Main Article Content
Abstract
Speech acts in learning are important because they are a means to educate, guide, and facilitate interaction between teachers and students. Forms of speech acts have contextual meanings aimed at understanding the meaning conveyed by the teacher. The purpose of this research is to describe the forms of locutionary, locutionary, and perlocutionary speech acts in the interaction between teachers and students in learning Indonesian by 18th grade students of SMPN 15 Bengkulu Tengah. This research uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The data sources are teachers and students of class VIII of SMPN l5 lBengkulu lTengah. The data collection technique uses observation and documentation techniques. The researcher uses a research instrument in the form of a speech act classification table based on an observation table containing categories or outlines of research data and documentation in the form of audio visual recordings of teacher interactions with students in the classroom. Then the data analysis uses the following stages: recording, recording, coding, grouping data, analyzing, and presenting conclusions. The results of the study show that: (1) The locutionary speech acts that appear are in the form of notification speech. Without any intention or purpose in the communication, it is only for telling a story or simply informing. (2) The locutionary speech acts are of five types that were studied, including expressive, declarative, expressive, directive, and commissive. l As for locutionary speech acts, the dominant form of the locutionary act appears in the form of an opinion-expressing function, in the locutionary speech act, the dominant form of the locutionary act appears in the form of a prohibiting function, in the locutionary speech act, the dominant form of the locutionary act appears in the form of annoyance function, in the locutionary speech act, the dominant form of the locutionary act appears in the form of a commanding function, and in the locutionary speech act, the dominant form of the locutionary act appears in the form of a threatening function; and l (3) Perlocutionary speech acts aim to influence the speech interlocutor and have an effect. In this research, the perlocutionary speech acts that emerge are not only in the form of utterances but also actions in the form of movements of the teacher's body parts as signals that can be directly understood by students.
Keywords
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2025 Firda Rimadona Firda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree with the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
- Abubakar, R. (2021). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
- Adriana, I. (2018). Pragmatik. Surabaya. Jember: Pena Salsabila.
- Aldila, Caesar. 2022. “Analisis Tuturan Guru dalam Berinteraksi di Kelas dengan Pendekatan Pragmatik SDN 4 Wandanpulo.” Skripsi 104.
- Anggraini, Y., A.D., & F. (2017). Interaksi Belajar Mengajar. Medan: UNM.
- Ansar, dkk. (2024). Dasar-Dasar Komunikasi Pengantar Komprehensif untuk Pemahaman Proses Komunikasi. Medan: Media Penerbit Indonesia
- Arief, N.F. (2015). Tindak Tutur Guru dalam Wacana Kelas. Malang: Worldwide Readers.
- Arma, K.D., & K. (2022). Tindak Tutur dan Kesantunan. Jawa Barat: PRCI.
- Asdar, H.A., M.& A. (2021). Pembelajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: CV. Semiotika.
- Citriadin, Y. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Mataram: Sanabil.
- Djamaluddin, A., & W. (2019). Belajar dan Pembelajaran: 4 Pilar Peningkatan Kompetensi Pedagogis. Jakarta: CV. Kaaffah Learning Centre.
- Hafid, Abd. (2023). Bahasa Indonesia Untuk Guru Sekolah Dasar. Makassar: CV. Tahta Media Grup.
- Harahap, N. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif. Sumatera Utara: Wal Ashri Publishing.
- Hardani, dkk. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu.
- Hasmi, L. (2018). Tindak Tutur Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Menara Ilmu, 12(7), 61. https://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/menarailmu/article/view/488
- Mamik. (2015). Metodologi Kualitatif. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Publisher.
- Maujud, F.& S. (2019). Pragmatik: Teori dan Analisis Makna Konteks dalam Bahasa. Mataram. Mataram: Perpustakaan UIN Mataram.
- Mundir. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jember: STAIN Jember Press.
- Noviandara, F., B.A., & M. (2022). Analisis Tindak Tutur dalam Kegiatan Berbicara pada Pembelajaran Teks Berita sebagai Alternatif Bahan Ajar Kelas VIII SMP Pasundan 8 Bandung. Skripsi, FKIP UNPAS, http://repository.unpas.ac.id/61079/
- Nugrahani, F. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia. Surakarta.
- Nugraheni, Y. (2011). Implikatur Percakapan Tokoh Wanita dan Tokoh Laki-Laki dalam Film Harry Potter and The Goblet the Fire. Unimus, 1(2): 183–193. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/lensa/article/view/188
- Nuramila. (2020). Kajian Pragmatik Tindak Tutur dalam Media Sosial. Banten: YPSIM.
- Nurwahyudi. (2023). Analisis Interaksi Edukatif Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar. MindSet: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(1): 40. https://journal.staimaarifkalirejo.ac.id/index.php/mindset/article/view/73
- Pitoyo, A. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Interaksi Belajar Mengajar Bahasa Indonesia. Kediri: CV. Dimar Intermedia.
- Purba, A. (2011). Tindak Tutur dan Peristiwa Tutur. Pena: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(1): 77–91. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/pena/article/view/1426
- Rismawati. (2019). Tindak Tutur Guru dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar Di Paud It Mina Aceh Besar. Jurnal Metamorfosa, 7(2): 153–160. https://ejournal.bbg.ac.id/metamorfosa/article/view/259
- Rohana & Syamsuddin. (2015). Analisis Wacana. Makassar: Samudra Alif-MIM.
