Analisis Efektivitas Kelembagaan Hutan Adat; Studi Kasus Hutan Adat Batu Kerbau di Kabupaten Muara Bungo Provinsi Jambi Perhutanan sosial, Hutan Adat Batu Kerbau, Kelembagaan
Abstract
Customary forests are one of the social forestry program schemes in Indonesia that provide legal access to local communities in forest management by strengthening the local wisdom of customary law communities. The research location is in the Batu Kerbau (buffalo stone) customary forest, Muara Bungo Regency, Jambi Province. The Batu Kerbau customary forest is the first forest formed in Muaro Bungo Regency in 2002. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of customary forest institutions in the management of the Batu Kerbau customary forest. The level of institutional effectiveness of the Batu Kerbau customary forest uses 8 (eight) criteria according to Ostrom (1990). Sampling of respondents was carried out using purposive sampling method so that 25 informants were obtained. Quantitative data analysis is based on the results of filling out the questionnaire which is then analyzed using a Likert Scale and for qualitative data obtained from interviews and descriptions to strengthen the results of quantitative data. The results of the study show that the level of effectiveness of the Batu Kerbau customary forest institution is classified as moderate for the level of existence or existence of customary forest with a percentage score of 61.80%. Some of these factors are divided into 2 factors, namely driving factors and inhibiting factors. The driving factor is in the form of clearly identified boundaries and strict sanctions in accordance with the level of guilt. The weakness factor is that the contribution of customary forests from the economic aspect to the livelihood structure of the Batu Kerbau
Keywords : Social forestry, Batu Kerbau customary forest, institutional
Full text article
References
Amelia, Fina. 2019. Analisis Efektivitas Kelembagaan Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi (KPHP) Bungo Unit II. Universitas Jambi. Jambi
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2009. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoretis praktis bagi mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Berwin, Golar dan Sustri. 2014. Analisis kelembagaan pengembangan hutan adat desa toro kecamatan kulawi kabupaten sigi provinsi sulawesi tengah. Jurnal Warta Rimba. 2(1) : 73-80
Dolšak N, Ostrom E. 2003. The challenges of the commons. Dolšak N, Ostrom E, editor. The Challenges of the Commons. London: The MIT Press.
Firdaus. 2018. Panduan Praktis Penerapan Kebijakan Perhutanan Sosial. Pusat Penelitian Kehutanan Internasional (CIFOR). Bogor
Hanafie, R. 2010. Pengantar Ekonomi Pertanian. Buku. C.V Andi. Yogyakarta. 308 hlm
Hockings M, Stolton S, Leverington F, Dudley N, Courrau J. 2006. Evaluating Effectiveness: A Framework for Assessing Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas 2nd Edition. WCPA Best Practice Protected Areas Guidlines. Gland: IUCN
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia. 2018. Status Hutan & Kehutanan Indonesia.
Kusnandar, Padmaningrum, D., Rahayu, W. dan Wibowo, A. 2013. Rancang bangun model kelembagaan agribisnis padi organik dalam mendukung ketahanan pangan. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan. 14(1) : 92-101.
Malalo, E. 2006. Hutan Adat Batu Kerbau: Perjuangan Yang Belum Selesai. KKI Warsi
Milles, Huberman. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta
Moleong LJ. 2004. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosda
Munasinghe M. 1992. Environmental economics and sustainable development. Paper presented at the UN Earth Summit. Rio de Janeiro. Washinton DC. Reprinted World Bank.
Nurrochmat, D. 2005. Strategi Pengelolaan Hutan: Upaya Menyelamatkan Rimba yang Tersisa. Buku. Pustaka Belajar. Yogyakarta. 178 hlm.
Nurbaiti. 2015. Analisis Collective action dalam pengelolaan dan rehabilitasi terumbu karang (studi kasus PIU coremap tahap II Kota Batam).Fakultas Ekonomi Bisnis Universitas Indonesia.Jakarta
Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institution for Collective Actions. Cambridge University Press. New York.
Ostrom, E. 2005. Doing institutional analysis : digging deeper than market and hierarchies. Springer Science and Business Media. 819-848.
Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Nomor 83. 2016. Perhutanan Sosial.Buku. KementrianLingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan.Jakarta
Peters, B. G. 2000. Institutional Theory: Problem and Prospects. 69 Political Science Series. Institute for Advance Studies. Vienna.
Sadrian AY. 2017. Analisis Kelembagaan Hutan Desa Di Desa Sinar Wajo Kecamatan Mendahara Ulu Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur. [Skripsi]. Universitas Jambi
Sari, N., Golar dan Toknok, B. 2013. Kelembagaan kelompok tani hutan program pendampingan scbfwm disekitar sub daerah aliran sungai miu (kasus Desa pakuli kecamatan gumbasa kabupaten sigi). Jurnal Warta Rimba. 1(1) : 916.
Sayuti. 2012. Penerapan kerangka common pool resources pada pengelolaan pembangkit listrik tenaga mikro hidro (Studi kasus di PLTMH Cinta Mekar,Subang).Fakultas Ekonomi.Universitas Indonesia.Jakarta
Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan research and development. Alfabeta. Bandung
Sumaryono, H. M., Agrianto, R., Peday, H. F. Z. dan Rahawarin, Y. Y. 2017. Potensi dan Pengembangan Hutan Lindung Ayamaru. Buku. Yogyakarta. 123 hlm.
Susetyo,H.S.E. 2014. Analisis kelembagaan pemanfaatan sumberdaya Taman Nasional Sebangau Kalimantan Tengah.Institut Pertanian Bogor.Bogor
Taher,Mahendra .2017. Indigenous community and sustainable forest management,Opportunity and challenges: an institutional analysis.Univesitas Andalas.Sumatera Barat
Authors
Copyright (c) 2025 Fazriyas Fazriyas, Ahmad Muzakkir muzakkir, Maria ulfa ulfa , Rahmad Nurmansah Rahmad, Ahyauddin Ahyauddin, agung kurnia agung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in Naturalis agrees to the following terms:
Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply an article as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.
Naturalis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.