Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penyelesaian sengketa merek berdasarkan kesamaan dan menganalisis akibat hukum dari putusan Mahkamah Agung 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN Niaga Sby. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif-yuridis dan menggunakan teknik analisis data kualitatif untuk menginterpretasikan temuan penelitian berdasarkan data penelitian dan implikasi yang diperoleh dari literatur, peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen, buku, dan bahan pustaka lain yang relevan, serta pertanyaan penelitian penulis. Temuan tersebut menjelaskan bahwa suatu merek dapat dikatakan memiliki kesamaan prinsip dengan merek lain ketika masyarakat umum tidak dapat dibedakan karena kesamaan dalam penampilan, huruf, angka, warna, bau dan pengucapan. Persamaan merek pada dasarnya memiliki hubungan yang sangat erat dengan kedengkian. Lindungi merek dari pelaku bisnis yang secara inheren egaliter dan jahat. Maraknya sengketa merek di Indonesia, dalam proses pendaftaran merek, Indonesia menerapkan prinsip first to file, yaitu pendaftaran merek hanya diberikan kepada pelaku usaha yang pertama kali mendaftarkan mereknya, dan negara tidak mendaftarkan/ Menyetujui pendaftaran merek dagang yang serupa dengan merek dagang terdaftar pertama kepada orang lain. Pada produk/jasa lain yang sejenis.
Rincian Artikel
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Sifa Fauziah Sifa, Rani Apriani
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Cara Mengutip
Sifa, S. F. (2024). Consequences And Resolutions Of The Ms Glow Vs Ps Glow Trade Brand Dispute: Study Of Decision Number 2/Pdt.Sus.Hki/Merek/2022/Pn Niaga Sby Jo. MA Decision Number 161 K/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2023. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 33(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.33.1.54-64
Referensi
-
Alamsyah, Azzahra, Dina Nurdiana, Fira Nur Januarizky. 2023. Ms. Glow Strategy After Ps Glow Lawsuit Regarding Trademarks. EDUCATIONIST: Journal of Educational and Cultural Studies. Volume 1 No 3.
Gautama, Sudargo. 1998. Indonesian Trademark Law, Bandung: Citra Aditya Baktry Gracia, Indiera Fortuna, Kurniawan, Eduardus Bayo Sili. 2023. Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Disputes Between PS Glow and MS Glow in View of Law No. 20 of 2016 Concerning Marks and Geographical Indications (Analysis of Decision of Case Number: 2/Pdt. Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN. Niaga Sby). International Journal of Social Science Research and Review. Volume 6 No 3.
Habiby, M. Yusuf, Kurniawan, Lalu Muhammad Hayyanul Haq. 2023. Systematic Settlement of Trademark Disputes Containing Similarities in Principal in Creating Business Certainty Based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Indonesia Berdaya. Volume 4 Number 3.
Hafizah, Haura Jauza and Rani Apriani. 2022. Settlement of Brand Dispute (Case Study of Pepsodent Strong us Formula Strong). Wajah Hukum, Volume 6 (2). Accessed in http://wajahhukum.unbari.ac.id/index.php/wjhkan/article/view/879/232
Hajuzi, Muhammad Ikbal. 2019. Thesis: Juridical Analysis of the Settlement of Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru Trademark Disputes (Case Study of Decision Number 104 PK/Pid.Sus/2015). Jakarta: Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University.
Joenata, Bagas Kristian, Dr. Hj. Rika Ratna Permata, Rai Mantili. 2024. Juridical Review of the Supreme Court Cassation Decision Number 161 K/PDT SUS- HKI/2023 Regarding Trademark Dispute between PS GLOW and MS GLOW Prosecutor: Journal of Legal and Political Science Studies. Volume 2 Number 1. Marcelina, Selly, Sujana Donandi. 2018. Dispute Settlement on The Ownership of Trademark With Similarity (Case Study Between Gudang Garam Vs Gudang Baru). President University: Legal Prolematics. Volume 3 Number 1.
Nadzifah, Zalfa Aliya and Maya Ruhtiani, Marlia Hafny Afrilies. 2023. Analysis of Decision Number 02/Pdt.sus HKI/Merek/2022/PN Niaga SHY on Trademark Disputes Between MS GLOW and PS GLOW in Relation to Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Lontar Merah. Volume 6 Number 2.
Supreme Court Decision Number: 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga Sby, dated July 7, 2022.
Riswandi, Budi Agus and Syamsudin. 2004. Intellectual Property Rights and Legal Culture, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 20 of 2016 on trademarks and geograplucal indications. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2016. State Secretariat. Jakarta.
Saidin. 2007. Legal aspects of intellectual property rights. Ed. Revised. Cet. 6. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Yuniarti, Retno. 2018. Juridical Analysis of Trademark Imitation Disputes (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 502 K/Pdt. Sus-HKI/2013). Scientific Journal Faculty of Law, University of Mataram.
Referensi
Alamsyah, Azzahra, Dina Nurdiana, Fira Nur Januarizky. 2023. Ms. Glow Strategy After Ps Glow Lawsuit Regarding Trademarks. EDUCATIONIST: Journal of Educational and Cultural Studies. Volume 1 No 3.
Gautama, Sudargo. 1998. Indonesian Trademark Law, Bandung: Citra Aditya Baktry Gracia, Indiera Fortuna, Kurniawan, Eduardus Bayo Sili. 2023. Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Disputes Between PS Glow and MS Glow in View of Law No. 20 of 2016 Concerning Marks and Geographical Indications (Analysis of Decision of Case Number: 2/Pdt. Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN. Niaga Sby). International Journal of Social Science Research and Review. Volume 6 No 3.
