Main Article Content

Abstract

Kehadiran buku panduan praktikum memiliki urgensi yang tinggi pada perkuliahan biologi molekuler Drosophila melanogaster merupakan organisme model paling populer di bidang biologi namun pemanfaatannya di Indonesia masih jauh dari optimal. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis kebutuhan terkait pentingnya kehadiran buku panduan penelitian biologi molekuler berbasis pemanfaatan D. melanogaster. Mahasiswa Biologi dari universitas di Malang dilibatkan sebagai respoden penelitian. Kuesioner digunakan sebagai instrumen pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini. Analisis data menggunakan statistika deskriptif dan menggunakan perform assessment chart. Hasil penelitian menginformasikan mayoritas mahasiswa memiliki kompetensi meneliti yang rendah. Analisis perform assessment chart menghasilkan dua purpose statement, yaitu dibutuhkannya buku panduan yang dapat melatih mahasiswa merancang hingga melaporkan penelitian dan dibutuhkannya panduan penelitian genetika molekuler. Oleh karena itu, keberadaan buku panduan penelitian molekuler yang dapat memandu mahasiswa melakukan penelitian perlu dikembangkan

KeywordsDrosophila melanogaster, Genetika molekuler, Inkuiri, Keterampilan meneliti, Lalat buah

Keywords

Drosophila melanogaster genetika molekuler inkuiri keterampilan meneliti lalat buah

Article Details

Author Biography

Ahmad Fauzi, Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Teacher and Training Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Department of Biology Education
How to Cite
Fatmawati, D., Saleem, M., Hindun, I., Permatasari, I., Solikhah, S., Khoiroh, D., & Fauzi, A. (2022). Urgensi Keberadaan Buku Panduan Penelitian Biologi Molekuler Menggunakan Drosophila melanogaster. Diklabio: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Biologi, 6(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.33369/diklabio.6.1.56-64

