Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 16, 2022
Published
September 30, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 105 Download : 111

Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRAK


 


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui persentase kesesuaian materi dalam buku pelajaran fisika kelas x dengan kategori literasi sains sebagai batang tubuh pengetahuan, penyelidikan, cara berpikir, dan interaksi sains, teknologi dengan masyarakat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dengan metode deskriptif. Teknik pengumpulan data yaitu analisis isi (content analysis) dengan metode deskriptif kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian pada buku fisika kelas X (Erlangga) menyajikan kategori literasi sains sebagai batang tubuh pengetahuan (46%); sains sebagai penyelidikan (14%); sains sebagai cara berpikir (25%); dan interaksi sains, teknologi dengan masyarakat (5%). Untuk buku buku fisika kelas X (Yudhistira) menyajikan kategori literasi sains sebagai batang tubuh pengetahuan (50%); sains sebagai penyelidikan (14%); sains sebagai cara berpikir (24%); dan interaksi sains, teknologi dengan masyarakat (12%). Dari data tersebut, kedua buku fisika kelas X yang digunakan dalam proses pembelajaran lebih menekankan pada kategori sains sebagai batang tubuh pengetahuan.


 


Kata kunci: Analisis, Literasi sains, Buku Ajar


 


ABSTRACT


This research aims to determine the percentage of material alignment in 10th-grade physics textbooks with the category of science literacy as a body of knowledge, research, ways of thinking, and interaction of science and technology with society. The objects of this study are 10th-grade physics textbooks. The population in this study is all material in textbooks were analyzed. The data collection technique is content analysis. Data analysis techniques are by quantitative descriptive methods. The use of multistage sampling provided sampling by using two stages. The first stage is the selection of chapters of each book analyzed, and the second stage is the selection of pages of each chapter analyzed. The findings from (1) the Erlangga book present the category of science literacy as(a) the body of knowledge (46%); an investigation (14%); the way of thinking (25%); and (15%) the interaction of science, technology with society, and (2) the Yudhistira book presents the category of science literacy as (a) the body of knowledge (50%), (b) an investigation (14%); (c) a way of thinking (24%); and (d) the interaction of science, technology with society (12%).


Keywords: Analysis, Textbook, Category Science Literacy

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

• Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

AMPLITUDO: Jurnal Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Fisika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

References

  1. Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik (Ed. Rev. V). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  2. Chiappetta, E. L., & Fillman, D. A. (2007). Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1847–1868. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601159407.
  3. Chiappetta, E. L., Sethna, G. H., & Fillman, D. A. (1993). Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300714.
  4. Collette, A. T., & Chiappetta, E. L. (1994). Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools. The CV Mosby, 11830 Westline Industrial Drive, St. Louis, MO 63146. 514.
  5. Davis, E. A, & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Research, 34(April), 3–14.
  6. Firman, H. (2007). Laporan analisis literasi sains berdasarkan hasil PISA nasional tahun 2006. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Balitbang Depdiknas.
  7. Garcia, T. D. (1985). An analysis of earth science textbooks for presentation of aspects of scientific literacy. International. 300.
  8. Huda N. Analisis buku ajar biologi kelas x SMA berdasarkan literasi sains. 2017;93(I):259.
  9. Kanginan, Marthen. (2006). Fisika SMA untuk kelas X. Jakarta: Erlangga.
  10. Keeble, D., & Wilkinson, F. (1999). Collective learning and knowledge development in the evolution of regional clusters of high technology SMEs in Europe. Regional Studies, 33(4), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950081167.
  11. Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology (IJEMST), 1(3), 138–147.
  12. Lumpe, A. T., & Beck, J. (1996). A profile of high school biology textbooks using scientific literacy recommendations. The American Biology Teacher, 58(3), 147–153.
  13. Mochamad Irsyan S, Setiawan A, Rusnayati H. Analisis buku ajar fisika SMA kelas X di kota Bandung berdasarkan komponen literasi sains. Prosidings Semin Nas Fis 2013. 2013;94–102.
  14. OECD. (2019). Programme for international student assessment (PISA) results from PISA 2018. Oecd, 1–10.
  15. Putra, M. I. S., Widodo, W., & Jatmiko, B. (2016). The development of guided inquiry science learning materials to improve science literacy skill of prospective mi teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5794.
  16. Ruwanto, Bambang. (2016). Fisika SMA kelas X. Jakarta: Yudistira.
  17. T. E. Yuliyanti, A. R. (2014). Analisis buku ajar fisika sma kelas xi berdasarkan muatan literasi sains di Kabupaten Tegal. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/upej.v3i2.3597.
  18. Tarigan, H. G., & Tarigan, D. (1986). Telaah buku teks Bahasa Indonesia. Angkasa. 154.