Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 2, 2021
Accepted
September 22, 2021
Published
September 30, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 271 Download : 214

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article aims to describe a needs analysis related to the development of a digital-based physical fitness test application. This physical fitness test application will later help physical education teachers to be able to evaluate the physical fitness of students. The target respondents in this study were students and physical education teachers in South Sumatra. The results showed that, from 115 respondents who filled out questionnaires distributed online via google form, it showed that 105 (91.30%) respondents had done physical fitness tests to students, 3 (2.61%) respondents had never, and 7 (6.09%) respondents answered maybe. And 103 (89.57%) respondents want the development of test and measurement applications related to physical fitness, 2 (1.74%) respondents think “no”, and 10 (8.70%) respondents think "maybe". The conclusion of this study is the need for a digital-based physical fitness test and measurement application, either in the form of a website or mobile application.

Keywords

Needs Analysis Development Research Physical Fitness Physical Education Test Measurement

Article Details

License
 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Bayu, W. I., Yusfi, H., Syafaruddin, S., Al Ikhsan, A. I., Lusiana, L., & Waldo, K. (2021). Needs Analysis of Development Digital-Based Physical Fitness Test Application. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 5(3), 597–603. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v5i3.17763
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Baek, J.-H., Keath, A., & Elliott, E. (2018). Physical Education Teachers’ Technology Practices and Challenges. International Journal of Human Movement Science, 12(2), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.23949/ijhms.2018.08.12.2.2
  2. Craig, C. L., Tudor-Locke, C., Cragg, S., & Cameron, C. (2010). Process and treatment of pedometer data collection for youth: The canadian physical activity levels among youth study. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 42(3), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b67544
  3. Enright, E., & Gard, M. (2016). Media, digital technology and learning in sport: a critical response to Hodkinson, Biesta and James. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1043258
  4. Hoyos Cillero, I., & Jago, R. (2010). Systematic review of correlates of screen-viewing among young children. Preventive Medicine, 51(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.04.012
  5. Juniu, S. (2011). Pedagogical Uses of Technology in Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 82(9), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2011.10598692
  6. Lloyd, M., Colley, R. C., & Tremblay, M. S. (2010). Advancing the debate on “fitness testing” for children: Perhaps we’re riding the wrong animal. Pediatric Exercise Science, 22(2), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.22.2.176
  7. McVicker, D. (2018). How technology changes Physical Education classes. G2 Learn Hub. https://learn.g2.com/technology-in-physical-education
  8. Mohnsen, B. (2012). Implementing Online Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 83(2), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2012.10598727
  9. Morgan, C. F., Beighle, A., Pangrazi, R. P., & Pangrazi, D. (2004). Children ’ s Fitness Using Self-Assessment for Personal Fitness Evaluation. Teaching Elementary Physical Education, 15(1), 19–22.
  10. Pangrazi, R. P., & Beighle, A. (2016). Dynamic Physical Education for Elementary School Children (18th editi). Pearson Education, Inc.
  11. Pangrazi, R. P., Beighle, A., Shawley, J. M., Corte, M., & Nichols, C. (2020). Physical Activity and Learning: The Ingredients of a Quality Lesson. In 2020 SHAPE America National Convention & Expo. SHAPEAMERICA.
  12. Pereira, J., Hastie, P., Araújo, R., Farias, C., Rolim, R., & Mesquita, I. (2014). A comparative study of students’ track and field technical performance in sport education and in a direct instruction approach. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 14(1), 118–127.
  13. Wyant, J., & Baek, J. H. (2019). Re-thinking technology adoption in physical education. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 10(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2018.1514983
  14. Yildiz, Ö. (2013). Physical education teachers’ performance evaluation. Life Science Journal, 10(1), 796–803. https://doi.org/10.7537/marslsj100113.125