Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between the sport education model and motivation on the learning outcomes of Physical Education. This study used correlational research. The population of all students of Cijaralang 2 Elementary School with a total of 180 students consisting of grades I to VI, the sampling technique used Cluster Random sampling, and the research sample was 51 students of grade V of Cijaralang 2 Elementary School. The research instruments used in this study were questionnaires to measure the sport education model, questionnaires to measure motivation and documentation to measure physical education learning outcomes. Research Results There is a positive and significant relationship between the Sport Education Model and motivation on the learning outcomes of physical education students of Cijaralang 2 Elementary School, this is indicated by the calculated F value> F table (228.753> 2.37) and a sig value of 0.000 <0.05. While the correlation value is 0.895. This relationship can be interpreted that the better the sport education model and motivation possessed by students, the higher the chances of students getting optimal physical education learning outcomes.

Keywords

Sports Education Model Motivation Learning outcomes Learning outcomes Motivation Sports Education Model

Article Details

How to Cite
Herna Hermansyah, H. H., akhmad Sobarna, & Muchamad Ishak. (2025). The Relationship Between Sport Education Model And Motivation Towards Physical Education Learning Outcomes . Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 9(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v9i1.40432

References

  1. Akhmad Sobarna, A. H. (2018). Improving Adolescent Life Skills through Sport Programs at the Child Correctional Institution. Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga, 3(1), 122–128. http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/penjas/index
  2. Barkoukis V, Taylor I, Chanal J, N. N. (2014). The relation between student motivation and student grades in physical education: A 3-year investigation. Scand J Med Sci Sports. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12174.
  3. Gómez-López, M., Granero-Gallegos, A., Baena-Extremera, A., & Arturo Abraldes, J. (2014). Goal Orientation Effects on Elite Handball Players Motivation and Motivational Climate. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 434–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.333
  4. Hamzah B, U. (2018). Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya. Bumi Akasara.
  5. Hayudi, H., Suherman, A., Sutresna, N., Yudiana, Y., Mulloh, F., & Putro, A. S. (2024). Tren penelitian digitalisasi pendidikan jasmani pada jurnal pendidikan jasmani di indonesia. 16, 65–70.
  6. Lesmana, S. (2023). Hubungan Media Modifikasi dengan Motivasi Belajar Penjas. Jurnal Master Penjas & Olahraga, 4(2), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.37742/jmpo.v4i2.95
  7. Lotulung, C. F., Ibrahim, N., & Tumurang, H. (2018). Effectiveness of Learning Method Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) for Increasing Learning Outcomes of Entrepreneurship Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 17(3), 37–46.
  8. Mullender-Wijnsma, M. J., Hartman, E., De Greeff, J. W., Doolaard, S., Bosker, R. J., & Visscher, C. (2016). Physically active math and language lessons improve academic achievement: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 137(3). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2743
  9. Perlman, D. (2014). The influence of the Sport Education Model on amotivated students’ in-class physical activity. European Physical Education Review, 18(3), 335.
  10. Ramadan, G. (2017). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Passing Sepakbola. JUARA : Jurnal Olahraga, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.33222/juara.v2i1.27
  11. Sardiman. (2016). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar-Mengajar. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  12. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  13. Suharsimi Arikunto. (2016). Sampel Penelitian. Universitas Negeri yogjakarta.
  14. Tangkudung, J., Aini, K., & Tangkudung, A. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian: Kajian Dalam Olahraga. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  15. Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., & Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.002
  16. Trenshaw, K. F., Revelo, R. A., Earl, K. A., & Herman, G. L. (2016). Using self determination theory principles to promote engineering students’ intrinsic motivation to learn. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(3), 1194–1207.
  17. Verena Jurik, Alexander Gröschner, Tina Seidel. (2014). Predicting students’ cognitive learning activity and intrinsic learning motivation: How powerful are teacher statements, student profiles, and gender?, Learning and Individual Differences,. Volume 32, 132–139. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.01.005.
  18. Z. Engin and P. Treleaven. (2019). Algorithmic Government: Automating Public Services and Supporting Civil Servants in using Data Science Technologies. In The Computer Journal, 62, n. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxy082
  19. Zriah, N. (2017). Metodologi penelitian sosial dan pendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.