Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Tujuan jurnal ini adalah untuk menerbitkan penelitian berkualitas tinggi dalam pendidikan matematika termasuk pengajaran dan pembelajaran, pengajaran, pengembangan kurikulum, lingkungan belajar, pendidikan guru, teknologi pendidikan, perkembangan pendidikan, dari berbagai jenis penelitian seperti survei, penelitian dan pengembangan, eksperimental penelitian, penelitian tindakan kelas, dll.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Editors
  • Saleh Haji
Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Anggota dewan penasihat editorial Reflesia  berasal dari universitas guru-perguruan tinggi. Artikel-artikel yang dikirim ke Journal selalu ditinjau oleh dua anggota Dewan Penasihat Editorial (double peer peer review), dan dalam beberapa kasus, jika perlu, oleh pengulas eksternal lainnya. Keputusan publikasi artikel tergantung pada laporan evaluasi dari anggota Dewan Penasihat Editorial. Proses evaluasi artikel memakan waktu sekitar enam bulan. Semua komentar dari pengulas harus dipertimbangkan dengan serius, jika tidak jurnal tidak dapat menjamin penerbitan naskah.

 

Open Access Policy

Jurnal ini menyediakan akses terbuka langsung ke kontennya dengan prinsip bahwa membuat penelitian tersedia secara bebas untuk publik mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan global yang lebih besar.

 

Archiving

Jurnal ini menggunakan sistem LOCKSS untuk membuat sistem pengarsipan terdistribusi di antara perpustakaan yang berpartisipasi dan memungkinkan perpustakaan tersebut untuk membuat arsip permanen jurnal untuk tujuan pelestarian dan restorasi. Lebih...

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Reflesia adalah jurnal elektronik peer-review. Pernyataan ini mengklarifikasi perilaku etis dari semua pihak yang terlibat dalam tindakan penerbitan artikel dalam jurnal ini, termasuk penulis, pemimpin redaksi, Dewan Editorial, peer-reviewer dan penerbit (Departemen Pendidikan Matematika, Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas) Bengkulu Pernyataan ini didasarkan pada Pedoman Praktik Terbaik COPE untuk Editor Jurnal.

Pedoman Etika untuk Publikasi Jurnal

Publikasi artikel peer-review di Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Reflesia adalah blok bangunan penting dalam pengembangan jaringan pengetahuan yang koheren dan dihormati. Ini adalah refleksi langsung dari kualitas karya penulis dan institusi yang mendukung mereka. Artikel yang diulas rekan mendukung dan mewujudkan metode ilmiah. Karena itu penting untuk menyepakati standar perilaku etis yang diharapkan untuk semua pihak yang terlibat dalam tindakan penerbitan: penulis, editor jurnal, peer reviewer, penerbit, dan masyarakat.

Department of Mathematics Education, the Graduate School of Universitas Bengkulu as the publisher of Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Reflesia takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Department of Mathematics Education, the Graduate School of Universitas Bengkulu and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Pengungkapan dan Konflik Kepentingan

Semua penulis harus mengungkapkan dalam manuskrip mereka segala konflik kepentingan finansial atau substantif lainnya yang mungkin ditafsirkan untuk memengaruhi hasil atau interpretasi naskah mereka. Semua sumber dukungan keuangan untuk proyek harus diungkapkan.

Kesalahan mendasar dalam karya yang dipublikasikan

Ketika seorang penulis menemukan kesalahan atau ketidakakuratan yang signifikan dalam karyanya yang diterbitkan sendiri, adalah kewajiban penulis untuk segera memberi tahu editor jurnal atau penerbit dan bekerja sama dengan editor untuk menarik kembali atau memperbaiki kertas.

 

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Reflesia adalah jurnal yang diterbitkan online dua kali setahun pada bulan Juni dan Desember

 

Screening for Plagiarism Policy

Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika  memiliki kebijakan penyaringan untuk plagiarisme. Kami menggunakan Perangkat Lunak Anti-Plagiarisme "Turnitin" untuk memeriksa artikel keaslian