Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to examine the role of administrative law as an academic discipline in strengthening transparency and accountability in the public sector through a systematic literature review. A qualitative approach was employed using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) design, focusing on the search, selection, and analysis of scholarly publications and international reports related to administrative law, public information disclosure, and governance. The literature reviewed covers works published between 2010 and 2024, obtained from reputable scientific databases. The findings reveal that administrative law plays a dual role: as a normative framework and as a regulatory mechanism to ensure public information disclosure, prevent abuse of authority, and enhance bureaucratic accountability. Three key findings are identified: (1) legal frameworks governing public information disclosure provide legitimacy for transparency practices; (2) administrative law contributes to anti-corruption efforts through the implementation of digital systems such as e-procurement; and (3) the integration of administrative law with bureaucratic reform and global governance standards supports the development of modern, accountable governance. This study concludes that the success of transparency and accountability in the public sector is strongly influenced by the presence of a clear, consistent, and internationally aligned administrative legal framework.

Keywords

Hukum Administrasi Transparansi Akuntabilitas Tata Kelola Publik Systematic Literature Review

Article Details

How to Cite
Cahyo Nugroho, T., Khan, A. S. A., & Jaya, K. (2025). Peran Hukum Administrasi Negara sebagai Ilmu Pengetahuan dalam Membangun Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Sektor Publik. Jurnal Ilmiah Kutei, 24(2), 258–280. https://doi.org/10.33369/jik.v24i2.45000
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Andrews, Matt. The Limits of Institutional Reform in Development. Cambridge University Press, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060974.
  2. Bannister, Frank, and Regina Connolly. “ICT, Public Values and Transformative Government: A Framework and Programme for Research.” Government Information Quarterly 31, no. 1 (January 2014): 119–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002.
  3. Digital Government Review of Brazil. OECD Digital Government Studies. OECD, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307636-en.
  4. Dwiyanto, Agus, and Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. “Gadjah Mada University Press.” Yogyakarta, 2006.
  5. Effendi, S. Birokrasi Dan Reformasi Di Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2019.
  6. Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan G., and Albert J. Meijer. “Effects of Transparency on the Perceived Trustworthiness of a Government Organization: Evidence from an Online Experiment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24, no. 1 (January 2014): 137–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus048.
  7. Hedwig. “Optimalisasi Peran Hukum Administrasi Negara Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Praktik Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 4, no. 6 (September 12, 2024): 2223–37. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i6.2531.
  8. Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. The Worldwide Governance Indicators : Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5430.
  9. Kim, S. “E-Procurement and Anti-Corruption: The Case of South Korea.” Asian Journal of Public Administration 41, no. 2 (2019): 115–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02598272.2019.1639189.
  10. OECD. Digital Government Review of Brazil. OECD Digital Government Studies. OECD, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307636-en.
  11. Papaioannou, Diana, Anthea Sutton, and Andrew Booth. “Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review.” Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review, 2016, 1–336.
  12. Peters, B. Guy. “The Challenge of Policy Coordination.” Policy Design and Practice 1, no. 1 (January 2, 2018): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1437946.
  13. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. “Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - into the Age of Austerity.” Oxford University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198778589.001.0001.
  14. ———. “Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - into the Age of Austerity.” Oxford University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.1017/S002246341600037X.
  15. Saputra, Ahmad Arya, Muhammad Ariel Badrul Fallah, Victorina Puspita Indranarwasti, and Yohanes Asep Bintang Kosasih. “Analisis Regulasi Larangan Rangkap Jabatan Dalam Pemerintahan Indonesia Sebagai Dukungan Penerapan Good Corporate Governance.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 10, no. 14 (2024): 61–76. https://doi.org/records/13343212.
  16. Setiyono, B. “Transparency and Accountability in Public Procurement: Lessons from Indonesia.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 47, no. 3 (2016): 437–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S002246341600037X.
  17. Suhardono, A. “Regulasi Data Pribadi Dalam Tata Kelola Digital.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 51, no. 2 (2021): 201–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no2.2946.
  18. Tranfield, David, David Denyer, and Palminder Smart. “Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review.” British Journal of Management 14, no. 3 (September 16, 2003): 207–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
  19. Wibowo, Agus. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik. Semarang, 2025.
  20. ———. “Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Di Indonesia: Antara Regulasi Dan Implementasi.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 2 (2020): 145–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jih.v7i2.31042.
  21. WORTHY, BEN. “THE IMPACT OF OPEN DATA IN THE UK: COMPLEX, UNPREDICTABLE, AND POLITICAL.” Public Administration 93, no. 3 (September 21, 2015): 788–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12166.
  22. Zulkarnain, Rifa, and Ismaidar Ismaidar. “Politik Hukum Pengaturan Sistem Pemilu Proporsional Tertutup Sebagai Wujud Demokrasi Di Indonesia.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, no. 6 (2023): 9821–32. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i6.7622.