Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to compare learning outcomes through image media and concrete media, and to find out which instructional media is more effective for use in learning mathematics class V SDN 52 Bengkulu. This research is a quantitative research. The research design used was quasi experimental research. Type of Research Design is the Pretest-Posttest Matching Comparison Group Design. In this design two tests were conducted, before and time to provide treatment  in the experimental class. The population in this research is the students of class V SDN 52 Bengkulu city. Sampling technique using purposive sampling. The sample selected is the VA class as the experimental class 1, and the VC class as the experimental class 2. The data completion instrument used is a short test provided through the pretest (Before the learning took place) and posttest (after the learning took place). Data of this research are analyzed using inferential statistic that is t-test. From result of research result of t test equal to 1,73> t table equal to 1,67 at significant level 5%. So it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in the learning outcomes of students of grade V SDN 52 Bengkulu on learning mathematics between students who use the images media with students who use concrete media.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ningtyas, N., Gunawan, A., & Hambali, D. (2019). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Pemanfaatan Media Gambar Dan Media Konkret Di Kelas V SDN 52 Kota Bengkulu. JURIDIKDAS: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.33369/juridikdas.1.3.%p

References

  1. Abadi. 2011. “Pengertian, Manfaat dan Jenis Media Pembelajaran”. http://edu tech .esy.es/ pengertian- manfaat- dan- jenis- media- pembelajran/. Diunduh pada tanggal 29 Januari 2017.
  2. Asyhar, Rayandra. 2011. Kreatif Mengambangkan Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Gaung Persada.
  3. Bachtiar, Harsja W. 2014. Media Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  4. Daryanto. 2016. Media Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
  5. Depdiknas. (2007). Pedoman Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
  6. Kamsiyatun. 2014. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan. “Pemanfaatan Media Gambar Untuk Meningkatkan HasilBelajar Matematika Siswa”. Vol.5, No.2, Mei 2014.
  7. Perna, Robert. 2014. Jurnal Internasional Matematika. “Pengembangan Keterampilan Matematika Kompleks”.165-185.23 Maret 2014.
  8. Rohani. 2004. Cara Belajar yang Efektif. Pekalongan: Cinta Ilmu.
  9. Sagala, syaipul. 2006. Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  10. Septiati. 2011. “Kelebihan Media Tiga Dimensi”. http://www.docstoc.ac.id/. Diunduh pada tanggal 29 Januari 2017.
  11. Shalih, Ismail. 2013. “Karakteristik Media Pembelajaran Konkret”. https://www. google.com /amp/s/ismail403. wordpress.com/2013/01/06/karakteristik-media-pembelajaran-tiga-dimensi/amp/?client=ms-opera-mobile&espv =1. Diunduh pada tanggal 29 Januari 2017.
  12. Sudjana, Nana. 2006. Tuntunan Penyusunan Karya Ilmiah. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo.
  13. Sudjana, Nana. 2007. Media Pengajaran. Bandung: Rosda.
  14. Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  15. Sumantri, Mulyani dan Nana Syaodih. 2006. Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
  16. Suprijono, Agus. 2009. Cooperative Learning. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
  17. Winarni, Endang Widi. 2011. Penelitian Pendidikan. Bengkulu: UNIB Press.
  18. Winataputra, Udin S. 2005. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.