Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 15, 2020
Accepted
September 28, 2020
Published
September 28, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 134 Download : 138

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to see how much difference the impact of the two teaching styles, flexibility on learning kayang. The sample was students of SMP 6 Pontianak City, totaling 48 students, which were divided into 4 groups, with details consisting of 12 students per group. Quantitative method which has the form of Experiment with FACTORIAL design by level 2 x 2 is a research method. Two-way analysis of variance is a way of analyzing in this study, followed by a normality test and a homegeneity test. After that, the Tukey test was continued with a significance level of ? = 0.05. This research has succeeded in answering several hypotheses that have been proposed. The first is the Inclusive Teaching Style (GMI) has a significant effect compared to the Exercise Teaching Style (GML) on kayang learning outcomes. The second is that GMI and GML have a strong interaction with the rich learning outcomes. The third is that GMI is more appropriate to be applied than GML for students who have high flexibility in the learning outcomes of kayang. The fourth is that GML is more appropriately applied compared to GMI in students who have low flexibility in the learning outcomes of kayang.

Article Details

License
 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Hidasari, F. P., & Bafadal, M. F. (2020). The Influence Of Teaching Style And Flexibility On Kayang Learning Outcomes. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 4(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v4i2.12509
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Aji, B. P. (2017). Penerapan GMI untuk Meningkatan Hasil Belajar Guling Lenting pada Siswa Kelas IX G SMP Negeri 8 Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2017 / 2018.
  2. Bangun, S. Y., & Fitriyani, S. (2018). PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR GULING BELAKANG SENAM LANTAI MELALUI GML PADA PELAJAR SMA. Journal Physical Education, Health and Recreation, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24114/PJKR.V3I1.11510
  3. Daryusman, C., Hermawan, R., & Adam, U. (2014). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERPASANGAN DAN BERKELOMPOK TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN GERAK DASAR KAYANG. JUPE (Jurnal Penjaskesrek), 2(2).
  4. Fis Andriyani. (2012). Dr. Olahraga Menjelaskan Senam Lantai - Fis Andriyani - Google Buku. In Balai Pustaka.
  5. Heri Rahyubi. (2012). Teori-teori belajar dan aplikasi pembelajaran motorik. Nusa Media.
  6. Hidasari, F. P., Natalia, L., & Pramana, Y. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Ajar Mata Kuliah Pertumbuhan Dan Perkembangan Motorik Berbasis Pembelajaran Inklusi. Jorpres (Jurnal Olahraga Prestasi), 14(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.21831/jorpres.v14i1.19979
  7. Hidayat, C. (2008). MODEL INKLUSI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN JASMANI (Studi Eksperimen di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 8 Tasikmalaya). EDUCARE, 6(1).
  8. I Wayan Eka Putra. (2013). ANALISIS TINGKAT KECEMASAN SISWA KELAS VIII DALAM PEMBELAJARAN SENAM LANTAI GULING LENTING | . | Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga dan Kesehatan Undiksha. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga Dan Kesehatan
  9. Jamilah, G., & Nugraheni, W. (2017). Hubungan antara Fleksibilitas Otot Perut dengan Keterampilan Gerak Dasar Kayang dalam Senam Artistik. Media Ilmu Keolahragaan Indonesia, 7(2), 56-59.
  10. Muhammad Mury Syafei. (2016). PENGARUH GAYA MENGAJAR DAN FLEXIBILITY TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR GERAKAN TIGER SPRONG SENAM LANTAI | Syafei | JUDIKA (JURNAL PENDIDIKAN UNSIKA). Jurnal Pendidikan UNSIKA, 4(1).
  11. Priyambada, G., KS, S., & Handayani, O. W. K. (2016). PENGARUH GAYA MENGAJAR RESIPROKAL DAN MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI TERHADAP HASIL PEMBELAJARAN SENAM LANTAI. Journal of Physical Education and Sports, 5(1), 1–7.
  12. Sanchez, B., Byra, M., & Wallhead, T. L. (2012). Students’ perceptions of the command, practice, and inclusion styles of teaching. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(3), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.690864
  13. Suryani, Y., Rukmana, A., & Sudirjo, E. (2018). MENINGKATKAN PEMBELAJARAN SENAM KAYANG MENGGUNAKAN METODE PROGRESIF. In SpoRTIVE (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
  14. Terry, J. J. (2016). KELENTUKAN, UMPAN BALIK, DAN METODE KOMBINASI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN SENAM LANTAI. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 16(3).
  15. Wandi Suhendra, B. A. H. (2019). UPAYA MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SIKAP KAYANG MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA BOLA FISIO DAN DINDING PADA SISWA KELAS V SDN JOHAR BARU 29 JAKARTA PUSAT | Jurnal Olahraga Rekreasi. Jurnal Olahraga Rekreasi, 1(1), 02.