Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 17, 2022
Accepted
June 30, 2022
Published
June 30, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1364 Download : 878

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the e-learning system in practical courses in the Physical Education Department based on psychomotor learning outcomes. The research method used is descriptive qualitative, using a survey design with a cross-sectional type for program evaluation. In this case, the program analyzed for evaluation is online-based learning in practical courses based on psychomotor learning outcomes during the Covid 19 pandemic. Questionnaires, interviews, observations, and documentation were used for the data collection. The results explain students' perceptions of the use of online learning media. The interviews results emphasize the following indicators; 1) readiness, 2) facilities and infrastructure, 3) strategies and models, 4) syntax, 5) response, 6) assessment form, 7) success rate, 8) difficulty, 9) overcoming obstacles, 10) weaknesses and strengths, 11 ) Effectiveness. The research proves that online-based practical learning can be implemented. It is proven by students' and lecturers' perceptions regarding the plan, implementation, and evaluation of psychomotor learning. It has been explained comprehensively, especially for the use of media and evaluation of learning used, which is highly highlighted by students and lecturers. Although there are limitations regarding other supporting facilities and infrastructure, it will be a note for further research using different research methods.

Keywords

Online learning Psychomotor Learning Outcomes Practical courses

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Cucu Hidayat, Aang Rohyana, Anggi Setia Lengkana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Hidayat, C., Rohyana, A., & Lengkana, A. S. (2022). Students’ Perceptions Toward Practical Online Learning in Physical Education: A Case Study. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 6(2), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v6i2.21658
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Andrew, L., Wallace, R., & Sambell, R. (2021). A peer-observation initiative to enhance student engagement in the synchronous virtual classroom: A case study of a COVID-19 mandated move to online learning. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(4), 14.
  2. Bains, S., Sundby, J., Lindskog, B. V, Vangen, S., Diep, L. M., Owe, K. M., & Sorbye, I. K. (2021). Satisfaction with maternity care among recent migrants: an interview questionnaire-based study. BMJ Open, 11(7), e048077.
  3. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., … Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661.
  4. Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184
  5. Cone, S., & Cone, T. P. (2011). Assessing dance in physical education. Strategies, 24(6), 28–32.
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
  7. Filiz, B., & Konukman, F. (2020). Teaching Strategies for Physical Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 91(9), 48–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2020.1816099
  8. Hidayah, R., Wangid, M. N., & Wuryandani, W. (2022). Elementary school teacher perception of curriculum changes in Indonesia. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(2), 77–88.
  9. Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.
  10. Hruschka, D. J., Schwartz, D., St. John, D. C., Picone-Decaro, E., Jenkins, R. A., & Carey, J. W. (2004). Reliability in coding open-ended data: Lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods, 16(3), 307–331.
  11. Husamuddin, A. F., Sakti, A. W., & Wulandary, V. (2022). The Effectiveness of Sports and Health Learning through the Zoom Meeting media for Junior High School Students during the Covid 19 pandemic. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 2(1), 17–26.
  12. Jenny, S. E., Hushman, G. F., & Hushman, C. J. (2013). Pre-Service Teachers' Perceptions of Motion-Based Video Gaming in Physical Education.
  14. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 96–111.
  15. Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396.
  16. Juliya, M., & Herlambang, Y. T. (2021). Analisis problematika pembelajaran daring dan pengaruhnya terhadap motivasi belajar siswa. Genta Mulia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 12(1).
  17. Laughlin, M. K., Hodges, M., & Iraggi, T. (2019). Deploying video analysis to boost instruction and assessment in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 90(5), 23–29.
  18. Lee, J., & Spratling, R. (2019). Recruiting mothers of children with developmental disabilities: adaptations of the snowball sampling technique using social media. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 33(1), 107–110.
  19. Lengkana, A. S., Rahman, A. A., Alif, M. N., Mulya, G., Priana, A., & Hermawan, D. B. (2020). Static and Dynamic Balance Learning in Primary School Students. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 8(6), 469–476. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2020.080620
  20. Little, S., & Hall, T. (2017). Selecting, teaching and assessing physical education dance experiences. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 88(3), 36–42.
  21. Lukman Nul Hakim. (2013). Ulasan Metodologi Kualitatif: Wawancara Terhadap Elit. Aspirasi, 4(2), 165–172.
  22. Mariati, P., Djazilan, S., Nafiah, N., & Hartatik, S. (2022). Before the pandemic and its impact to the future" about IoT and the transformation of children's social education. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(2), 95–102.
  23. Muhtar, T., Supriyadi, T., & Lengkana, A. S. (2020). Character Development-based Physical Education Learning Model in Primary School. 8(6), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2020.080605
  24. Mulya, G., Lengkana, A. S., & Agustryani, R. (2021). TennBasTech: A Scientific Approach to Teach Tennis.
  25. Muslimin, A. I., & Harintama, F. (2020). Online learning during pandemic: Students' motivation, challenges, and alternatives. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 13(2), 60–68.
  26. Pratama, R. E., & Mulyati, S. (2020). Pembelajaran Daring dan Luring pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(2), 49–59.
  27. Quennerstedt, M. (2013). PE on YouTube - investigating participation in physical education practice. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 18(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2011.631000
  28. Rahman, A. A., Angraeni, A., & Fauzi, R. A. (2021). The activation of learners' metacognition to promote learning autonomy of good language learners. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(4), 249-253.
  30. Rahman, A. A., Suherman, A., Susilawati, D., & Putra, G. P. (2020). RADEC (Reading, Answering, Demonstrating, Explaining, and Creating) in LMS to teach tennis without field practicing. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(11), 5433-5442.
  31. Sadikin, A. (2020). Pembelajaran daring di tengah wabah covid-19.
  32. Thomas, G. (2021). How to do your case study. Sage.
  33. Tolgfors, B. (2018). Different versions of assessment for learning in the subject of physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3), 311–327.
  34. Yu, C.-H., Wu, C.-C., Wang, J.-S., Chen, H.-Y., & Lin, Y.-T. (2020). Learning tennis through video-based reflective learning by using motion-tracking sensors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 64–77.
  35. Yu, J., & Jee, Y. (2021). Analysis of online classes in physical education during the covid-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI11010003
  36. Zarzycka, E., Krasodomska, J., Mazurczak-M?ka, A., & Turek-Radwan, M. (2021). Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: students' communication and collaboration and the role of social media. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1953228. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1953228