Article Sidebar

Submitted
February 19, 2021
Accepted
February 19, 2021
Published
December 10, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 469 Download : 3006

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to develop an innovative 21st century lesson plan (RPP) in grade IV elementary schools that can be used as a reference for teachers in implementing classroom learning. This study is a Research and Development (R&D) research by modifying the 4D model by Thiagarajan and Sammel. The development procedure consists of three stages, namely, define, design and develop. The validation was carried out by PGSD lecturers and elementary school teachers. The lesson plans developed were given scores and responses by 2 teachers to assess the products developed from the presentation and material aspects. The instrument used is in the form of a validation sheet to obtain input in the form of comments, assessments, notes, criticisms and suggestions for the initial draft lesson plans and teacher response questionnaires to collect data about teacher responses to the lesson plans that have been developed.

The data were analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis and descriptive statistics, namely expert validation data analysis and teacher response data analysis. Teacher responses obtained results of 89.285 with very good category as the final product of development. This research produces a development product in the form of innovative 21st Century RPP

 Keywords: Development, 21st Century Innovative RPP, Thematic

 

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Wulandari, A., Juarsa, O., & Agusdianita, N. (2020). Pengembangan RPP Inovatif Abad 21 Pada Pembelajaran Tematik di Kelas IV SD Negeri Kota Bengkulu. JURIDIKDAS: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar, 3(3), 362–372. https://doi.org/10.33369/juridikdas.3.3.362-372
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abidin, Y., (2014), Desain Sistem Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
  2. Arafah, H. dan Sihes, A.J.B. (2015), “Competencies for the Classroom Instructional Designer”. International Journal of Secondary Education, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 16-20.
  3. Ariyana, Pudjiastuti, Bestary & Zamroni. (2018). Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan
  4. Ariyanti, P.L, Dantes, N., Marhaeni, A.A.I.N, (2020), Pengembangan RPP Tema Keluargaku Pada Siswa Kelas I Berbasis Kecakapan Belajar dan Berinovasi Abad 21, Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, Vol. 4 No 1, Hal 147-158
  5. Daryanto. (2012). Media Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Sarana Tutorial Nurani Sejahtera
  6. Hartini, A., (2017), Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Project Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikr Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, Vol. 1, No. 2, hal: 7-16.
  7. Katz, Irvin. (2007). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy: Integration and Assessment in Higher Education“. Systemics, Cybernetics And Informatics Vol: 5, No : 4
  8. Kemendikbud, (2016), Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
  9. Kunandar. (2011). Guru Profesional (Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan dan Sukses dalam Sertifikasi Guru). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
  10. Muijs, D, & David R, (2008). Efective Teaching, Teori dan Aplikasi, Cet. I. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  11. Rusdin, N.M. (2018). “Teachers’ Readiness in Implementing 21st Century Learning.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 4, Hal. 1293–1306
  12. Sani, R. A. (2016). Pembelajaran Berbasis HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills).Tangerang: Tira Smart
  13. Siregar, Y. (2010). “Kompetensi Guru dalam Bidang Strategi Perencanaan dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Formatif: 39-48. ISSN: 2088-351X.
  14. Soni, J., (2014), Penerapan Supervisi Akademik Berbasis Coaching Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Mengajar Guru Rumpun Mata Pelajaran IPA dalam Menerapkan Strategi Pembelajaran Inkuiri di SMAN Unggul Aceh Timur. Tesis. Program Pascasarjana. Universitas Negeri Medan.
  15. Suyono. (2007). Pembelajaran Efektif dan Produktif Berbasis Literasi: Analisis Konteks, Prinsip, Wujud Alternatif Strategi Implementasinya di Sekolah. Sastra Indonesia Fak. Sastra Universitas Negeri Malang.
  16. Wiersema, Nico. 2000. How does Collaborative Learning actually work in a classroom and how do students reac to it? A Brief Reflection. http://www.city.londonmet.ac.uk/
  17. Zubaedi. (2011). Desain Pendidikan Karakter. Jakarta:Kencana Prenada