Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 1, 2022
Accepted
January 26, 2023
Published
January 26, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 170 Download : 135

Main Article Content

Abstract

The abstract in every research paper has always served as an attention-grabber, either encouraging readers to continue reading the research or discouraging them from doing so. This research is aimed to find the most dominant move and step of thesis abstract by undergraduate students and to identify any differences. This research used a mix method approach. The design of this research is descriptive, using quantitative as well as qualitative data. The data was taken from thirty undergraduate thesis abstracts of Education faculty from University of Bengkulu who graduated between 2019 to 2022. Hyland’s five-move model will be used for research instrument. The result showed that, the majority and most dominant moves that found were Move 2 (purpose) 100%, followed by Move 3 (Method) 97%, Move 4 (Product) 97% and Move 5 (Conclusion) 80%, while the most dominant Step that found was Step 1 of Move 2 (Stating the purpose directly) 100%. Also, there is no significant differences of Move from the three study programs (English, Physic and Guidance and Counselling). Conclusion, most of the students were simply following the “Thesis Writing Guidelines” in writing their abstracts. Therefore, it would be better for the department in charge to revise the guidelines and use this research as a reference or guidance for a better abstract writing.

Keywords

Abstract Rhetorical Style Move analysis Different study programs.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Bayu Wijaya, Safnil Arsyad, Mei Hardiah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Amir Zand-Moghadam, Hussein Meihami (2016). A Rhetorical Move Analysis of TEFL Thesis Abstracts: The Case of Allameh Tabataba’i University. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), Vol. 5, No. 1, 1-23. DOI:10.22054/ilt.2016.7714
  2. Amnuai, Wirada (2019). Analyses of Rhetorical Moves and Linguistic Realizations in Accounting Research Article Abstracts Published in International and Thai-Based Journals. SAGE open, v9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822384
  3. Arsyad, S. (2013). A Genre-Based Analysis On The Introductions Of Research Articles Written By Indonesian Academics. TEFLIN Journal, Volume 24, Number 2, July 2013.
  4. Arsyad, S. (2013). A genre-based analysis of Indonesian research articles in the social sciences and humanities written by Indonesian speakers. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 8(3). DOI:10.1080/17447143.2013.849711
  5. Arsyad, S. (2013). A Genre-Based Analysis on Discussion Section of Research Articles in Indonesian Written by Indonesian Speakers. International Journal of Linguistic. DOI:10.5296/ijl.v5i4.3773
  6. Ebadi, S., Salman, Ahmet, R., Nguyen, T; Weisi, H. (2019). Rhetorical Structure Variations in Abstracts and Introductions of Applied Linguistics Master's Theses by Iraqi and International Students. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, v7 n1 p101-117
  7. Ejontomi, A. (2018). A Discourse Analysis of Rhetorical Style in Research Article Introduction in Law Studies Written by International Authors. Journal of English Education and Teaching. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.2.4.84-102
  8. Hartley, J. (2010). Writing a Structured Abstract for the Thesis. Psychology Teaching Review, v16 n1 p98-100
  9. Kamaruddin, at all. (2013). Rhetorical Structure in Academic Research Writing by Non-Native Writers. Universiti Malaysia Perlis.
  10. Muangsamai, P. (2018). Analysis of Moves, rhetorical patterns and linguistics features in new scientist articles. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 39 No. 2 (2018): May- August.
  11. Zong, J. (2017). Rhetorical Interpretation of Abstracts in Sci-Tech Theses Based on Burke's Identification Theory. English Language Teaching, v10 n5 p68-75. DOI:10.5539/elt.v10n5p68