Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 22, 2024
Accepted
October 4, 2024
Published
September 30, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 52 Download : 45

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Achievement of learning outcomes is an indicator to measure the quality of the learning process that has been implemented. However, achieving optimal learning outcomes is not an easy thing for lecturers in charge of the subject because many factors influence it, including the learning model and student learning interest while in class. Therefore, lecturers must be able to apply learning models that can increase interest in learning. The application of cooperative scripts with mind map variations as a learning model is feasible to be applied to the adaptive physical education learning process. Classroom action research with 2 cycles was chosen as the research method. The goal to be achieved in this study is to analyze the increased interest and learning outcomes of physical education students through the application of cooperative scripts with variations of mind maps in adaptive physical education lectures. The research data was accommodated using instruments in the form of observation, questionnaires, and written tests. The collected data were analyzed using simple statistics in the form of average values and percentages. The results of the study illustrate that there is an increase in interest in learning and learning outcomes. It can be concluded that cooperative scripts with mind map variations can be an alternative to increase student interest and learning outcomes.

Keywords

cooperative learning Interest Learning Result

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Syafrial Syafrial, Yahya Eko Nopiyanto, Fiona Sarah Musfita, Nurul Fajar Muslimah Ningrum, Tono Sugihartono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Authors who publish in this journal agree with the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA)  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Syafrial, S., Yahya Eko Nopiyanto, Fiona Sarah Musfita, Nurul Fajar Muslimah Ningrum, & Sugihartono, T. (2024). Application of Cooperative Script with Mind Map Variations as an Effort to Increase Physical Education Students’ Interest and Learning Outcomes. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 8(3), 647–652. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v8i3.33493
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Armariena, D. N. (2020). Penulisan Makalah Mahasiswa Pada Mku Bahasa Indonesia Dengan Metode Mind Mapping. Wahana Didaktika : Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 17(2), 258. https://doi.org/10.31851/wahanadidaktika.v17i2.4147
  2. Ermawati, E., Suratno, S., & Pujiastuti, P. (2019). The Effect of Inquiry Learning Model Based on Cooperative Script on the Student Learning Achievement. Pancaran Pendidikan, 8(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.25037/pancaran.v8i1.216
  3. Faisal, R., & Anthoni, L. (2021). Analysis of the Impact Education to Interest and Effected to Entrepreneur Success for Student. Journal Of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 2(1), 26–38.
  4. Fardhila, R. R., & Istiyono, E. (2019). An assessment instrument of mind map product to assess students’ creative thinking skill. Research and Evaluation in Education, 5(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i1.22525
  5. Keller, M. M., Goetz, T., Becker, E. S., Morger, V., & Hensley, L. (2014). Feeling and showing: A new conceptualization of dispositional teacher enthusiasm and its relation to students’ interest. Learning and Instruction, 33, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.001
  6. Lin, J. W., Yen, M. H., Liang, J. C., Chiu, M. H., & Guo, C. J. (2016). Examining the factors that influence students’ science learning processes and their learning outcomes: 30 years of conceptual change research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2617–2646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a
  7. Ma’ruf, A. H., Syafii, M., & Kusuma, A. P. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Mind Mapping Berbasis HOTS terhadap Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i3.552
  8. Mahajan, M., & Singh, M. K. S. (2017). Importance and Benefits of Learning Outcomes. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(03), 65–67. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2203056567
  9. Ngai, G., Chan, S. C. F., & Kwan, K. P. (2018). Challenge, meaning, interest, and preparation: Critical success factors influencing student learning outcomes from service-learning. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 22(4), 55–80.
  10. Ngoc, T. H., Van Nhan, P., Son, D. H., Duc, T. T. A., & Nam, T. G. (2020). Lecturer professional development strategies in a higher education institution in ha tinh province at a time of educational reforms. Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, 2, 128–151. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2020-2-128-151
  11. Nurhayatin, T., & Triandy, R. (2019). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Script Dalam Perkuliahan Teori & Praktik Pembelajaran Menyimak Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Prestasi, Aktivitas, Dan Keterampilan Berbicara Pada Mahasiswa. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 5(2), 290–301.
  12. Sihaloho, B. (2023). The Influence Of The Inquiry Learning Model On Student Learning Outcomes. Mahir : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 2(3), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.58432/mahir.v2i3.1028
  13. Simonds, T. A., & Brock, B. L. (2014). Relationship between age, experience, and student preference for types of learning activities in online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2014.1.3
  14. Walter, J., Lechner, C., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2016). Learning Activities, Exploration, and the Performance of Strategic Initiatives. In Journal of Management (Vol. 42, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313506463
  15. Zahedi, M., & Heaton, L. (2016). Mind mapping as a tool, as a process, as a problem/solution space. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Design Education: Collaboration and Cross-Disciplinarity, E and PDE 2016, September, 166–171.
  16. Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving creative thinking skills of students through Differentiated Science Inquiry integrated with mind map. Journal of Turkish Science