Main Article Content

Abstract

The objectives of this study were two folds; first; to find out English expressions used by male and female students of the  English Study  Program in responding to personal problems; second; to identify whether male and female students responses to personal problems were similar or different.The subjects were English Study Program at the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education of Bengkulu  University.  The total numbers of subjects were ten persons; five male and five female. Data were collected by audio-recording natural conversations informal situations outside the classroom. The results show that there were differences and similarities in responding to personal problems between male and female.

Article Details

How to Cite
Susanti, A. (2018). AN ANALYSIS OF RESPONSES TO PERSONAL PROBLEMS ADOPTED BY FEMALE AND MALE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH STUDY PROGRAM OF FKIP UNIVERSITAS BENGKULU. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 1(2), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v1i2.4197

References

  1. Acker, G. 1987. Structure- Based Dialogue.English
  2. Teaching Forum. Vol: XXV No. 3 July.
  3. Collins, W. 1989. Essential English Dictionary.
  4. Birmingham UniversityPress.
  5. Fishman, P. 1987. Interaction: The work women do, In Barrie Thorne, CherisKramarae and Nancy Henley. Language, gender and society. NewburyHouse.
  6. Holmes, Janet. 2001. An Introduction to Sociolinguistic. Second Edition. England. Longman.
  7. Jones, L. 1981. Functions of English recorded exercises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Johnstone, Barbara. 1983. Qualitative Method in
  9. Sociolinguistics. Oxford UniversityPress. Kerekes, J. 1992. Women and men, sympathy and
  10. advice. The same or different. Lancester
  11. University.
  12. Kesseler, S. J and W. Me Kenna. 1978. Gender.
  13. Chicago. The Universityof London.
  14. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Second Edition. United States of America.
  15. Nunan, David. (1992). Research Method in Language Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Suwarno, B. 1995. “Perilaku Androgini :Fajar Menyingsing bagi Masa DepanWanita” Warta StudiPerempuan. EdisiKhusus.
  17. Sunderland, J. 1994. Exploring Gender: Question and Implementation for English Language Education. Lancaster University.
  18. Tannen, D. 1990. You just Don’t Understand. William
  19. Marrow and Company, Inc.
  20. Wallork, J. F. language and People. London. Longman