Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the reading preferences of students of Sports Coaching Education Study Program Batch 2023, Faculty of Sports Science, Universitas Negeri Semarang. Reading is an activity that is sometimes neglected in the era of technological advancement, despite the fact that reading is very important for the development of knowledge and critical thinking skills (literacy). This research uses a quantitative design, with a descriptive type of research design. The data collection method uses a survey in the form of a questionnaire made through google form. The sample of this research is the 2023 students of the Sports Coaching Education Study Program, Faculty of Sports Science, Semarang State University. The research results are detailed according to the components or indicators of the test instrument (can be in the form of numbers and %). It shows that various factors, including time management, access to reading materials, and academic environment, have an impact on students' reading interest. The conclusion of this study suggests that in order to enhance intellectual capacity and facilitate learning, students should build good reading habits.

Keywords

Academic environment Literacy development Reading interest

Article Details

How to Cite
Syifa Kamila, S. (2025). Analysis of Determinants of Reading Interest among Sports Coaching Students in the Digital Transformation Era: A Quantitative Descriptive Study : Determinants of Reading Interest among Sports Coahing Students. Kinestetik : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 9(4), 941–951. https://doi.org/10.33369/jk.v9i4.45887

References

  1. Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M.-D., Infante-Moro, J. C., & Ruipérez García, G. (2020). Sustainable Management of Digital Transformation in Higher Education: Global Research Trends. Sustainability, 12(5), 2107. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052107
  2. Acheampong, N. O., Hayford, S. K., Nana, G., Rockson, Y., & Dogbe, D. (2020). DigitalCommons @ University of Nebraska - Lincoln ACCESS TO LIBRARY FACILITIES AND RESOURCES BY STUDENTS WITH VISUAL IMPAIRMENT AT UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION ,. November.
  3. Al Falaq, J., Suprayogi, S., Susanto, F. N., & Ul Husna, A. (2021). Exploring The Potentials of Wattpad For Literature Class. Indonesian Journal of Learning Studies IJLS, 1(2), 98–105.
  4. Azizi, Z., Namaziandost, E., & Rezai, A. (2022). Potential of podcasting and blogging in cultivating Iranian advanced EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Heliyon, 8(5), e09473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09473
  5. Bowers, J. S. (2020). Reconsidering the Evidence That Systematic Phonics Is More Effective Than Alternative Methods of Reading Instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 681–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09515-y
  6. Budhi Pamungkas Gautama, Yuliawati, A. K., Nurhayati, N. S., Fitriyani, E., & Pratiwi, I. I. (2020). PENGEMBANGAN DESA WISATA MELALUI PENDEKATAN PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT. BERNAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(4), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.31949/jb.v1i4.414
  7. Carretti, B., Toffalini, E., Saponaro, C., Viola, F., & Cornoldi, C. (2020). Text reading speed in a language with a shallow orthography benefits less from comprehension as reading ability matures. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(S1), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12307
  8. Chatzikyriakidou, K., & McCartney, M. (2022). Motivation in Reading Primary Scientific Literature: a questionnaire to assess student purpose and efficacy in reading disciplinary literature. International Journal of Science Education, 44(8), 1230–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2073482
  9. Daumiller, M., Rinas, R., Hein, J., Janke, S., Dickhäuser, O., & Dresel, M. (2021). Shifting from face-to-face to online teaching during COVID-19: The role of university faculty achievement goals for attitudes towards this sudden change, and their relevance for burnout/engagement and student evaluations of teaching quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106677
  10. Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The Science of Reading Progresses: Communicating Advances Beyond the Simple View of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
  11. Fahmi, F., Setiadi, I., Elmawati, D., & Sunardi, S. (2019). Discovery Learning Method for Training Critical Thinking Skills of Students. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(3), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3345924
  12. Hilliker, S. M., & Loranc, B. (2022). Development of 21st century skills through virtual exchange. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103646
  13. Latini, N., Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Salmerón, L. (2019). Investigating effects of reading medium and reading purpose on behavioral engagement and textual integration in a multiple text context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101797
  14. Peng, P., & Kievit, R. A. (2020). The Development of Academic Achievement and Cognitive Abilities: A Bidirectional Perspective. Child Development Perspectives, 14(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12352
  15. Simatupang, E., & Yuhertiana, I. (2021). Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka terhadap Perubahan Paradigma Pembelajaran pada Pendidikan Tinggi: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur. Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen, Dan Ekonomi, 2(2), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.47747/jbme.v2i2.230
  16. Townsend, D., Carter, H., & Knecht, R. (2023). What’s the Purpose? A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Purposes for Reading in Secondary Classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 39(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2022.2046220
  17. Valenzuela, Á., & Castillo, R. D. (2023). The effect of communicative purpose and reading medium on pauses during different phases of the textualization process. Reading and Writing, 36(4), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10309-y
  18. Veissière, S. P. L., Constant, A., Ramstead, M. J. D., Friston, K. J., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2020). Thinking through other minds: A variational approach to cognition and culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43, e90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X19001213
  19. Yang, C., & Cole, C. L. (2022). Smart Stadium as a Laboratory of Innovation: Technology, Sport, and Datafied Normalization of the Fans. Communication & Sport, 10(2), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479520943579
  20. Zhang, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Research on Effective Strategies of College Physical Education Interactive Teaching Based on Machine Learning. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2022, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1843514