Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 24, 2019
Accepted
January 7, 2021
Published
December 1, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 430 Download : 357

Main Article Content

Abstract

Latar Belakang: Manajemen nyeri sangat penting dalam melakukan tindakan sirkumsisi maupun setelah tindakan sirkumsisi. Salah satu metode untuk mengurangi nyeri adalah dengan pemberian krim lidokain-prilokain. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui perbandingan nilai Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pasien dengan pemberian krim lidokain-prilokain dan pasien yang tidak diberikan krim lidokain-prilokain pasca sirkumsisi. Metode: Penelitian quasi eksperimental dengan 12 subjek penelitian yang menjalani sirkumsisi dengan rentang usia 5-12 tahun. Subjek penelitian dibagi menjadi 2 kelompok, yaitu kelompok perlakuan (diberikan krim lidokain-prilokain) dan kelompok kontrol (tidak diberikan krim lidokain-prilokain). Pasien kelompok perlakuan akan diberikan krim lidokain-prilokain oleh dokter diruang operasi pada daerah sekitar luka bekas insisi, sedangkan pasien kelompok kontrol tidak diberikan krim lidokain-prilokain. Pengukuran nilai VAS dilakukan pada menit ke-45 dan menit 90 setelah penambahan krim lidokain-prilokain. Hasil: Hasil uji t menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan (p =0,004) terhadap nilai VAS pasien yang diberikan krim lidokain-prilokain pada menit 45 dan 90 dibandingkan dengan yang tidak diberikan krim lidokain-prilokain disekitar luka setelah operasi.Kesimpulan: Penelitian ini menununjukkan bahwa pasien yang diberikan krim lidokain-prilokain dapat menurunkan nilai VAS dibandingkan dengan nilai VAS pasien yang tidak diberikan krim lidokain-prilokain pada pasien paska sirkumsisi.

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Nasution, A. A. (2020). PERBANDINGAN NYERI PASCA SIRKUMSISI DENGAN ATAU TANPA PEMBERIAN LIDOKAIN-PRILOKAIN KRIM DINILAI DENGAN VISUAL ANALOG SCALE (VAS) DI RUMAH SAKIT BHAYANGKARA KOTA BENGKULU. Jurnal Kedokteran Raflesia, 6(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33369/juke.v6i2.9881
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Weiss H, Polonsky J. Male circumcision Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of. World Health Organ. 2007
  2. Morris BJ, Kennedy SE, Wodak AD, Mindel A, Golovsky D, Schrieber L, et al. Early infant male circumcision: Systematic review, risk-benefit analysis, and progress in policy. World J Clin Pediatr. 2017;6(1):89.
  3. Weiss HA, Dickson KE, Agot K, Hankins CA. Male circumcision for HIV prevention : Current research and programmatic issues. Aids. 2014;24(0 4):1–17.
  4. Moses S, Bailey RC, Ronald AR. Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks. Sex Transm Infect. 1998;74(5):368–73.
  5. American Academy of Pediatrics. Male Circumcision. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):e756–85.
  6. Morris BJ. Commentary: Do the Benefits of Male Circumcision Outweigh the Risks? A Critique of the Proposed CDC Guidelines. Front Pediatr. 2015;3(March):1–6.
  7. World Health Organization. Neonatal and child male circumcision: a global review. Unaids. 2010;1–108.
  8. Iqbal M, Ramadhino B, Rambe Y, Situngkir B. Male neonatal circumcision: Indications, controversies and complications. Urol Clin North Am. 2004;31(3):461–7.
  9. Gorgulu T, Olgun A, Torun M, Kargi E. A fast, easy circumcision procedure combining a CO2 laser and cyanoacrylate adhesive: A non-randomized comparative trial. Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42(1):113–7.
  10. Hancerliogullari G, Hancerliogullari KO, Koksalmis E. The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):1–13.
  11. Gyftopoulos KI. The efficacy and safety of topical EMLA cream application for minor surgery of the adult penis. Urol Ann. 2012;4(3):145–9.
  12. Cassuto J, Sinclair R, Bonderovic M. Anti-inflammatory properties of local anesthetics and their present and potential clinical implications. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Mar;50(3):265–82.
  13. Neumann MA, Weiskopf RB, Gong DH, Eger EI 2nd, Ionescu P. Changing from isoflurane to desflurane toward the end of anesthesia does not accelerate recovery in humans. Anesthesiology. 1998 Apr;88(4):914–21.
  14. Eichenfield LF, Funk A, Fallon-Friedlander S, Cunningham BB. A clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of ELA-Max (4% liposomal lidocaine) as compared with eutectic mixture of local anesthetics cream for pain reduction of venipuncture in children. Pediatrics. 2002 Jun;109(6):1093–9.
  15. Kumar M, Chawla R, Goyal M. Topical anesthesia. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31(4):450–6.
  16. Noh DH, Cho MC, Park HK, Lee HW, Lee KS. The effects of combination perianal-intrarectal lidocaine-prilocaine cream and periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: A randomized, controlled trial. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(7):463–6.
  17. Baral BK, Bhattarai BK, Rahman TR, Singh SN, Regmi R. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery. Nepal Med Coll J. 2010 Dec;12(4):215–20.
  18. Lillieborg S, Aanderud L. Original Article EMLA anaesthetic cream for debridement of burns : a study of plasma concentrations of lidocaine and prilocaine and a review of the literature. 2017;7(6):88–97.
  19. Lanitis S, Mimigianni C, Raptis D, Sourtse G, Sgourakis G, Karaliotas C. The Impact of Educational Status on the Postoperative Perception of Pain. 2015;28(4):265–74.
  20. Blanco-hungría A, Rodríguez-torronteras A, Blanco-aguilera A, Biedma- L. Influence of sociodemographic factors upon pain intensity in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders seen in the primary care setting. 2012;17(6):1034–41.
  21. Rantala M, Kankkunen P, Kvist T, Hartikainen S. Post-Operative Pain Management Practices in Patients with Dementia - The Current Situation in Finland. 2012;71–81.
  22. Juzwiszyn J, Milan M. Adaptation to illness in relation to pain perceived by patients after surgery. 2017;1447–52