Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 308 Download : 625

Main Article Content

Abstract

Artikel ini mengeksplorasi penguatan Perjanjian Paris melalui kepemimpinan negara maju, dengan fokus pada janji partai Labour untuk memimpin aksi iklim global. Perjanjian Paris, diadopsi pada COP21 pada 2015, melibatkan hampir semua negara untuk mengatasi perubahan iklim. Prinsip "common but differentiated responsibilities" (CBDR) menyoroti tanggung jawab berbeda antara negara maju dan berkembang berdasarkan kapasitas dan kontribusi historis mereka. Analisis ini menyoroti bagaimana janji partai Labour untuk mencapai net-zero emissions pada tahun 2050 dan kebijakan terkait dapat memperkuat implementasi Perjanjian Paris. Kepemimpinan negara maju seperti Inggris, Jerman, dan Swedia, yang menunjukkan komitmen ambisius dalam aksi iklim, diulas untuk menunjukkan dampak positif terhadap komitmen global. Peningkatan komitmen hukum dan kebijakan ambisius dari negara maju diperlukan untuk mencapai tujuan iklim global. Dukungan finansial dan teknologi dari negara maju kepada negara berkembang diperlukan untuk memastikan kapasitas negara berkembang dalam mengimplementasikan aksi iklim yang efektif. Rekomendasi meliputi peningkatan target NDC, penegakan hukum yang kuat, dan kolaborasi global yang inklusif dengan partisipasi sektor swasta dan masyarakat sipil.

Keywords

Perjanjian Paris Negara Maju Partai Labour

Article Details

How to Cite
Septaria, E. (2024). Penguatan Perjanjian Paris Melalui Kepemimpinan Negara Maju : Analisis Janji Partai Labour. Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei, 23(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.33369/jik.v23i1.35808
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Agustinus Prajaka Wahyu Baskara. (2023). Kerangka Hukum Bursa Karbon Di Indonesia: Perkembangan Terkini Dan Tantangan Ke Depan. Mimbar Hukum, 35(2), 40–79.
  2. Alisya Afifah and others. (2024). Perubahan Iklim Dan Krisis Lingkungan: Tantangan Hukum Dan Peran Masyarakat, Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 364–75.
  3. Arie Afriansyah and Amira Bilqis. (2020). Paris Agreement: Respon Terhadap Pendekatan Prinsip Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities Dalam Kyoto Protocol. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20.3 (2020), 391 <https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.391-408>.
  4. Bunga Putri Nauli. (2021) Masa Depan Kerja Sama Selatan-Selatan: Diantara Solidaritas Dan Kepentingan. Syntax Idea, 12(3), 25–31.
  5. Daniel Bodansky. (2016) ‘The Paris Agreement: A New Hope?’, American Journal of International Law, 110(2), 288–319.
  6. Jennifer Henderson and Diana Smallridge. (2019). Trade Finance Gaps in a Heightened Regulatory Environment: The Role of Development Banks. Global Policy, 10(3), 432–341.
  7. Jon Birger Skjærseth and others. (2021). The Paris Agreement and Key Actors Domestic Climate Policy Mixes: Comparative Patterns’, International Environmental Agreements. Politics, Law and Economics, 21(1), 59–73.
  8. Jonathan Pickering, Carola Betzold, and Jakob Skovgaard. (2017) Special Issue: Managing Fragmentation and Complexity in the Emerging System of International Climate Finance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(1), 1–16.
  9. Labour Party. (2020). Labour's Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution." Dikutip dari Labour.org.uk.
  10. Lavanya Rajamani. (2016) AMBITION and DIFFERENTIATION in the 2015 Paris AGREEMENT: INTERPRETATIVE POSSIBILITIES and UNDERLYING POLITICS. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 65(2), 493–514.
  11. Mairon G Bastos Lima and Joyeeta Gupta. (2013). Studying Global Environmental Meetings. Global Environmental Politics, 13(2), 46–64.
  12. Megan Kenyon. (2024, 14 Juni). Labour’s climate plans are under more scrutiny than ever. Diakses pada 08 Juli 2024, dari https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2024/06/labours-climate-plans-are-under-more-scrutiny-than-ever.
  13. Muhkamat Anwar. (2022). Green Economy Sebagai Strategi Dalam Menangani Masalah Ekonomi Dan Multilateral. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara (PKN), 4(1), 343–562
  14. Nicolas Kreibich and Lukas Hermwille. (2021) Caught in between: Credibility and Feasibility of the Voluntary Carbon Market Post-2020, Climate Policy, 21(7), 939–957.
  15. Pamela A. Matson and others. (2007) Annual Review of Environment and Resources: Preface. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2(1), 1–25.
  16. Protokol Kyoto. (1997). "Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change."
  17. Regina Anastasya and Septiani Banavsya Putri. (2024). ‘SDGs 7 : Efektivitas Program Penggunaan Bus Listrik Guna Mendorong Transportasi Publik Ramah Lingkungan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Sustainability, 1(3), 1–13.
  18. Robert Falkner. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–1125.
  19. Ryo Fujikura and Tomoyo Toyota, (2012). Climate Change Mitigation and Development Cooperation, Climate Change Mitigation and Development Cooperation, 2(1), 1–264.
  20. Sabina Nurseha and others. (2024). Urgensi Transisi Green Economyoleh Generasi Muda Terhadap Pengaruh Pembangunan Berkelanjutan’, Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 2(5), 133–51.
  21. Sebastian Oberthür and Lisanne Groen. (2017) The European Union and the Paris Agreement: Leader, Mediator, or Bystander?’. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(1), 1–8.
  22. Sterl, S., et al. (2020). A roadmap to decarbonize supply chains: Beyond the 'net-zero' promises of the 2020s. Nature Communications, 11(2), 50-94.
  23. Syafrizal Syaiful. (2023). Implikasi Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 Tentang Dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan Terhadap Keuangan Mikro. Jurnal Prodigy, 11(2), 25–45.
  24. Tumai Murombo. (2022). Regulatory Imperatives for Renewable Energy: South African Perspectives’. Journal of African Law, 66(1), 97–122.
  25. UNCED. (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development.
  26. UNFCCC. (2016) ‘Green Climate Fund’, <http://unfccc.int/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/green_climate_fund/items/5869.php>.
  27. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (1992)
  28. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (1992).
  29. W. P. Pauw and others. (2022) Post-2025 Climate Finance Target: How Much More and How Much Better?’. Climate Policy, 22(9), 124-151.
  30. Watson, C., & Schalatek, L. (2020). Climate finance for developing countries: Improving the global governance architecture. Climate Policy, 20(6), 670-686.