Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 15, 2020
Accepted
September 27, 2020
Published
September 27, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 135 Download : 133

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the level of understanding of teachers in physical education, sports, and health in Line 20 Muara Padang District about K13 Learning. The research method used in this research is descriptive quantitative. The sample in this study were junior high schools in Line 20, Muara Padang district, Banyuasin district with a total of 20 teachers. This study uses 3 indicators, namely understanding the PJOK learning syllabus in the 2013 curriculum, understanding the principles of RPP preparation in learning PJOK in the 2013 curriculum, and understanding the methods of learning PJOK in the 2013 curriculum. The results showed that at the junior high school level understanding the PJOK learning syllabus in the curriculum 2013 got an average value of 54.2 of 55.% and was included in the high category.

Keywords

syllabus lesson plans learning methods 2013 curriculum

Article Details

License
 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Fikri, A., & Hardiyono, B. (2020). The Level Of Teachers Understanding In Physical Education, Sports And Health About The 2013 Curriculum. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 4(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v4i2.12500
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Arief Sultoni, Moch. (2015). Implementation of 2013 Curriculum Subject at Junior High School Level Corner in One Roof Schools on Gili Ketapang Island and Probolinggo Regency. Journal of Sports and Health Education Volume 03 Number 02 Year 2015, 243 - 248
  2. Cronin, LD., Allen, J., Mulvenna, C & Russell, P (2017). An investigation of the relationships between the teaching climate, students' perceived life skills development and well-being within physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 23 (2). https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2017.1371684
  3. Krisdianto Ikak (2017), Survey of Pjok Teacher's Level of Understanding Against the Implementation of 2013 Curriculum Revision of Pjok Subjects in Junior High Schools, Senior High Schools in Dawarblandong Mojokerto District in 2017. Journal of Sports and Health Education Volume 05 Number 03 of 2017, 595 - 599
  4. Jung, Jinhong, .Ressler, James ,. Linder, Amy. (2018). Exploring the Hidden Curriculum in Physical Education. Advances in Physical Education. 8 (2). 253-262. DOI: 10.4236 / ape.2018.82023
  6. Kadir Abdul, et al. 2012.Basics of Education. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada, Media Group.
  8. Absolutely, Ali. 2012. Research Methodology in Sports. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
  9. Mendikbud. 2014. Teacher Training Materials for the Implementation of 2013 Curriculum for the 2014/2015 academic year, PJOK SMP / MTs for Teachers, Center for Educator Professional Development. Education and Culture Human Resources Development Agency and Education Quality Assurance, Ministry of Education and Culture.
  10. Noah, Mohammad. 2013. Sowing Civilization Creators. Jakarta: Zaman.
  11. OECD. (2019). Making Physical Education Dynamic and Inclusive for 2030: International Curriculum Analysis. Paris. Center français d'exploitation du droit de copie.
  12. Political and Economic Risk Consultant (PERC) Score of Good Corporate Governance in Asian Countries in 2012 (www.asiarisk.com).
  13. Prihantoro, C. Rudy. (2015). The perspective of the curriculum in Indonesia on environmental education. International Journal of Research Studies in Education. Volume 4 Number 1, 77-83
  14. Rizaldi, Taufik. (2015). Theory of Education Related to the Curriculum. (On line). Downloaded from http://taufikrizaldi.blogs.uny.ac.id/2015/11/04/teori-pend Pendidikan-yang-berhubungan-dengan-kurriculum/ [access date November 4, 2015]
  15. Sprake, A. and Temple, C. (2016) Physical Education or Physical Entertainment: where's the education in PE? Journal of Qualitative Research in Sports Studies, 10, 1, 157-176
  16. Sugiyono. 2010. Quantitative Research Methods, Qualitative, and R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta
  18. Sujarwo. (2013). Education in Indonesia is poor. WUNY Scientific Journal. XV, 1.
  19. Tilaar, HAR 2012. Kaleidoscope of National Education. Jakarta: Gramedia.
  20. Law No. 20 of 2003 on the National Education System. Jakarta: Depdiknas (2003).
  21. Ujiyanti, Tatak Prapti. 2009. Basic Education Reform in Indonesia. Policy Assessment, The Indonesian Institute
  22. Yuliani, (2016). Education in Indonesia in the Human Development Index (HDI). PPKn Scientific Rontal Journal, Volume 2, No. 2