Meta Analisis Efektivitas Pendekatan Ekonomi dalam Program Rehabilitasi Hutan
Abstract
Determining the economic value of forest rehabilitation activities is important to provide the real value of the resource based on the community's perspective. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the economic value approach in forest rehabilitation programs is a systematic review that aims to collect and analyze data from various studies that have been conducted regarding the effectiveness of the economic approach in forest rehabilitation programs. Based on the results of the study, it shows that forest resource economics has a very fundamental position in forest management, without consideration or economic analysis, forest management efficiency is difficult to achieve. Evaluations of forest and land rehabilitation that have been carried out to date are still focused on activity accountability, only using measurements of the percentage of plant life, tree height, and level of health of plants resulting from forest and land rehabilitation, which is not enough to evaluate the total success rate of forest rehabilitation. The need to consider economic aspects as part of the design and strategy of forest rehabilitation projects.
Full text article
References
Barbier, B. E. 2000. The economic linkages between rural poverty and land degradation: some evidence from Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 82: 355-370.
Beukering, V. P. J. H., H. S. J. Cesar, & M. A. Janssen. Economic valuation of the Leuse National Park on Sumatra, Indonesia. Ecological Economics 44(1): 43-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00224-0
Choi, A. S., W. B. Ritchie, F. Papandrea, & J. Bennett. 2010. Economic valuation of cultural heritage sites: A choice modeling approach. Tourism Management, 31(2) : 213 220. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.014
Chokkalingam, U., J. Smith, W de Jong. 2001. A conceptual framework for the assessment of tropical secondary forest dynamics and sustainable development potential in Asia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 13(4): 577-600
Costanza, R., J. H. Cumberland, H. Daly, R. Goodland, & R. Norgaard. 1997. An Introduction to Ecological Economics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003040842
Costanza, R., R, d’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. V. O’Neill, J. Paruelo, R. G. Raskin, P. Sutton, & M. V. D. Belt. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
Dixon, J. A, & P. B. Sherman. 1990. Economics of Protected Areas. A New Look at Benefits and Cost. Washington, DC : East West Center.
Dunkiel, B., & S. Sugarman. 1998. Complaint for Declaratory, Mandatory, and Injunctive Relief. United States District Court for the District of Vermont. Burlington, Vermont.
Dwyer, J. F., E. G. Mc Pherson, H. W. Schroeder, & R. A. Rowntree. 1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 18(5): 227-34.
Fakultas Kehutanan IPB. 1999. Kajian Sistem Produksi. Bogor : Fakultas Kehutanan IPB.
Holmes, T. P. J. C. Bergstrom, E. Huszar, S. B. Kask, & F. Orr III. 2004. Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits, and the scale of riparian ecosystem restoration. Ecological Economics, 49(1): 19-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.015
Jacobs, M. 1991.The Green Economy: Environment. Sustainablev Development and the Politics of the Future. Pluto Press, London.
Kobayashi, S. 2004. Landscape rehabilitation of degraded tropical forest ecosystems case study of the CIFOR/Japan project in Indonesia and Peru. Forest Ecology and Management, 201(1): 13-22.
Magrath, W. B., C. M. Peters, N. Kishor, & P. Kishor. 1995.The Economic Supply of Biodiversity in West Kalimantan: Preliminary Results. In S. Shen & A. C. Hermosilla, editor. Environmental and Economic Issue in Forestry. Selected Case Study in Asia. Washington DC: World Bank, Asia Technical Departement Series, Technical Paper 281: 18-21.
Mahapatra, A. K., & D. D. Tewari. 2005. Importance of non-timber forest products in the economic valuation of dry deciduous forests of India. Forest Policy and Economics, 7(3): 455– 467.
Mau, P. N., V. A. Hoang, K. K. Dang, & N. B. D. Thi. 2003. Forestry Extension In relation With The 5 Million Hectare Resforestation Program (%MHRP). Development of National Forest Plocies and Strategies Sweden –Thailand.
McPherson, E. G. 1992. Accounting for Benefits and Costs of Urban Green Space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 22: 41-51.
Myers, N. 1996. Environmental Services of Biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences, USA 93: 2764-69.
Nawir, A. A., Murniati., & L. Rumboko. 2008. Rehabilitasi hutan di Indonesia: akan kemanakah arahnya setelah lebih dari tiga dasawarsa?. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). SMK Grafika Desa Putera. Bogor.
New York Declaration on Forests Action Statements and Action Plans.Climate Summit 2014. 23 September 2014. New York.
Niskanen, A. 1998.Value of external environmental impacts of reforestation in Thailand. Ecological Economics, 26(3): 287-297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921 8009(97)00121-3
Nurfatriani, F. 2005. Nilai Ekonomi Kawasan Yang Direhabilitasi (Hutan dan Lahan) Studi Kasus Proyek RHL Kecamatan Nglipar Kabupaten Gunung Kidul, Propinsi DIY. Tesis Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Panayotou, T., & P. S. Ashton. 1992. Not by Timber Alone: Economics and Ecology for Sustaining Tropical Forest. Washington DC: Island Press.
Pimentel, D., C. Wilson, C. McCullum, R. Huang, P. Dwen, J. Flack, Q. Tran, T. Saltman, & B. Cliff. 1997. Economic and Environmental Benefits of Biodiversity. BioScience, 47(11): 747-757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1313097
Purwaningsih, E. 2006. Studi Manfaat Kegiatan Rehabilitasi dalam Peningkatan Pendapatan dan Reduksi Gangguan Terhadap Kawasan Taman Nasional Meru Betiri. Departemen Konservasi Sumber daya Hutan dan Ekowisata Fakultas Kehutanan. Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Ramdan, H., Yusran, & D. Darusman. 2003. Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam dan Otonomi Daerah; Perspektif Kebijakan dan Valuasi Ekonomi. Algaprint: Jatinangor.
Toma, T., A. Nawir, C. Sabogal, U. Chokkalingham, W. De Jong, & T. Gumartini. 2004. Review of Forest Rehabilitation Initiatives – Lessons from the Past. Executive Summary for CIFOR REHAB Country Syntheses.
Widiyastutik, E. 2010. Nilai Ekonomi Hasil Gerakan Nasional Rehabilitasi Hutan dan lahan (GERHAN) di Sub DAS Tirto Propinsi Jawa Tengah. Tesis. Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
Wu, S., Y. Hou, & G. Yuan. 2010. Valuation of forest ecosystem goods and services and forest natural capital of the Beijing municipality, China. Unasylva, 61: 28-36.
Zwane, A. P. 2007. Does poverty constrain deforestation? Econometric evidence from Peru. Journal of Development Economics, 84: 330-349.
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Yurike Yurike, Yudha Saktian Syafruddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in Naturalis agrees to the following terms:
Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply an article as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.
Naturalis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.