Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 21, 2022
Accepted
May 3, 2023
Published
March 31, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 109 Download : 99

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Improving scientific argumentation skills through the application of the ADI learning model is the main goal of this research. Classroom action research through cycle 1 and cycle 2 was applied to achieve the research objectives. The procedure in this study consisted of five stages, namely: planning, implementing actions, observing, and reflecting. A total of 50 students were involved as subjects in this classroom action research. The subjects are physical education students in the fifth semester who are taking research methodology lectures. Data collection was carried out in 2 cycles, the first cycle was carried out in August- October 2022. Data collection techniques and instruments in this classroom action research were used techniques such as observation, argumentation ability test, and interviews. From the results of the analysis of observational data, it is known that in cycle 1 there is an average value of 70.67% and in cycle 2 it increases to 84%. Scientific argumentation skills in cycle 1 are 68.4% and in cycle 2 are 82%. In cycle 1, it is known that student learning completeness is 72%, while in cycle 2, student learning completeness is 82%. So it can be concluded that applying the ADI learning model can improve the scientific argumentation skills of physical education students. 

Keywords

ADI Physical education Scientific argumentation

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Dian Pujianto, Yahya Eko Nopiyanto, Syafrial, Bayu Insanistyo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Dian Pujianto, Yahya Eko Nopiyanto, Syafrial, & Bayu Insanistyo. (2023). Improving the Scientific Argumentation Skills of Physical Education Students Through the Argument Driven Inquiry Learning Model. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 7(1), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v7i1.24291
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Alawiyah, S. (2020). Pembelajaran Online dan Hasil Menulis Karangan Argumentasi di Era Big Data. Justek: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, 3(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.31764/justek.v3i1.3697
  2. Amielia, S. D., Suciati, S., & Maridi, M. (2018). Enhancing Students’ Argumentation Skill Using an Argument Driven Inquiry-Based Module. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(3), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v12i3.8042
  3. Amin, & Corebima. (2016). Analisis Persepsi Dosen terhadap Strategi Pembelajaran Reading Questioning and Answering (RQA) dan Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) pada Program Studi The effect of PDEODE (Predict-Discuss-Explain-Observe-Discuss-Explain) Learning Strategy In The Different Aca. Researchgate.Net, March.
  4. Bestiantono, D. S. (2020). Students' Responses Toward Scientific Argumentation with ADI Learning Model to Physics Literacy: a Case of Indonesian Senior High School Students. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.46627/silet.v1i1.18
  5. Çetin, P. S., & Eymur, G. (2017). Developing students’ scientific writing and presentation skills through argument driven inquiry: an exploratory study. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(7), 837-843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00915
  6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Action research. In Research methods in education (pp. 440-456). Routledge.
  7. Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the effect of argument-driven inquiry in laboratory instruction. Educational Sciences, 15(1), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2324
  8. Effendi, E. (2017). Pemberian Reward Pengaruhnya terhadap Aktivitas Belajar Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Fisika Dasar. JIPFRI (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Dan Riset Ilmiah), 1(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.30599/jipfri.v1i1.35
  9. Eskin, H., & Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. (2013). Argumentation as a strategy for conceptual learning of dynamics. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1939-1956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9339-5
  10. Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim, M. (2015). Penerapan model argument-driven inquiry dalam pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 20(1), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.36195.g15573
  11. Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. In The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
  12. Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as an argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395
  13. Marhamah, O. S., Nurlaelah, I., & Setiawati, I. (2017). Penerapan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry (Adi) Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Pada Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan Di Kelas X Sma Negeri 1 Ciawigebang. Quagga : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 9(02), 45. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v9i02.747
  14. Minarti, E. D., & Nurfauziah, P. (2016). Pendekatan Konstruktivisme dengan Model Pembelajaran Generatif Guna Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Koneksi Matematis serta Self Efficacy Mahasiswa Calon Guru di Kota Cimahi. Jurnal Ilmiah P2M STKIP Siliwangi, 3(2), 68-83. https://doi.org/10.22460/p2m.v3i2p68-83.629
  15. Nasution, E. S. (2019). Peningkatan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Ilmiah Pada Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Argument- Driven Inquiry (ADI). Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (Jep), 3(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol3-iss2/375
  16. Probosari, R. M., Ramli, M., Harlita, H., Indrowati, M., & Sajidan, S. (2016). Profil keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan biologi fkip uns pada mata kuliah anatomi tumbuhan. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 9(1), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i1.3880
  17. Putri, P. A. W., Rahayu, S., & Fajaroh, F. (2020). Efektivitas Argument-Driven Inquiry untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Ilmiah pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 5(1), 57-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v5i1.13132
  18. Samsinar, S. (2020). Urgensi learning resources (sumber belajar) dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(2), 194-205. 10.30863/didaktika.v13i2.959
  19. Tamelab, P., Ngongo, M. H. L., & Oetpah, D. (2021). Meningkatkan Kepercayaan Diri Mahasiswa Dalam Kemampuan Public Speaking Di Sekolah Tinggi Pastoral Keuskupan Agung Kupang. Selidik (Jurnal Seputar Penelitian Pendidikan Keagamaan), 2(1), 54-63. Retrieved from http://www.ejurnal.org/index.php/selidik/article/view/38
  20. Tuysuz, C., Demirel, O. E., & Yildirim, B. (2013). Investigating the Effects of Argumentation, Problem and Laboratory Based Instruction Approaches on pre-service Teachers’ Achievement Concerning the Concept of “acid and Base.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1376–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.047