Article Sidebar

Submitted
February 8, 2022
Accepted
March 17, 2022
Published
March 19, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 138 Download : 120

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Competence of a teacher should have been obtained when studying in college. However, college students or preservice teachers feel lack of competence during their study in college. It is important for colleges to provide a learning experience for students to have competence in teaching before they become a teacher. Sport Education (SE) has its own uniqueness because in its implementation, it can directly include several learning models as a provision to teach students when becoming a teacher. The purpose of this study was to determine the enjoyment of students using SE based on the characteristics of SE, increased skills and understanding of sports, and the pleasure of using SE. This research uses survey type of descriptive methods. Participants of this study are 35 college students who will finish their studies in the eastern part of West Java province. The instrument of this study used the Sport Education Season Survey. Data analyzing techniques employed in this study were descriptive statistics and paired samples t-test. The results of the study stated that college students enjoyed the use of SE based on the characteristics of SE, that college students have increased skills and understanding of sports, and that college students preferred SE compared to conventional learning. Further investigation related to college students teaching skills in the use of SE needs to be conducted.

Keywords

College Preservice Sport Education preservice sport education college

Article Details

License
 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Solihin, A. O., Ginanjar, A., & Budiman, A. (2022). The Involvement of Preservice Teachers in Delivering of Sport Education. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 6(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v6i1.20641
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. André, M. H., & Hastie, P. (2017). Sport Education in a Higher Education physical activity course. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 3(6), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.583365
  2. Darmadi, H. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Alfabeta.
  3. Deenihan, J. T., & Macphail, A. (2013). A Preservice Teacher ’ s Delivery of Sport Education : Influences , Difficulties and Continued Use. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 32(2), 166–185. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.32.2.166
  4. Ginanjar, A. (2015). The Influence of Inquiry Method in Motivating the SMP’ Student. Jurnal Kependidikan, 45(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jk.v45i2.7489
  5. Ginanjar, A. (2018). Pengaruh Sport Education Model Bulu Tangkis Terhadap Orientasi Olahraga Siswa SMP. BIORMATIKA, 4(2), 280–287.
  6. Ginanjar, A. (2019a). Implementasi Praktis Sport Education Model. Program Studi Pendidikan Jasmani Kesehatan dan Rekreasi STKIP Nahdlatul Ulama Indramayu.
  7. Ginanjar, A. (2019b). Pengaruh Sport Education Model dan Tingkat Fundamental Movement Skill terhadap Aktivitas Fisik dan Kompetitif dalam Pendidikan Jasmani. Disertasi. Bandung: Pendidikan Olahraga SPs Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
  8. Ginanjar, A., Suherman, A., Juliantine, T., & Hidayat, Y. (2018). Competitive in Physical Education Using Sports Education Model. 3rd International Conference on Sports Science, Health and Physical Education.
  9. Ginanjar, A., Suherman, A., Juliantine, T., & Hidayat, Y. (2019a). Sports Orientation during Learning Team or Individual Sports using A Sport Education Model. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.24021
  10. Ginanjar, A., Suherman, A., Juliantine, T., & Hidayat, Y. (2019b). The Effect of Sport Education Model in Badminton Game on Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity of Junior High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Dan Olahraga, 4(3), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpjo.v4i2.16166
  11. Hakim, L. Al, & Ginanjar, A. (2017). Pengaruh Gaya Mengajar Guided Discovery dan Gaya Mengajar Komando Terhadap Disiplin Siswa SMA. Jurnal Kependidikan Jasmani Dan Olahraga, 1(1), 26–32.
  12. Hanansyah, A., & Ginanjar, A. (2019). Improvement Of Basketball Learning Results Using Group Investigation Learning Model. JUARA : Jurnal Olahraga, 4(2), 90–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33222/juara.v4i2.543 Info
  13. Hartono, R., Suherman, A., & Rusdiana, A. (2014). Pengaruh Model Sport Education Terhadap Motivasi dan Intensitas Belajar Gerak Siswa Pada Penjasorkes. Edusentris, 1(3), 213–226.