- Rohmadi, M. (2014). Kajian Pragmatik Percakapan Guru dan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Paedagogia 17(1):53–61. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/paedagogia/article/view/36034
- Sebtiana, Yayuk. (2018). “Tuturan Lokusi, Ilokusi, Dan Perlokusi Dalam Interaksi Pembelajaran Siswa Kelas VII Di SMP Negeri 2 Jumapolo.” Skripsi (21):21.
- Setiawan, A. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Sidoharjo: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
- Sumarlam, dkk. (2023). Pemahaman dan Kajian Pragmatik. Solo: Bukukatta.
- Wiratno, T.& S.R. (2014). Pengantar Linguistik Umum: Bahasa, Fungsi Bahasa, dan Konteks Sosial. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
- Woro, R. (2014). Kajian Pragmatik dalam Studi Linguistik. Yogyakarta: CV. Hidayah.
- Yuliantoro, A. (2020.) Analisis Pragmatik. Surakarta: UNS Press.
References
Abubakar, R. (2021). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Adriana, I. (2018). Pragmatik. Surabaya. Jember: Pena Salsabila.
Aldila, Caesar. 2022. “Analisis Tuturan Guru dalam Berinteraksi di Kelas dengan Pendekatan Pragmatik SDN 4 Wandanpulo.” Skripsi 104.
Anggraini, Y., A.D., & F. (2017). Interaksi Belajar Mengajar. Medan: UNM.
Ansar, dkk. (2024). Dasar-Dasar Komunikasi Pengantar Komprehensif untuk Pemahaman Proses Komunikasi. Medan: Media Penerbit Indonesia
Arief, N.F. (2015). Tindak Tutur Guru dalam Wacana Kelas. Malang: Worldwide Readers.
Arma, K.D., & K. (2022). Tindak Tutur dan Kesantunan. Jawa Barat: PRCI.
Asdar, H.A., M.& A. (2021). Pembelajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: CV. Semiotika.
Citriadin, Y. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Mataram: Sanabil.
Djamaluddin, A., & W. (2019). Belajar dan Pembelajaran: 4 Pilar Peningkatan Kompetensi Pedagogis. Jakarta: CV. Kaaffah Learning Centre.
Hafid, Abd. (2023). Bahasa Indonesia Untuk Guru Sekolah Dasar. Makassar: CV. Tahta Media Grup.
Harahap, N. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif. Sumatera Utara: Wal Ashri Publishing.
Hardani, dkk. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu.
Hasmi, L. (2018). Tindak Tutur Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Menara Ilmu, 12(7), 61. https://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/menarailmu/article/view/488
Mamik. (2015). Metodologi Kualitatif. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Publisher.
Maujud, F.& S. (2019). Pragmatik: Teori dan Analisis Makna Konteks dalam Bahasa. Mataram. Mataram: Perpustakaan UIN Mataram.
Mundir. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jember: STAIN Jember Press.
Noviandara, F., B.A., & M. (2022). Analisis Tindak Tutur dalam Kegiatan Berbicara pada Pembelajaran Teks Berita sebagai Alternatif Bahan Ajar Kelas VIII SMP Pasundan 8 Bandung. Skripsi, FKIP UNPAS, http://repository.unpas.ac.id/61079/
Nugrahani, F. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia. Surakarta.
Nugraheni, Y. (2011). Implikatur Percakapan Tokoh Wanita dan Tokoh Laki-Laki dalam Film Harry Potter and The Goblet the Fire. Unimus, 1(2): 183–193. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/lensa/article/view/188
Nuramila. (2020). Kajian Pragmatik Tindak Tutur dalam Media Sosial. Banten: YPSIM.
Nurwahyudi. (2023). Analisis Interaksi Edukatif Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar. MindSet: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(1): 40. https://journal.staimaarifkalirejo.ac.id/index.php/mindset/article/view/73
Pitoyo, A. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Interaksi Belajar Mengajar Bahasa Indonesia. Kediri: CV. Dimar Intermedia.
Purba, A. (2011). Tindak Tutur dan Peristiwa Tutur. Pena: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(1): 77–91. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/pena/article/view/1426
Rismawati. (2019). Tindak Tutur Guru dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar Di Paud It Mina Aceh Besar. Jurnal Metamorfosa, 7(2): 153–160. https://ejournal.bbg.ac.id/metamorfosa/article/view/259
Rohana & Syamsuddin. (2015). Analisis Wacana. Makassar: Samudra Alif-MIM.
Rohmadi, M. (2014). Kajian Pragmatik Percakapan Guru dan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Paedagogia 17(1):53–61. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/paedagogia/article/view/36034
Sebtiana, Yayuk. (2018). “Tuturan Lokusi, Ilokusi, Dan Perlokusi Dalam Interaksi Pembelajaran Siswa Kelas VII Di SMP Negeri 2 Jumapolo.” Skripsi (21):21.
Setiawan, A. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Sidoharjo: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
Sumarlam, dkk. (2023). Pemahaman dan Kajian Pragmatik. Solo: Bukukatta.
Wiratno, T.& S.R. (2014). Pengantar Linguistik Umum: Bahasa, Fungsi Bahasa, dan Konteks Sosial. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Woro, R. (2014). Kajian Pragmatik dalam Studi Linguistik. Yogyakarta: CV. Hidayah.
Yuliantoro, A. (2020.) Analisis Pragmatik. Surakarta: UNS Press.