Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 20, 2018
Accepted
October 20, 2018
Published
October 20, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 177 Download : 175

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the interaction pattern in SMAN 1 Curup Kota, based on Coulthard theory (2002). This study analyzed the interaction pattern and type of act used by teacher and students to see the ideal pattern in the classroom. The data analysis shows that (a) the dominant pattern used in the classroom is complete pattern (IRF) and there are also semi-complete pattern (IR) and incomplete pattern (IF); (b) In the type of acts section, the elicitation is the highest followed by informative and starter in the initiation move,  reply as the highest act in the response move, and in the follow up accept as the highest followed by comment. It can be concluded that interaction pattern in the classroom is dominantly occured is ideal pattern but it’s not good interaction pattern because delimit student opportunity in the classroom

Article Details

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Afriyanto, H., Harahap, A., & Azwandi, A. (2018). AN ANALYSIS OF INTERACTIONAL PATTERN BETWEEN TEACHER AND STUDENT IN SMAN 1 CURUP KOTA. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 2(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v2i1.5873
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Atkin, Andrew (2010).Sinclair and Coulthard’s ‘IRF’ model in a one-to-one classroom: an analysis. Retrieved on 13th August 2016 ,http://ccsenet.org
  2. Bloome. David (2005).Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy event. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates :
  3. B.Cazden.Courtney (2001). Classroom Discourse: The language of teaching and Learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann
  4. Coulthard .M .(2002). Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. New York:Routledge
  5. Ginarsih. Inggar (2013). An Analysis Of Classroom Interaction At The Second Year Of Smp 17 Gedongtataan. Retrieved on 12 th August 2016. http:// digilib.unila.ac.id/6951/
  6. Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of Language Teaching, UK : Longman
  7. Harahap, Alamsyah. (2015). Teacher- Students Discourse in English Teaching at High School (Classroom Discourse Anlaysis). Retrieved on 15 th November
  8. Helena, Hing (2013). Characteristics Chinese Student’s Learning Style
  9. Liu. (2012). A Case Study on College English Classroom Discourse. Retrieved on 15th September 2016, http://google scholar.com
  10. Lewis, R. (1997). Indonesian students’ learning styles. EA Journal, 14(2), 2732. Retrieved on 15th September 2016, http://google scholar.com
  11. Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M. C., Stroet, K., & Bosker, R. (2012). Observed lesson structure during the first year of secondary education: Exploration of change and link with academic engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 835-850
  12. McKay, S. (2003). The cultural basis of teaching English as an international language. TESOL Matters, 13(4), 1-2.
  13. Matthew.(2010). Applying the Sinclair and Coulthard Model ofdiscourse analysis to –a student centered EFL classroom. Retrieved on 29th August 2016 http:// Eduacademia.com
  15. Nahid Golafshani. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Retrieved on 18th September 2016. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-4/golafshani.pdf
  16. Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  17. Nurmasitah. Sita (2010). A Study of Classroom Interaction Characteristics in a Geography Class Conducted in English: The Case at Year Ten of an Immersion Class in SMAN 2 Semarang, Retrieved on 12thAugust 2016 http:// eprints.undip.ac.id/23803/
  18. Walsh, Steve (2011).Exploring Classroom Discourse.UK: University of Nottingham
  19. Walsh. Steve (2006).Investigating Classroom Discourse, New York :Routledge