References

  1. Adedeji, A. A., & Vicente-Crespo, M. (2017). Rejuvenating research and training in biomedical sciences in Nigeria: Drosophila melanogaster as a versatile alternative model. Archives of Basic & Applied Medicine, 5, 1–10. http://archivesbamui.com/ojs/index.php/abam/article/download/3/1
  2. Aditomo, A., & Klieme, E. (2020). Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: evidence from high and low-performing education systems. International Journal of Science Education, 42(4), 504–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1716093
  3. Akihary, C. V., & Kolondam, B. J. (2020). Pemanfaatan gen 16s rRNA sebagai perangkat identifikasi bakteri untuk penelitian-penelitian di Indonesia. Pharmacon, 9(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.35799/pha.9.2020.27405
  4. Aktami?, H., Hi?de, E., & Özden, B. (2016). Effects of the inquiry-based learning method on students’ achievement, science process skills and attitudes towards science: A meta-analysis science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(4), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10183a
  5. Banerjee, S., Benji, S., Liberow, S., & Steinhauer, J. (2020). Using Drosophila melanogaster to discover human disease genes: An educational primer for use with “amyotrophic lateral sclerosis modifiers in drosophila reveal the phospholipase d pathway as a potential therapeutic target.” Genetics, 216(3), 633–641. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.120.303495
  6. Bare, Y., Ratih, D., & Sari, T. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Mahasiswa (LKM) berbasis inkuiri pada materi interaksi molekuler. BieEDUIN: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.15575/bioeduin.v11i1.12077
  7. Beck, C., Butler, A., & Burke da Silva, K. (2014). Promoting inquiry-based teaching in laboratory courses: Are we meeting the grade? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-12-0245
  8. Bogar, Y. (2019). Literature review on inquiry-based learning in science education. International Journal of Science and Education, 1(2), 91–118. https://academic.microsoft.com/paper/2946125952
  9. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387095059
  10. Carvalho, Y. G. S., Vitorino, L. C., de Souza, U. J. B., & Bessa, L. A. (2019). Recent trends in research on the genetic diversity of plants: Implications for conservation. Diversity, 11(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/d11040062
  11. Chen, S., Lee, A. Y., Bowens, N. M., Huber, R., & Kravitz, E. A. (2002). Fighting fruit flies: A model system for the study of aggression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(8), 5664–5668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082102599
  12. Christesen, D., Yang, Y. T., Somers, J., Robin, C., Sztal, T., Batterham, P., & Perry, T. (2017). Transcriptome analysis of Drosophila melanogaster third instar larval ring glands points to novel functions and uncovers a cytochrome p450 required for development. G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics, 7(2), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.037333
  13. Duran, M., & Dökme, ?. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s critical thinking skills. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12), 2887–2908. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a
  14. Fauzi, A., Corebima, A. D., & Zubaidah, S. (2016). The fluctuation of adult filial number and eclosion time of Drosophila melanogaster that exposed by mobile phone in multiple generations. Proceeding of The 6th Annual Basic Science International Conference, 124–128.
  15. Fauzi, A., & Ramadani, S. D. (2017). Learning the genetics concepts through project activities using Drosophila melanogaster: A qualitative descriptive study. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 3(3), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v3i3.4540
  16. Frisch, J. K., Jackson, P. C., & Murray, M. C. (2018). Transforming undergraduate biology learning with inquiry-based instruction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9155-z
  17. Hales, K. G., Korey, C. A., Larracuente, A. M., & Roberts, D. M. (2015). Genetics on the fly: A primer on the Drosophila model system. Genetics, 201(3), 815–842. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.183392
  18. He, Y., & Jasper, H. (2014). Studying aging in Drosophila. Methods, 68(1), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.04.008
  19. Heil, C. S. S., Manzano-Winkler, B., Hunter, M. J., Noor, J. K. F., & Noor, M. A. F. (2013). Witnessing evolution first hand: A K–12 laboratory exercise in genetics & evolution using Drosophila. The American Biology Teacher, 75(2), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2013.75.2.8
  20. Hoyer, N., Petersen, M., Tenedini, F., & Soba, P. (2018). Assaying mechanonociceptive behavior in Drosophila larvae. Bio-Protocol, 8(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21769/bioprotoc.2736
  21. Hsu, J. L., & Rowland?Goldsmith, M. (2021). Student perceptions of an inquiry?based molecular biology lecture and lab following a mid?semester transition to online teaching. Biochemistry and Molecular
  22. Biology Education, 49(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21478
  23. Jeibmann, A., & Paulus, W. (2009). Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism of brain diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 10(2), 407–440. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10020407
  24. Jennings, B. H. (2011). Drosophila-a versatile model in biology & medicine. Materials Today, 14(5), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70113-4
  25. Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2014a). The effect of guided-inquiry instruction on 6th grade Turkish students’ achievement, science process skills, and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942
  26. Koksal, E. A., & Berberoglu, G. (2014b). The effect of guided-inquiry instruction on 6th grade Turkish students’ achievement, science process skills, and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.721942
  27. Kumar, R. S. (2016). Research trends in medical physics: A global perspective. Library Philosophy & Practice. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1362
  28. Kusuma, R. T., Siahaan, S. M., & Andriani, N. (2019). Guided inquiry model effect on students learning outcomes in static fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1166, 012011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1166/1/012011
  29. Lestari, F. (2021). Pengembangan media interaktif Mata Kuliah Teknik Analisis Biologi Molekuler (TABM). Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 5(2), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol5-iss2/609
