EXECUTION LEGAL PROBLEM ON STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT DECISION THAT HAS GAINED PERMANENT LEGAL FORCE BY INSTITUTION/OFFICIAL(S) OF STATE ADMINISTRATION

Donfri Donfri(1), Iskandar Iskandar(2), Edra Satmaidi(3),
(1) , Indonesia
(2) Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia

Abstract


This study aimed at reviewing about the legal problem upon the execution of the decision of State Administrative Court (SAC) that has gained permanent legal force by Institution/official(s) of State Administration (SA). The method used in this research was normative-juridical. This research used constitutional approach, court decision and conceptual approach. Legal material analysis was conducted juridically and qualitatively. It was found that first, the binding force of law norms constitution of SAC in the regulation of execution on the SAC decision that had gained legal binding force was not sufficiently strong to push/force Institution/official(s) of SA to conduct the execution of SAC decision. Second, the causal factors of Institution/official(s) that did not execute the decision of SAC that had gained permanent legal force was due to the implementation of law norms that had gained legal binding force of Institution/official(s) of SA to implement the decision was not sufficiently strong to push/force the Institution/official(s) of SA to implement the execution of SAC decision, the absence of Government Regulation about the implementation of Recognizance of Bail, the low level of compliances and legal awareness of Institution/official(s) of SA, the non-presence of Executor's Institution. Third, the concept construction of legal norm regulations that had legal force to Institution/official(s) of SA to execute the SAC decision which was by regulation the legal norms that had sufficiently legal force by changing the legal norms as stipulated on the Article 116 Constitution of SAC and/or adding new norm requirements, which is Article 116A.


Keywords: Legal Problem, Execution, SAC Decision, Institution/Official(s) of SA.


Full Text:

PDF

References


A’an Efendi dan Freddy Poernomo, 2017, Hukum Administrasi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Fatria Khairo, 2016, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Cintya Press, Jakarta.

Harifin A. Tumpa, 2010, Memahami Eksistensi Uang Paksa (Dwangsom) dan Implementasinya di Indonesia, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Ni’Matul Huda, 2012, Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Edisi Revisi, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2016, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.

Philipus M. Hadjon, (et al), 1993, Pengantar Hukum administrasi Indonesia (Introduction to the Indonesian Administrative law), Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Ridwan HR. 2011. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Edisi Revisi. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

SF. Marbun, 2003, Peradilan Administrasi dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Kedua, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2007.Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Edisi Kelima. Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Supandi, 2016, Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, edisi revisi, PT. Alumni, Bandung.

______________,2016, Problematika Eksekusi Putusan Peradilan TUN Terhadap Pejabat TUN Daerah, PT. Alumni, Bandung.

Titik Triwulan Tutik, 2010, Pengantar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia, Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta.

Wicipto Setiadi, 1994, Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Suatu Perbandingan, RajaGrafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Zainuddin Ali, 2009, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Zairin Harahap, 2007, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Edisi Revisi, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 0 times
 PDF Downloaded : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bengkoelen Justice is indexed on :

 

 

Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Bengkulu

Jalan WR Supratman, Kandang Limun, Bengkulu.

email : Bengkoelenjustice@gmail.com atau jurnalbkljustice@unib.ac.id

Telephone (0736) 21170, 21884  Fax. (0736) 22105

 

View My Stats