Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the learning outcomes of PBL method with conventional methods and especially gender. This research was conducted at SMAN 12 Sijunjung. The research was carried out as much as 2x45 minutes according to the lesson hours. This type of research is Quasi Experiment Research or quasi-experimental. The main object in this study were male and female students in SMAN 12 Sijunjung. The results showed that with the application of problem-based learning (PBL) children would become more active, creative and innovative in learning PJOK, and create equal understanding and interest in PJOK subjects. To improve the quality of learning more effectively, the teacher must better understand the PJOK learning strategy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Marheni, E., Purnomo, E., & Jermaina, N. (2020). The Influence Of Project Based Learning, Learning Outcomes And Gender In Learning Sport Physical And Health (PJOK) In Schools. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 4(2), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v4i2.12412

References

  1. Gorely, T., Holroyd, R., & Kirk, D. (2003). Muscularity, the Habitus and the Social Construction of Gender: Towards a gender-relevant physical education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(4), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690301923
  2. Marheni, E., Purnomo, E., & Intan Cahyani, F. (2019). The Role of Motivation in Increasing Achievement: Perspective Sports Psychology. 7(Icssh 2018), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.2991/icssh-18.2019.14
  3. Marheni, E., S, A., & Purnomo, E. (2019). Application of Character Building with Physical Education (CBPE). Suluah Bendang: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 20(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.24036/sb.0400
  4. Valley, J. A., & Graber, K. C. (2017). Gender-biased communication in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(4), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2016-0160
  5. Viciana, J., Mayorga-Vega, D., & Parra-Saldías, M. (2019). Adolescents’ physical activity levels on physical education and non-physical education days according to gender, age, and weight status. European Physical Education Review, 25(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X17706683
  6. World Health Organization. (2018). How much of physical activity is recommended? https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/physical-activity
  7. Badar, I. T. (2014). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif, dan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
  8. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based Learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43.
  9. Connell, R. W. (1983) Which Way Is Up? Essays on sex, class and culture (Sydney, Allen & Unwin).
  10. Deem, R. & Gilroy, S. (1998) Physical activity, life-long learning and empowerment—situating sport in women’s leisure, Sport, Education and Society, 3, pp. 89–104.
  11. Hickey, C., Fitzclarence, L. & Matthews, R. (Eds) (1998) Where the Boys Are: masculinity, sport and education (Geelong, Deakin University Press).
  12. Kay, T. (1995) Women and Sport—a review of research (London, Sports Council).
  13. Koca, C. 2005. Gender Role Orientation of Athletes and Nonathletes in a Patriarchal society. a Study in Turkey: Journal Reasearch. Volume 4.
  14. Macdonald, Mandy dan Sprenger, Ellen. 1997. Gender dan Perubahan Organisasi. Yogyakarta: Insist Press
  15. Mahanal, S. 2008. Pengembangan Perangkat pembelajaran deteksi Kualitas Sungai dengan Indikator Biologi Berbasis Konstruktivistik untuk Memberdayakan Berpikir Kritis dan Sikap Siswa SMA terhadap ekosistem Sungai di Malang. Unpublished dissertation. Malang: Magister Program Malang State University.
  16. Milla Minhatul Maula, Jekti Prihatin, Kamalia Fikri. 2014. Pengaruh Model PjBL (Project-Based Learning) terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Materi Pengelolaan Lingkungan. Bandung: Jember University (UNEJ). Unpublished article.
  17. Mosse, Julia Cleves. 2007. Gender dan Pembangunan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  18. MZ, Zubaidah Amir. 2013. Perspektif Gender Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung: Pendidikan Indonesia University Bandung. Marwah Vol. XII No.1
  19. Nasirudin, Nanang, Setiawan, Ipang, & Yani, Ahmad. 2016. Modul Program Guru Pembelajar PJOK SMP Kelompok Kompetensi Pedagogik ? F. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru Dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan
  20. Suherman, Ayi. 2014. Implementasi Kurikulum Baru Tahun 2013 Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani (Studi Deskriptif Kualitatif pada SDN Cilengkrang). Sumedang: Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, Volume 1 Nomor 1 April 2014
  21. Supriyanto, Agus. 2008. Pembentukan Karakter Olahragawan Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender, Peran Serta Orangtua, Guru, Pelatih Olahraga Dan Keikutsertaan Dalam Aktivitas Olahraga Serta Jenis Olahraganya. Yogyakarta: Pendidikan Kepelatihan FIK UNY. Makalah ini disampaikan dalam rangka seminar olahraga Nasional ke II 8 November 2008 FIK UNY.
  22. Suryabrata, S. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Gravindo Persada.
  23. Tahar, Fahriah. 2012. Pengaruh Diskriminasi Gender Dan Pengalaman Terhadap Profesionalitas Auditor. Makassar: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar.
  24. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A Review ff Research on Project-Based Learning.