  30. Luckie, D. B., Maleszewski, J. J., Loznak, S. D., & Krha, M. (2004). Infusion of collaborative inquiry throughout a biology curriculum increases student learning: a four-year study of “Teams and Streams.” Advances in Physiology Education, 28(4), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00025.2004
  31. Mohammad, O. (2017). Recent trends in biochemistry and biotechnology. J Biochem Biotech, 1(1), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.35841/Biochemistry-Biotechnology.1000104
  32. Mohr, S. E., Hu, Y., Kim, K., Housden, B. E., & Perrimon, N. (2014). Resources for functional genomics studies in drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 197(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.154344
  33. Murthy, P. P. N., Thompson, M., & Hungwe, K. (2014). Development of a semester-long, inquiry-based laboratory course in upper-level biochemistry and molecular biology. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(11), 1909–1917. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400119u
  34. Nellen, W., Rahasta, A. H., Hermanto, F. E., & Lorenza, M. R. W. G. (2017). Molecular biology education in Indonesia - suggestions for improvement. Berkala Penelitian Hayati, 22(2), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.23869/bphjbr.22.2.20173
  35. Nugroho, A. A., Hanik, N. R., & Harsono, S. (2017). Pengembangan modul Biologi Molekuler berbasis Learning Cycle 7E untuk mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v5i1.1780
  36. Pacifico, R., MacMullen, C. M., Walkinshaw, E., Zhang, X., & Davis, R. L. (2018). Brain transcriptome changes in the aging Drosophila melanogaster accompany olfactory memory performance deficits. PLOS ONE, 13(12), e0209405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209405
  37. Pandey, U. B., & Nichols, C. D. (2011). Human disease models in Drosophila melanogaster and the role of the fly in therapeutic drug discovery. Pharmacological Reviews, 63(2), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.110.003293
  38. Pasini, M. E., Bertolotto, F., & Fasano, P. (2010). The role of models in science: an experience with Drosophila. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1164–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.166
  39. Ramadani, S. D., Corebima, A. D., & Zubaidah, S. (2016). The effect of dark condition on the fecundity and development time of Drosophila melanogaster, strains of wild type, white, and ebony for several generations. Quest Journals Journal of Research in Agriculture and Animal Science, 4(2), 1–10. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0277/9e4a09703941ed7747c9e86d4531d596291e.pdf
  40. Ramdhan, D. H. (2014). Penelitian genom dan implikasinya dalam kesehatan masyarakat di Indonesia. Kesmas: National Public Health Journal, 9(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v9i1.448
  41. Rothhaas, S., Wright, M. C., & Swanson, C. (2020). Using Drosophila motor mutants to teach neurodevelopment in an undergraduate neurobiology lab. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 18(2), A93–A101. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848517
  42. Rusmana, A. N., Rachmatullah, A., Nuraeni, E., & Ha, M. (2021). The genetics conceptual understanding of Indonesian and United States undergraduate biology students. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 7(1), 197–225. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10024
  43. Sandika, B., & Fitrihidajati, H. (2018). Improving creative thinking skills and scientific attitude through inquiry-based learning in basic biology lecture toward students of biology education. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5326
  44. Sangam, S. L., Arali, U. B., Patil, C. G., & Gani, S. R. (2014). Research trends in genetics: Scientometric profile of selected Asian countries. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 34(3), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.34.5802
  45. Song, Y.-H. (2005). A review of soil erodibility in water and wind erosion research. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 15(2), 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1360/gs050205
  46. Stephenson, R., & Metcalfe, N. (2013). Drosophila melanogaster: A fly through its history and current use. The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 43(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.4997/JRCPE.2013.116
  47. Suárez, Á., Specht, M., Prinsen, F., Kalz, M., & Ternier, S. (2018). A review of the types of mobile activities in mobile inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 118, 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.004
  48. Sukmawati, I., Corebima, A. D., & Zubaidah, S. (2016). Fecundity and the development time of D. melanogaster of wild-type, white, and ebony strains for several generations in high temperature environment. Quest Journals Journal of Research in Agriculture and Animal Science, 4(2), 2321–9459. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Siti_Zubaidah5/publication/322314613_PENGARUH_SUHU_LINGKUNGAN_DAN_MACAM_STRAIN_TERHADAP_JUMLAH_KETURUNAN_Drosophila_melanogaster/links/5a53716da6fdccf3e2df2c33/PENGARUH-SUHU-LINGKUNGAN-DAN-MACAM-STRAIN-TERHADAP-JUMLAH-
  49. Sun, Y., Yolitz, J., Wang, C., Spangler, E., Zhan, M., & Zou, S. (2013). Aging studies in Drosophila melanogaster. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), 1048, 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-556-9_7
  50. Tolwinski, N. (2017). Introduction: Drosophila—A model system for developmental biology. Journal of Developmental Biology, 5(3), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb5030009
  51. Ugur, B., Chen, K., & Bellen, H. J. (2016). Drosophila tools and assays for the study of human diseases. Disease Models & Mechanisms, 9(3), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.023762
  52. Vecchio, G. (2015). A fruit fly in the nanoworld: Once again Drosophila contributes to environment and human health. Nanotoxicology, 9(2), 135–137. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2014.911985
  53. Vedelek, V., Bodai, L., Grézal, G., Kovács, B., Boros, I. M., Laurinyecz, B., & Sinka, R. (2018). Analysis of Drosophila melanogaster testis transcriptome. BMC Genomics, 19(1), 697. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5085-z
  54. Vogler, G., & Bodmer, R. (2015). Cellular mechanisms of drosophila heart morphogenesis. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 2(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd2010002
  55. Wang, J. T. H. (2017). Course-based undergraduate research experiences in molecular biosciences—patterns, trends, and faculty support. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 364(15). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx157