Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 7, 2019
Accepted
August 7, 2019
Published
April 1, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 78 Download : 74

Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract: Semantic mapping has been demonstrated as practical teaching and learning technique for students at all grade levels. However, its use for speaking class has been relatively unexplored. The objective of this study is to investigate the influence of semantic mapping as a technique to improve students’ speaking ability. The research design of this study was quasi experimental design. The population comprised the seventh grade students of SMP Taba Renah, Musi Rawas in the academic year of 2015/2016 and the sample consisted of 44 students. The data were collected via test, observation and interview. In analyzing the data, for the pre-test it was found that there were not significant differences in speaking competence and its components in experimental and control class because P > 0.05. For the post-test, it was found that for total speaking competence P-value is 0.018, for vocabulary in speaking P-value is 0.001, for fluency in speaking P-value is 0.033, for pronunciation in speaking P-value is 0.060, and for grammar in speaking P-value is 0.348. So, there were significant differences in experimental & control class in vocabulary and fluency aspects because P < 0.05 but there were not significant difference in pronunciation and grammar aspects because P > 0.05. The finding shows that semantic mapping as technique is effective to be implemented in teaching English to improve students’ speaking ability, especially in vocabulary and fluency aspects but it is not in pronunciation and grammar

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Syafrizal Syafrizal, Safnil Safnil, I Wayan Dharmayana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Syafrizal, S., Safnil, S., & Dharmayana, I. W. (2017). DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ SPEAKING COMPETENCE BY USING SEMANTIC MAPPING THROUGH COLLABORATIVE LEARNING TECHNIQUE. TRIADIK, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.33369/triadik.v16i1.8661
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. REFERENCES
  2. Abdollahzadeh, Esmaeel. (2009). The effect of semantic mapping as a vocabulary instruction technique on EFL learners with different perceptual learning styles. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 1-27
  3. Developing Students’ Speaking Competence By Using Semantic Mapping
  4. Alber, S.R., & Foil, C.R. (2002). Fun and effective ways to build your students' vocabulary. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37(3), 131-139.
  5. Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by principles. An interactive approach to language pedagogy, second edition. New York, NY: Longman Inc.
  6. Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Hall, T., & Strangman, N. (2002). Graphic organizer. national center on accessing the general curriculum. Retrieved September 20, 2015 from ttp://www.lsus.edu/Documents/ Offices%20and%20Services/Student%20Development%20and%20Counseling%20Center/graphic%20organizers.pdf
  8. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Indriarti. (2014). The effectiveness of semantic mapping strategy to improve students’ vocabulary mastery. Journal of English language teaching. Forum 3(1). Retrieved August 21, 2015 from: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php
  10. Insyirah, L., & Ernidawati. (2014). The effect of semantic mapping strategy on students speaking achievement. In http://digilib.unimed. ac.id/the-effect-of-semantic-mapping-strategy-on-students-speaking-achievement-in-smp-negeri-1-sei-suka 35919.html
  11. Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2000). Educational research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  12. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2014). Paparan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI- Press Workshop: Implementasi kurikulum 2013. Jakarta. http://kemdikbud.go.id/kemdikbud/node/2070
  13. Mah, B.Y. (2011). Semantic mapping: A visual and structured pre-writing strategy in the process of essay writing. ESTEEM academic journal UiTM Pulau Pinang, 7, 81–92.
  14. Mardiana, Afriyani, Latifah & Hotimah. (2015). The low motivation of students in learning English foreign language in the context of speaking. Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University. Retrieved October 13, 2015 from https://www.academia.edu/4766541
  15. Mason, E.J., & Bramble, W.J. (1997). Research in education and the behavioral sciences: Concepts and methods. New York, NY: Brown and Benchmark.
  16. Nejati, R., & Pejman, A. (2015). Beyond a “What Works” technique: The case of semantic mapping. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW)
  17. Nyoni, E. (2012). Semantically enhanced composition writing with learners of English as a second language (ESL). International journal of humanities and social science, 2, 264-274.
  18. Reza, M.M. (2012). The role of semantic mapping as a while-reading activity in improving reading comprehension ability of the Iranian University students in General English (GE) Courses. Theory and practice in language studies, 2(11), 2422-2429.
  19. Sadeghi, K., & Taghavi, E. (2014). The relationship between semantic mapping instruction, reading comprehension and recall of Iranian undergraduates reading English texts. Mextesol Journal, 38(1), 1-13.
  20. Sirkin, R.M. (1999). Statistics for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage ISBN 0761914196
  21. Sujana. (1996). Metode statistika, Bandung: Tarsito, p. 239
  22. Zacharias, N.T. (2003). A survey of tertiary teachers’ beliefs about English language teaching in Indonesia with regard to the role of English as a global language. MA-ELT thesis. Bangkok: University of Thailand.
  23. Zamzali. (2008). Statistic pendidikan. Bengkulu, Indonesia: FKIP Unib.