  14. Hastie, P. A., & Sinelnikov, O. A. (2006). Russian students ’ participation in and perceptions of a season of Sport Education. European Physical Education Review, 12(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X06065166
  15. Hordvik, M. M., Macphail, A., & Ronglan, L. T. (2017). Teaching and Learning Sport Education : A Self-Study Exploring the Experiences of a Teacher Educator and Pre-Service Teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(2), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2016-0166
  16. Ko, B., Wallhead, T., & Ward, P. (2006). Chapter 4: Professional development workshops - What do teachers learn and use? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25(4), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.25.4.397
  17. Kurniawan, R., & Suherman, A. (2015). Penerapan SEM ( Sport Education Model ) dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2013. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1, 367–378.
  18. Lazuardi, W. A. (2015). Kurangnya Profesionnalisme Guru Pendidikan Jasmani Di Sekolah Dasar. Seminar Nasional Profesionalisme Tenaga Profesi PJOK, 433–443.
  19. Luguetti, C., Lopes, P., Sobrinho, D. R. de S., Carbinatto, M. V., & Macphail, A. (2018). The complexity , tensions and struggles in developing learning communities throughout a Sport Education season. European Physical Education Review, 25(4), 1075–1092. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X18802285
  20. Maksum, A. (2008). Kualitas Guru Pendidikan Jasmani di Sekolah : Antara Harapan dan Kenyataan.
  21. Mcmahon, E., & Macphail, A. (2007). Learning to teach sport education : The experiences of a pre-service teacher. European Physical Education Review, 13(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X07076878
  22. Metzler, M. W. (2000). Intructional Models for Physical Education. Allyn and Bacon.
  23. Metzler, M. W. (2005). Instructional Models for Physical Education (2nd ed.). Holcomb Hathaway.
  24. Mohr, D. J., Townsend, J. S., Rairigh, R. M., & Mohr, C. F. (2003). Students ’ perceptions of sport education when taught using the pedagogical approach to sport education ( PASE ) planning and instructional framework. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74(1), A51–A51.
  25. Mooney, A., Moncrieff, K., & Hickey, C. (2018). Exploring pre-service teachers’ experience of Sport Education as an approach to transition pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(6), 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1485137
  26. Perlman, D. (2010). Change in Affect and Needs Satisfaction for Amotivated Students within the Sport Education Model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.29.4.433
  27. Perlman, D. (2012). The influence of the Sport Education Model on amotivated students’ in-class physical activity. European Physical Education Review, 18(3), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X12450795
  28. Pill, S. (2008). A Teachers’ Perceptions of the Sport Education Model as an Alternative for Upper Primary School Physical Education. ACHPER Australia Healthy Lifestyles Journal, 55(2), 23–29.
  29. Saputro, A. Y. (2018). Kompetensi guru pendidikan jasmani SMA bersertifikasi tahun 2009-2010 dalam pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Indonesia, 14(2), 69–83.
  30. Siedentop, D. (1994). Sport education: quality PE through positive sport experiences. Human Kinetics.
  31. Siedentop, D. (1998). What is Sport Education and How Does it Work? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69(4), 18–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1998.10605528
  32. Siedentop, D. (2002). Sport Education: A Retrospective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.21.4.409
  33. Siedentop, D., Hastie, P. A., & Mars, H. van der. (2011). Complete Guide to Sport Education. Human Kinetics.
  34. Sinelnikov, O. A., & Hastie, P. A. (2008). Teaching sport education to Russian students: An ecological analysis. European Physical Education Review, 14(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X08090706
  35. Sinelnikov, O. A., & Hastie, P. A. (2010). A motivational analysis of a season of Sport Education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980902729362
  36. UU RI No. 14. (2005). Guru dan Dosen. Republik Indonesia.
  37. UU RI No. 20. (2003). Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Republik Indonesia.
  38. Wallhead, T., & O’sullivan, M. (2005). Sport Education: physical education for the new millennium? Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 10(2), 181–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980500105098