Main Article Content

Abstract

This research described geographic Teacher’s perpormance at SMA Negeri 1 Kepahiang. This Research used descriptive qualitative method. Which emprasize on the real description and the truth of teacher’s perpormance in learning geography at SMA Negeri 1 Kepahiang. The main subject of this Research is geography Teacher’s. The result of this research indicate that teacher’s perpormance in learning geography had covered; 1) The design of learning geography had conduct by the 10­th grade socrety teacher’s with arrage the syllabus and learning implementation draft contarned: Subject indentity, Standard competence, Basic competence, Indicator of achievement competence learning pupose, lesson materrals, Time allocation learning method, Study resources, The study result assessment. 2) The geography learning implementation held from introduction, contetnt, and closing activities. 3)The geography learning evaluation had done by teacher appropriate with assessment orientation, and the development of result study with remedial and enrichment activities. Based on the result of this research it could be concluded that teacher perpormancein learning geography societyprogram wich heid by the geography teacher’s in 10th grade at SMA Negeri 1 Kepahiang.

Article Details

References

  1. Abdul, M. (2005). Perencanaan Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Standard Kompetensi Guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  2. Agus, S. (2009). Kooperatif Learning Teori dan Aplikasi Paikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  3. Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The Influence of the Transformational Leadership and Work Motivation on Teachers Performance. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7).
  4. Depdiknas. (2008). Kriteria dan Indikator Keberhasilan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Dikti.
  5. Fitria, H., Kristiawan, M., & Rahmat, N. (2019). Upaya Meningkatkan Kompetensi Guru Melalui Pelatihan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. ABDIMAS UNWAHAS, 4(1).
  6. Hamalik, O. (2008). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  7. Hamid, H. (1992). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
  8. Hasanah, M. L., & Kristiawan, M. (2019). Supervisi Akademik dan Bagaimana Kinerja Guru. Tadbir: Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2), 97-112.
  9. Isyandi, B. (2004). Manajemen Manusia Dalam Perspektif Global. UNRI Press, Pekanbaru
  10. Khasanah, U., Kristiawan, M., & Tobari. (2019). The Implementation of Principals’ Academic Supervision In Improving Teachers’ Professionalism in the State Primary Schools. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(8).
  11. Kristiawan, M., Suryanti, I., Muntazir, M., & Ribuwati, A. (2018). Inovasi Pendidikan. Jawa Timur: Wade Group National Publishing.
  12. Kristiawan, M., & Rahmat, N. (2018). Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru Melalui Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(2), 373-390.
  13. Murtiningsih, M., Kristiawan, M., & Lian, B. (2019). The Correlation Between Supervision of Headmaster and Interpersonal Communication With Work Ethos of the Teacher. European Journal of Education Studies.
  14. Renata, R., Wardiah, D., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The Influence of Headmaster’s Supervision and Achievement Motivation on Effective Teachers. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(4).
  15. Salwa., Kristiawan, M., & Lian, B. (2019). The Effect of Academic Qualification, Work Experience and Work Motivation towards Primary School Principal Performance. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(8).
  16. Supardi. (2014). Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grapindo Persada.
  17. Suparlan. (2005). Menjadi Guru Efektif. Yogyakarta: Hikayat
  18. Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
  19. Usman, M. U. (2010). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya