Main Article Content

Abstract

LPDP Scholarship (Education Fund Management Institution) is the most sought after by prospective students who want to continue their studies in the country, especially for those who want to continue their studies abroad. Recently, LPDP experienced problems related to students who received LPDP scholarships but did not return to Indonesia in accordance with the rules that have been stated. Starting from the incident on twitter, the topic of "LPDP" became a trending topic among twitter users. So it is our concern to find out and analyze public opinion through this twitter social media. By comparing the results of two methods, namely Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naïve Bayes in classifying the twitter sentiment. As well as the calculation of accuracy using the Confusion Matrix, there are as many as 1000 tweets result from crawling. This research resulted in a classification that uses the Vader Lexicon Library built by NLTK, the Naïve Bayes method and Support Vector Machine (SVM) has not yet reached an accuracy rate of 70%. In contrast, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) method that uses the Vader Lexicon Library from VaderSentiment achieves an accuracy rate of 90%, with a ratio of 90:10 (training data: test data).


Keywords: LPDP, Naïve Bayes, Sentiment Analysis, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Vader Lexicon.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bagaskoro, S. A., Hasanah, A., Bahri, S., Utami, E., & Yaqin, A. (2023). Analisis Sentimen LPDP (Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan) Menggunakan SVM dan Naïve Bayes Pada Media Sosial Twitter. Pseudocode, 10(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.33369/pseudocode.10.2.65-73

References

  1. R. Sulbakti, Jamu LPDP: Jurus Ampuh Dapet Beasiswa LPDP. 2013.
  2. H. A. Santoso, E. H. Rachmawanto, A. Nugraha, A. A. Nugroho, D. R. I. M. Setiadi, and R. S. Basuki, “Hoax classification and sentiment analysis of Indonesian news using Naive Bayes optimization,” Telkomnika (Telecommunication Comput. Electron. Control., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 799–806, 2020, doi: 10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.V18I2.14744.
  3. P. Arsi and R. Waluyo, “Analisis Sentimen Wacana Pemindahan Ibu Kota Indonesia Menggunakan Algoritma Support Vector Machine (SVM),” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 147, 2021, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.0813944.
  4. S. S. Aljameel et al., “A sentiment analysis approach to predict an individual’s awareness of the precautionary procedures to prevent covid-19 outbreaks in Saudi Arabia,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010218.
  5. A. Rifa’i, H. Sujaini, and D. Prawira, “Sentiment Analysis Objek Wisata Kalimantan Barat Pada Google Maps Menggunakan Metode Naive Bayes,” J. Edukasi dan Penelit. Inform., vol. 7, no. 3, p. 400, 2021, doi: 10.26418/jp.v7i3.48132.
  6. K. Arun and A. Srinagesh, “Multi-lingual Twitter sentiment analysis using machine learning,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 5992–6000, 2020, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v10i6.pp5992-6000.
  7. A. K. Fauziyyah, “Analisis Sentimen Pandemi Covid19 Pada Streaming Twitter Dengan Text Mining Python,” J. Ilm. SINUS, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 31, 2020, doi: 10.30646/sinus.v18i2.491.
  8. N. M. A. J. Astari, Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana, and Gede Indrawan, “Analisis Sentimen Dokumen Twitter Mengenai Dampak Virus Corona Menggunakan Metode Naive Bayes Classifier,” J. Sist. dan Inform., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 27–29, 2020, doi: 10.30864/jsi.v15i1.332.
  9. A. Anggrawan and A. -, “Aplikasi Deteksi Kemiripan Tugas Paper,” J. Matrik, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 5, 2017, doi: 10.30812/matrik.v15i2.39.
  10. H. Raza, M. Faizan, A. Hamza, A. Mushtaq, and N. Akhtar, “Scientific text sentiment analysis using machine learning techniques,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 157–165, 2019, doi: 10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0101222.
  11. A. Alsaeedi and M. Z. Khan, “A study on sentiment analysis techniques of Twitter data,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 361–374, 2019, doi: 10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100248.
  12. P. Mayadewi and E. Rosely, “Prediksi Nilai Proyek Akhir Mahasiswa Menggunakan Algoritma Klasifikasi Data Mining,” Semin. Nas. Sist. Inf. Indones., no. November, pp. 329–334, 2015.
  13. M. Azhari, Z. Situmorang, and R. Rosnelly, “Perbandingan Akurasi, Recall, dan Presisi Klasifikasi pada Algoritma C4.5, Random Forest, SVM dan Naive Bayes,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 640, 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i2.2937.
  14. S. Khomsah and Agus Sasmito Aribowo, “Text-Preprocessing Model Youtube Comments in Indonesian,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 648–654, 2020, doi: 10.29207/resti.v4i4.2035.
  15. A. Ristya, C. Chien, and A. Achmad, “Social media sentiment analysis to monitor the performance of vaccination coverage during the early phase of the national COVID-19 vaccine rollout,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 221, p. 106838, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106838.