Main Article Content

Abstract

Speech acts in learning are important because they are a means to educate, guide, and facilitate interaction between teachers and students. Forms of speech acts have contextual meanings aimed at understanding the meaning conveyed by the teacher. The purpose of this research is to describe the forms of locutionary, locutionary, and perlocutionary speech acts in the interaction between teachers and students in learning Indonesian by 18th grade students of SMPN 15 Bengkulu Tengah. This research uses a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The data sources are teachers and students of class VIII of SMPN l5 lBengkulu lTengah. The data collection technique uses observation and documentation techniques. The researcher uses a research instrument in the form of a speech act classification table based on an observation table containing categories or outlines of research data and documentation in the form of audio visual recordings of teacher interactions with students in the classroom. Then the data analysis uses the following stages: recording, recording, coding, grouping data, analyzing, and presenting conclusions. The results of the study show that: (1) The locutionary speech acts that appear are in the form of notification speech. Without any intention or purpose in the communication, it is only for telling a story or simply informing. (2) The locutionary speech acts are of five types that were studied, including expressive, declarative, expressive, directive, and commissive. l As for locutionary speech acts, the dominant form of the locutionary act appears in the form of an opinion-expressing function, in the locutionary speech act, the dominant form of the locutionary act appears in the form of a prohibiting function, in the locutionary speech act, the dominant form of the locutionary act appears in the form of annoyance function, in the locutionary speech act, the dominant form of the locutionary act appears in the form of a commanding function, and in the locutionary speech act, the dominant form of the locutionary act appears in the form of a threatening function; and l (3) Perlocutionary speech acts aim to influence the speech interlocutor and have an effect. In this research, the perlocutionary speech acts that emerge are not only in the form of utterances but also actions in the form of movements of the teacher's body parts as signals that can be directly understood by students.

Keywords

Speech Act Locution Illocution Perlocution Indonesian Tindak Tutur Lokusi Ilokusi Perlokusi Bahasa Indonesia

Article Details

Author Biographies

Firda Rimadona, Universitas Bengkulu

Mahasiswa Universitas Bengkulu

Catur Wulandari, Universitas Bengkulu

Dosen Universitas Bengkulu

Didi Yulistio, Universitas Bengkulu

Dosen Universitas Bengkulu

How to Cite
Rimadona, F., Wulandari, C., & Yulistio, D. (2025). Tindak Tutur pada Interaksi Guru dan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kelas VIII di SMPN 5 Bengkulu Tengah. Jurnal Ilmiah KORPUS, 9(1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.33369/jik.v9i1.40316

References

  1. Abubakar, R. (2021). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
  2. Adriana, I. (2018). Pragmatik. Surabaya. Jember: Pena Salsabila.
  3. Aldila, Caesar. 2022. “Analisis Tuturan Guru dalam Berinteraksi di Kelas dengan Pendekatan Pragmatik SDN 4 Wandanpulo.” Skripsi 104.
  4. Anggraini, Y., A.D., & F. (2017). Interaksi Belajar Mengajar. Medan: UNM.
  5. Ansar, dkk. (2024). Dasar-Dasar Komunikasi Pengantar Komprehensif untuk Pemahaman Proses Komunikasi. Medan: Media Penerbit Indonesia
  6. Arief, N.F. (2015). Tindak Tutur Guru dalam Wacana Kelas. Malang: Worldwide Readers.
  7. Arma, K.D., & K. (2022). Tindak Tutur dan Kesantunan. Jawa Barat: PRCI.
  8. Asdar, H.A., M.& A. (2021). Pembelajaran Pragmatik. Bandung: CV. Semiotika.
  9. Citriadin, Y. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Mataram: Sanabil.
  10. Djamaluddin, A., & W. (2019). Belajar dan Pembelajaran: 4 Pilar Peningkatan Kompetensi Pedagogis. Jakarta: CV. Kaaffah Learning Centre.
  11. Hafid, Abd. (2023). Bahasa Indonesia Untuk Guru Sekolah Dasar. Makassar: CV. Tahta Media Grup.
  12. Harahap, N. (2020). Penelitian Kualitatif. Sumatera Utara: Wal Ashri Publishing.
  13. Hardani, dkk. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu.
  14. Hasmi, L. (2018). Tindak Tutur Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Menara Ilmu, 12(7), 61. https://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/menarailmu/article/view/488
  15. Mamik. (2015). Metodologi Kualitatif. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Publisher.
  16. Maujud, F.& S. (2019). Pragmatik: Teori dan Analisis Makna Konteks dalam Bahasa. Mataram. Mataram: Perpustakaan UIN Mataram.
  17. Mundir. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jember: STAIN Jember Press.
  18. Noviandara, F., B.A., & M. (2022). Analisis Tindak Tutur dalam Kegiatan Berbicara pada Pembelajaran Teks Berita sebagai Alternatif Bahan Ajar Kelas VIII SMP Pasundan 8 Bandung. Skripsi, FKIP UNPAS, http://repository.unpas.ac.id/61079/
  19. Nugrahani, F. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia. Surakarta.
  20. Nugraheni, Y. (2011). Implikatur Percakapan Tokoh Wanita dan Tokoh Laki-Laki dalam Film Harry Potter and The Goblet the Fire. Unimus, 1(2): 183–193. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/lensa/article/view/188
  21. Nuramila. (2020). Kajian Pragmatik Tindak Tutur dalam Media Sosial. Banten: YPSIM.
  22. Nurwahyudi. (2023). Analisis Interaksi Edukatif Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar. MindSet: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(1): 40. https://journal.staimaarifkalirejo.ac.id/index.php/mindset/article/view/73
  23. Pitoyo, A. (2016). Dasar-Dasar Interaksi Belajar Mengajar Bahasa Indonesia. Kediri: CV. Dimar Intermedia.
  24. Purba, A. (2011). Tindak Tutur dan Peristiwa Tutur. Pena: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 1(1): 77–91. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/pena/article/view/1426
  25. Rismawati. (2019). Tindak Tutur Guru dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar Di Paud It Mina Aceh Besar. Jurnal Metamorfosa, 7(2): 153–160. https://ejournal.bbg.ac.id/metamorfosa/article/view/259
  26. Rohana & Syamsuddin. (2015). Analisis Wacana. Makassar: Samudra Alif-MIM.
  27. Rohmadi, M. (2014). Kajian Pragmatik Percakapan Guru dan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Paedagogia 17(1):53–61. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/paedagogia/article/view/36034
  28. Sebtiana, Yayuk. (2018). “Tuturan Lokusi, Ilokusi, Dan Perlokusi Dalam Interaksi Pembelajaran Siswa Kelas VII Di SMP Negeri 2 Jumapolo.” Skripsi (21):21.
  29. Setiawan, A. (2017). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Sidoharjo: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
  30. Sumarlam, dkk. (2023). Pemahaman dan Kajian Pragmatik. Solo: Bukukatta.
  31. Wiratno, T.& S.R. (2014). Pengantar Linguistik Umum: Bahasa, Fungsi Bahasa, dan Konteks Sosial. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
  32. Woro, R. (2014). Kajian Pragmatik dalam Studi Linguistik. Yogyakarta: CV. Hidayah.
  33. Yuliantoro, A. (2020.) Analisis Pragmatik. Surakarta: UNS Press.