Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 27, 2022
Accepted
February 2, 2023
Published
December 31, 2022
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 85 Download : 69

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The problem in this study is the factors that influence tennis coaching including organizational management factors, athlete training, competition programs and training programs for related parties involved in solving the problem. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of the Bengkulu Tennis School Athlete Achievement Development Program using the CIPP evaluation model (Context, Input, Process, Product). The evaluation model used in this study is the CIPP model. The research subjects consisted of administrators, coaches, and athletes. Data collection techniques using the method of observation, interviews, documentation, and questionnaires. The data analysis technique in this research is descriptive quantitative and qualitative analysis. The results of this study are (1) Context Evaluation, getting a good rating, (2) Input Evaluation, get a good rating, (3) Process Evaluation gets a good rating, (4) Product Evaluation gets a good rating. In this case it is classified as a good criterion in the standard of success of a development. The conclusion from the research results of the Evaluation of the Bengkulu Tennis School Athlete Achievement Development Program is in the category both as a whole and in the aspects of Context, Input, Process, and Product.

Keywords

CIIP Evaluation Tennis

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Dedi Ansyah, Damrah, Alnedral, Asep Sujana Wahyuri, Septian Raibowo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Dedi Ansyah, Damrah, Alnedral, & Sujana Wahyuri, A. (2022). Evaluation of Achievement Development Program of Bengkulu Tennis School. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 6(4), 789–797. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v6i4.25682
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Alnedral. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan dribbling sepakbola dengan pendekatan bermain. Cerdas Sifa, 3(2), 42–53.
  2. Ambiyar & Muhardika. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Evaluasi Program. In Alfabeta. Alfabeta.
  3. Amin, A., Ilmu, J. K., & Vol, B. I. (2020). No Title. 3(1), 37–53.
  4. Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1553
  5. Damrah. (2020). Program Sentra Pembinaan Tenis Daerah. Sukabina.
  6. Frye, A. W., & Hemmer, P. A. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67. In Medical Teacher (Vol. 34, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637
  7. Haryono, I. C., Asmawi, M., & Lubis, J. (2019). Evaluation on the students’ sports training and development center (PPLOP) program in central Java. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 22(11). https://doi.org/10.36295/ASRO.2019.221134
  8. Herdiansyah, H., Sitepu, T. J., Rahmania, T., & Hakim, L. (2010). Mendorong prestasi olahraga melalui kebijakan pendanaan dan fiskal. Laporan Penelitian Dan Rekomendasi, November.
  9. Karmo, A. Do, Tangkudung, J., & Asmawi, M. (2019). An evaluation of the traditional sports festival program at the national level. Indonesian Journal of Education Review, 6(1).
  10. Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. 6(1).
  11. Nugroho, W. A. (2017). Pembinaan Prestasi Olahraga Sepakbola Di Pusat Pendidikan Dan Latihan Putra Batang. JUARA : Jurnal Olahraga, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33222/juara.v2i2.43
  12. Safiuddin, S., Margono, G., & Mardapi, D. (2017). Evaluation Program Of The Football Athlete Developments. IJER - Indonesian Journal Of Educational Review, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.21009/ijer.04.02.05
  13. Sudarko, R. A. (2009). Peningkatan Kualitas Prosedur dan Evaluasi Olahraga Unggulan Propinsi Kalimantan Timur. Aspectos Generales De La Planificación Tributaria En Venezuela, 2009(75), 31–47. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/94/1/Peningkatan_kualitas_prosedur_evaluasi_olahraga_Unggulan_Kaltim.pdf
  14. Sudjana, S. (2008). Manajemen Program Pendidikan untuk Pendidikan Luar Sekolah dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Pendidikan. In Remaja Rosdakarya.
  15. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 11 Tahun 2022. (2022).
  16. Wahyuri, A. S. (2022). Evaluasi Olahraga Gateball Kota Padang. UNP Press, 22 Nomor 2(2722–7030). https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results