Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 7, 2020
Accepted
January 7, 2020
Published
January 7, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 124 Download : 190

Main Article Content

Abstract

General objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of activities done by Rafflesia Business Group at the North Bengkulu. And the specific purpose of this study was to determine the planning, implementation, efforts to increase its capabilities to the members in the group, infrastructure, and the evaluation of Business Group program. The method of this study was a qualitative method and the data collection techniques used was interview, observation and documentation. The subjects of this research was Rafflesia Business Group board consisted of Chairman, Secretary, Treasurer and Members. In order to prove the validity of the research, it was checked by using the triangulation of data sources, techniques and timing. Data were analyzed through three stages, which were data reduction, presentation and conclusion. The research found that the first, Rafflesia Business Group did not use specific standards in planning the program it was only seen from the public interest, the planning was done with the consensus of the members. Second, implementation, Rafflesia Business Group implemented the program in accordance with the initial plan that had been prepared in advance with the cooperation of members to achieve production. Third, the efforts to increase the member participation in the group, members of the business made another attempt at Business Group. But they were always working to improve Business Group program in order to create new innovations. Fourth, influence of infrastructure, KUBE Rafflesia had sufficient infrastructure and assist in achieving the results of Business Group’s program. Fifth evaluation, the evaluation was done associated with the planning done by the consensus of members, the implementation that was done matched with the advance planning in which the members were cooperated, the efforts to increased members participation in which they were always attempted to give new innovations for Business Group’s program, and the infrastructure supported in achieving the results of Business Group.

 

Keywords: Effectiveness, Business Group, entrepreneurship

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Wanda, D., Adbullah, I., & Parlan, P. (2020). EFEKTIVITAS KEGIATAN KELOMPOK USAHA BERSAMA (KUBE) RAFFLESIA KABUPATEN BENGKULU UTARA. Journal Of Lifelong Learning, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.33369/joll.2.1.1-6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aditama Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Metedologi Penelitian. Jakarta : Penerbit PT. Rineka Cipta.
  2. Danim, Sudarwan. 2002.Menjadi Peneliti Kualitatif ; Pustaka Setia
  3. Dinas Sosial Provinsi Yogyakarta. (2010). Kelompok Usaha Bersama (KUBE).
  4. Suryanto. 2010. Kelompok Usaha Bersama. [Online] Diaksesdarihttp://suryanto.blog.unair.ac.id/files/2010/01/kubepdf.pdf
  5. Hikmat, Hari. 2010. Strategi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Bandung: Humaniora Utama Press.
  6. J, Nasikun. 1995. Mencari Suatu Strategi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa Berparadigma Ganda, dalam Jefta Leibo, Sosiologi Pedesaan. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
  7. Makmur. 2011. Efektivitas Kebijakan Kelembagaan Pengawasan. Bandung: Refika
  8. (http: //digilib.unila.ac/7197/65/BABII.pdf (Diakses pada tanggal 10)
  9. Mardikanto, Totok. Dkk. 20013. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Public.Bandung: Alfabetta Cv.
  10. Moleong, Lexy J. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Kulaitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda karya.
  11. Visiunivesal. 2015. Konsep Program pendidikan kecakapan. [Online]
  12. Diaksesdarihttps://visiuniversal.blogspot.co.id/2015/01/konsep-program-pendidikan-kecakapan.html
  13. Peraturan pemerintah NO.73 Tahun 1991 Tentang Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. http://bp-bayupradikto.blogspot.co.id/2014/01/ketwrkaitan-antara-pendidikan-nonformal.html (Diakses pada tanggal 18 Oktober 2017)
  14. Siagian, P. 2005. Fungsi-Fungsi Manajerial. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  15. Sudjana. 2008. Evaluasi Program PLS. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset
  16. Sugiyono. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatid Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta,Cv.
  17. Sumarsono, Sonny. 2013. Kewirausahaan. Yogyakarta: Graha ilmu.
  18. GhafarArifRM.Abd. 2013. Prakarya Dan Kewirausahaan. [Online]
  19. Diaksesdarihttp://Abd.GhafarArifRM.blogspot.co.id/2013/12/prakarya-dan-kewirausahaan.html
  20. Terry, George. 1986. Asas-Asas Manajemen. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni
  21. Undang-Undang RI No. 20 Tahun 2003. Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta : Cemerlang