Habiby, M. Yusuf, Kurniawan, Lalu Muhammad Hayyanul Haq. 2023. Systematic Settlement of Trademark Disputes Containing Similarities in Principal in Creating Business Certainty Based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Indonesia Berdaya. Volume 4 Number 3.
Hafizah, Haura Jauza and Rani Apriani. 2022. Settlement of Brand Dispute (Case Study of Pepsodent Strong us Formula Strong). Wajah Hukum, Volume 6 (2). Accessed in http://wajahhukum.unbari.ac.id/index.php/wjhkan/article/view/879/232
Hajuzi, Muhammad Ikbal. 2019. Thesis: Juridical Analysis of the Settlement of Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru Trademark Disputes (Case Study of Decision Number 104 PK/Pid.Sus/2015). Jakarta: Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University.
Joenata, Bagas Kristian, Dr. Hj. Rika Ratna Permata, Rai Mantili. 2024. Juridical Review of the Supreme Court Cassation Decision Number 161 K/PDT SUS- HKI/2023 Regarding Trademark Dispute between PS GLOW and MS GLOW Prosecutor: Journal of Legal and Political Science Studies. Volume 2 Number 1. Marcelina, Selly, Sujana Donandi. 2018. Dispute Settlement on The Ownership of Trademark With Similarity (Case Study Between Gudang Garam Vs Gudang Baru). President University: Legal Prolematics. Volume 3 Number 1.
Nadzifah, Zalfa Aliya and Maya Ruhtiani, Marlia Hafny Afrilies. 2023. Analysis of Decision Number 02/Pdt.sus HKI/Merek/2022/PN Niaga SHY on Trademark Disputes Between MS GLOW and PS GLOW in Relation to Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Lontar Merah. Volume 6 Number 2.
Supreme Court Decision Number: 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga Sby, dated July 7, 2022.
Riswandi, Budi Agus and Syamsudin. 2004. Intellectual Property Rights and Legal Culture, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 20 of 2016 on trademarks and geograplucal indications. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2016. State Secretariat. Jakarta.
Saidin. 2007. Legal aspects of intellectual property rights. Ed. Revised. Cet. 6. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Yuniarti, Retno. 2018. Juridical Analysis of Trademark Imitation Disputes (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 502 K/Pdt. Sus-HKI/2013). Scientific Journal Faculty of Law, University of Mataram.
Gautama, Sudargo. 1998. Indonesian Trademark Law, Bandung: Citra Aditya Baktry Gracia, Indiera Fortuna, Kurniawan, Eduardus Bayo Sili. 2023. Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Disputes Between PS Glow and MS Glow in View of Law No. 20 of 2016 Concerning Marks and Geographical Indications (Analysis of Decision of Case Number: 2/Pdt. Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN. Niaga Sby). International Journal of Social Science Research and Review. Volume 6 No 3.
Habiby, M. Yusuf, Kurniawan, Lalu Muhammad Hayyanul Haq. 2023. Systematic Settlement of Trademark Disputes Containing Similarities in Principal in Creating Business Certainty Based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Indonesia Berdaya. Volume 4 Number 3.
Hafizah, Haura Jauza and Rani Apriani. 2022. Settlement of Brand Dispute (Case Study of Pepsodent Strong us Formula Strong). Wajah Hukum, Volume 6 (2). Accessed in http://wajahhukum.unbari.ac.id/index.php/wjhkan/article/view/879/232
Hajuzi, Muhammad Ikbal. 2019. Thesis: Juridical Analysis of the Settlement of Gudang Garam and Gudang Baru Trademark Disputes (Case Study of Decision Number 104 PK/Pid.Sus/2015). Jakarta: Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University.
Joenata, Bagas Kristian, Dr. Hj. Rika Ratna Permata, Rai Mantili. 2024. Juridical Review of the Supreme Court Cassation Decision Number 161 K/PDT SUS- HKI/2023 Regarding Trademark Dispute between PS GLOW and MS GLOW Prosecutor: Journal of Legal and Political Science Studies. Volume 2 Number 1. Marcelina, Selly, Sujana Donandi. 2018. Dispute Settlement on The Ownership of Trademark With Similarity (Case Study Between Gudang Garam Vs Gudang Baru). President University: Legal Prolematics. Volume 3 Number 1.
Nadzifah, Zalfa Aliya and Maya Ruhtiani, Marlia Hafny Afrilies. 2023. Analysis of Decision Number 02/Pdt.sus HKI/Merek/2022/PN Niaga SHY on Trademark Disputes Between MS GLOW and PS GLOW in Relation to Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Lontar Merah. Volume 6 Number 2.
Supreme Court Decision Number: 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga Sby, dated July 7, 2022.
Riswandi, Budi Agus and Syamsudin. 2004. Intellectual Property Rights and Legal Culture, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 20 of 2016 on trademarks and geograplucal indications. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2016. State Secretariat. Jakarta.
Saidin. 2007. Legal aspects of intellectual property rights. Ed. Revised. Cet. 6. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Yuniarti, Retno. 2018. Juridical Analysis of Trademark Imitation Disputes (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 502 K/Pdt. Sus-HKI/2013). Scientific Journal Faculty of Law, University of Mataram.