Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 21, 2019
Published
December 24, 2023
Download
Reza Meta Nela (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 85 Download : 91

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in learning result in thematic lessons using models of Discovery Learning and Problem Based Learning (PBL) fifth grade students of Elementary School Cluster V of Bengkulu City. The research method used was Quasi Experimental with a type of PretestPosttest Comparison Group research design. The study population was all fifth grade students of Elementary School Group V of Bengkulu City. The research sample was fifth grade B at SDN 02 for experimental class 1 and fifth grade A student at SDN 09 for experimental class 2. The sampling technique used purposive sampling. The research instrument using tests of cognitive learning result multiple choice questions was given through pretest and posttest. Learning result for attitudes and skills using observation sheet instruments and using simple descriptive analysis to calculate the percentage of each descriptor. Based on the results of data analysis obtained (1) the highest attitude aspect is the aspect that uses the Discovery Learning model, namely the attitude of curiosity while the highest attitude for the Problem Based Learning model is also an attitude of curiosity (2) the highest learning result of the skill aspects for the Discovery Learning model are the skills of item B while the highest attitude for the Problem Based Learning model is the skill item C. (3) H0 is accepted so that there is no significant difference between students using discovery learning models and problem based learning models.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Nela, R. M., & Dalifa. (2023). Studi Komparasi Hasil Belajar Pada Pembelajaran Tematik Model Discovery Learning dan Problem Based Learning Siswa SD. JURIDIKDAS (Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar), 6(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.33369/juridikdas.v6i3.8176
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abidin, 2014.Desain Sistem Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Kurikulum 2313.Bandung : PT Refika Aditama
  2. E. Kokasih.2014. Strategi Belajar Dan Pembelajaran Implementasi Kurikulum 2013.Bandung: Yarama Widya
  3. Fatimah, dkk .2018. Perbedaan Hasil Belajar IPA Menggunakan Model Discovey Learning dan Problem Basrs Learning Pada Siswa Kelas 3 SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Vol 2, No 2, 2018.
  4. Hosnan.2014. Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21.Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia
  5. Kadir, Abd & Ashora. 2014. Pembelajaran Tematik.Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  6. Nanang H & Suhana. 2009. Konsep Strategi Pmbelajaran. Bandung: PT Rafika Aditama.
  7. OECD., (2015), “ PISSA 2015 Assesment and Analitycal Framwork: Matematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy”. Paris Journla of OECD Publising, Hal:1-8.
  8. Pangastuti, dkk. 2019. Efektivitas Discovery Learning dan Problem Based Learnng Pada Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas Iv Ditinjau Dari Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Di Sdn Karangduren 01. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Vol 3, No 1, 2019
  9. Putra, Sitiatava Rizema. 2013. Desain Belajar Mengajar Kreatif Berbasis Sains. Yogyakarta : Diva Press
  10. Rusman 2017.Belajar dan Pembelajarann Berorientasi stadar proses pendiidkan. Jakarta: Kencana
  11. Rusman. 2016. Model-model Pembelajan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  12. Shoimin, A. 2014. 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: AR-Ruzz Media.
  13. Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
  14. Suprijono, A. 2009. Cooperative Learning. Surabaya: Pustaka Belajar.
  15. Suyono.2015. Implemenasi Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
  16. Winarni, E.W. 2012. Inovasi Dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Bengkulu : FKIP Unib