Jurnal Amplifier

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Journal Amplifier: scientific Journal of Technic Electric and Computer is a scientific communication media which is issued by Study Programme of Electrical Technic, Faculty of Technic, the University of Bengkulu.  p-ISSN 2089-2020 and e-ISSN 2089-2020 in a year published twice (June and November). Articles can be the results of research, scientific studies, and the analysis and solving issues relevant to the field of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, and has never been published in other scientific journals. This topic includes parts is Signal, System and Electronics, Digital Signal Processing, Robotic Systems, Image Processing, Biomedical Instrumentation, Micro Electronics, Embedded Systems includes parts is Communication Systems, Management and Protocol Network, Telecommunication, Wireless Communications, Opto Electronics, Fuzzy Sensor and Network. This journal collaborates with FORTEI (Forum Pendidikan Tinggi Teknik Elektro Indonesia).

 

 

Section Policies

 

Peer Review Process

PEER REVIEW POLICY

Publication of articles in Jurnal Amplifier is dependent solely on scientific validity and coherence as judged by our editors and/or peer, reviewers, who will also assess whether the writing is comprehensible and whether the work represents a useful contribution to the field. Jurnal Amplifier acknowledged the effort and suggestions made by its reviewers. 

Initial evaluation of manuscripts

The Editor will first evaluate all manuscripts submitted. Although rare, yet it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the aims and scope of the Jurnal Amplifier. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to experts for review.

Type of peer review

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates the already published works, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. The method is a double-blind review

Review reports

Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:

  • Is original by stating the objectives and gap clearly
  • Is methodologically sound
  • Follows appropriate ethical guidelines
  • Has results/findings which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
  • Correctly references previous relevant work
  • Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.

Decision

Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. Editor’s decision is final.

Becoming a Reviewer

If you are not currently a reviewer for Jurnal Amplifier but would like to be added to the list of reviewers, please contact us. The benefits of reviewing for Jurnal Amplifier include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in the related research area at an early stage, and to be acknowledged in our list of reviewers. You may also be able to cite your work for Jurnal Amplifier as part of your professional development requirements. Jurnal Amplifier reviewers are volunteers who contribute their expertise to the science, thus no financial payments are made.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...