Article Sidebar

Submitted
November 27, 2022
Accepted
December 22, 2022
Published
December 29, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 162 Download : 132

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of limited face-to-face lectures for Table Tennis and Aquatics I. The study was conducted on students of the Physical Education Study Program FKIP in semester 4 of the even academic year 2021-2022 as the sample used for the Table Tennis course and semester 2 of the even academic year. 2021-2022 which is used as a sample for the Aquatic I course. The research carried out includes a qualitative descriptive type which evaluates the implementation of limited face-to-face lectures for the Table Tennis course with Aquatic I through interviews and filling out questionnaires via Google Form. The results obtained from interviews for Table Tennis courses based on 1) indicators of the evaluation of the learning process concluded that most of the learning process could run well even though it was limited by health protocols 2) indicators of evaluation of the implementation process, it could be concluded that the process of implementing face-to-face lectures was limited to courses Table Tennis is quite good and 3) Based on the indicators of learning outcomes, it can be concluded that the learning outcomes can be achieved, although it must be improved in several supporting factors such as the internet network and the availability of table tennis which needs to be increased. While the results obtained from interviews for Aquatic I Course are based on 1) indicators of evaluation of the learning process, it can be concluded that most of the learning process can run well even though it is limited by health protocols 2) indicators of evaluation of the implementation process, it can be concluded that the process of implementing face-to-face lectures is limited by eyes. Aquatic I lecture is quite good and 3) Based on the indicators of learning outcomes, it can be concluded that learning outcomes can be achieved, although it must be improved in several supporting factors such as the internet network. The results obtained by filling out questionnaires for the Table Tennis Course show that the Table Tennis lectures were carried out well even though they were held face-to-face. The same results were obtained through filling out questionnaires for the Aquatic I Course, indicating that the Aquatic I lecture was carried out well even though it was held face-to-face in a limited manner. In conclusion, during limited face-to-face lectures, both Table Tennis and Aquatic I courses can be carried out well.

Keywords

Learning Evaluation Limited Face-to-face Lectures Table Tennis Aquatic I

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Andriani Barek Ladjar , Veramyta M.M. Flora Babang, Ronald Dwi Ardian Fufu, Jurdan Martin Siahaan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author Biography

Maria Andriani Barek Ladjar , Universitas Nusa Cendana

Dosen PJKR Universitas Nusa Cendana

Kota Kupang Nusa Tenggara Timur

How to Cite
Ladjar, M. A. B., Veramyta M.M. Flora Babang, Fufu, R. D. A., & Jurdan Martin Siahaan. (2022). Evaluation of Implementation of Face-to-Face Lectures Limited to Table Tennis and Aquatic I Courses. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 6(4), 660–673. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v6i4.25013
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Aqmarani, A., Magdalen, I., & Ayudhiya, N. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pada Tingkat Sekolah Dasar Andini. Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 1(2), 57–63. Retrieved From Http://Cerdika.Publikasiindonesia.Id/Index.Php/Cerdika/Index
  2. Dermawan, I. B., & Harmianto, S. (2021). Penerapan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Dalam Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 196–205. Https://Doi.Org/10.51574/Jrip.V1i2.81
  3. Fitrah, M., & Ruslan, R. (2020). Eksplorasi Sistem Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Bima. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(1), 178–187. Https://Doi.Org/10.31004/Basicedu.V5i1.639
  4. Jemadis, A. J., Hendrikus Midun, Arsenia Mensiana, Ardiana Aci Sarni, & Arnoldus Beatominu Karim. (2022). Analisis Kesiapan Pelaksanaan Dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Masa Pandemi Covid 19 Jenjang Sekolah Dasar Di Kota Ruteng. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Missio, 14(1), 37–51. Https://Doi.Org/10.36928/Jpkm.V14i1.922
  5. La Ode Onde, M. K., Aswat, H., Sari, E. R., & Meliza, N. (2021). Analisis Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Terbatas (Tmt) Di Masa New Normal Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(6), 4400–4406. Https://Doi.Org/10.31004/Edukatif.V3i6.1449
  6. Magdalena, I., Septiana, R., Ilmah, Siti Nurul, & Faridah, Dwi Nur. (2020). Analisis Kompetensi Guru Dalam Proses Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Di Sdn Peninggilan 05. Nusantara : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2, 262–275.
  7. Muhammad, M., Widyaningrum, H. K., Masjid, A. A., Komariah, K., & Sumarwati, S. (2021). Pelaksanaan Prosedur Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di Smk Pekanbaru Pada Masa Pandemi. Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra,14(2),109. Https://Doi.Org/10.30651/St.V14i2.8262
  8. Mustika, T. P., Fajriani, S. W., Prasetio, M. B., & Pernantah, P. S. (2022). Implementasi Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Terbatas Pada Masa New Normal Di Mtsn 3 Rokan Hulu. Jiip - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(3), 901–906. Https://Doi.Org/10.54371/Jiip.V5i3.509
  9. Prilanji, F. B., & Gaperius Simanjuntak, V. (2020). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani. Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Khatulistiwa, 1(1),12.Https://Doi.Org/10.26418/Jpjk.V1i1.44505
  10. Sapulette, M. S. (2021). Eksplorasi Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Daring Mahasiswa Ppkn Pada Era New Normal. Syntax Idea, 3(3), 567. Https://Doi.Org/10.36418/Syntax-Idea.V3i3.1089
  11. Sodikin, S., & Gumiandari, S. (2022). Analisis Swot Mutu Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jdmp (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen Pendidikan), 6(1).Https://Doi.Org/10.26740/Jdmp.V6n1.P59-69
  12. Suryani, L., Tute, K. J., Nduru, M. P., & Pendy, A. (2022). Analisis Implementasi Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Terbatas Di Masa New Normal. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(3), 2234–2244. Https://Doi.Org/10.31004/Obsesi.V6i3.1915
  13. Suwardi, S. (2021). Problematika Evaluasi Pembelajaran Dalam Mencapai Tujuan Pendidikan Di Masa Pandemi Covid 19. Manajerial : Jurnal Inovasi Manajemen Dan Supervisi Pendidikan,1(1),33–40. Https://Doi.Org/10.51878/Manajerial.V1i1.230
  14. Tarigan, A. L. (2021). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Online Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Kecamatan Minas. Strategi Pembelajaran Di Masa Pandemi. Retrieved From Https://Jurnal.Uhnp.Ac.Id/Psn-Uhnp/Article/View/129
  15. Winarti Dwi Febriani, Geri Syahril Sidik, & Riza Fatimah Zahrah. (2020). Analisis Pengelolaan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013 Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Tunas Bangsa, 7(1), 60–72. Https://Doi.Org/10.46244/Tunasbangsa.V7i1.976