STAKEHOLDERS MAPPING ANALYSIS IN HANDLING COVID-19 IN BENGKULU CITY

Authors

  • Jatmiko Yogopriyatno Universitas Bengkulu
  • Kahar Hakim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33369/ispaj.v3i1.22468

Abstract

Stakeholder analysis has an important role in designing, implementing, and evaluating the COVID-19 handling program in Bengkulu City. The research design used in this study is a qualitative descriptive research design. The location of this research was held in Bengkulu City. This study observes four aspects that are used as instruments in observing Stakeholder analysis is becoming increasingly important that the policies for handling COVID-19 in Bengkulu City are identification, analysis, mapping and prioritization. The population of this research is the entire Bengkulu City COVID-19 Handling Acceleration. Meanwhile, the informants in this study were conducted using the key informant technique. In collecting data the author uses techniques, by conducting, interviews, documentation. Data analysis technique is done by interactive analysis. Stakeholders involved in handling Covid-19 in Bengkulu City show that Health Workers, TNI Police, and Volunteers are in quadrant 1, namely as key players; BPBD, Health Service, Social Service for Covid patients are in quadrant 2 as subjects; Mayor, Kodim 0407, and Kapolresta, and Media are in quadrant 3 as context; NGOs, Business, and Society are in quadrant 4 as Crowd. The pattern of stakeholder collaboration in handling Covid-19 in Bengkulu City is based on the pentaholicx model, which involves five elements, namely the government, the private sector, religious organizations, universities, and the media. The factors that hinder stakeholders in efforts to deal with Covid-19 in Bengkulu City are First, citizens' ignorance of the dangers of COVID-19, Second, the existence of an interest in meeting the needs of life, resulting in some residents ignoring physical or social distancing orders.

References

Aligica, Paul Dragos. 2006. Institutional and Stakeholder Mapping: Frameworks for Policy Analysis and Institutional Change. Public Organiz Rev (2006) 6: 79–90.

Bryson, John M. 2003. What To Do When Stakeholders Matter: A Guide to Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques. University of Minnesota.

Bryson, John M. 2004. What to do stakeholders matter; stakeholder identification and analysis techniques, Public Management Review, Vol. 6 Issue1.

Miles, M.B., dan A.M. Huberman. Qualitative Data Analysis 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 1994.

Mintzberg, H. 1999. Who Should Control Operation ? In: Minzberg., H. Quinn, J.B. & Ghoshal, S. The Strategy Process. Harlow.: Pearson Education Ltd

Nicole Kennon, Peter Howden and Meredith Hartley (2009), Who Really Matters? A stakeholder analysis tool, Extension Farming Systems Journal, Vol 5 No 2.

Reed, Mark S, et.al. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (2009). Page 1933–1949.

Schiffer, Eva. 2007. Net-Map Toolbox Influence Mapping of Social Networks. Greece:International Food Policy Research Institute.

World Health Organization. Health Service Planning and Policy Making: A toolking for Nursen and Midwives. (Module 2 Stakeholder Analysis and Networks).

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles