesia, Kencana, Jakarta, 2008.
  25. Sholihin A W, Analisis Kebijakan, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta, 2005.
  26. Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta, 1986.
  27. Sonny Sumarsono, Manajemen Keuangan Pemerintahan, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2010.
  28. Subagio, Hukum Keuangan Negara Republik Indonesia, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 1991.
  29. Subarsono, Analisis Kebijakan Publik (Konsep, teori, dan Aplikasi), Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2012.
  30. Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, PT Rinneka Cipta, Jakarta.
  31. Suharsono, Dasar-Dasar Kebijakan Publik, UNY Press, Yogyakarta, 2010.
  32. Syamsudin, Operasionalisasi Penelitian Hukum, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2007.
  33. Tohir Muhadjirin, Kondisi Dan kinerja Kantor Urusan Agama Di Indonesia, Balai Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Agama, Semarang, 2010.
  34. Zainudin Ali, Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2014.