Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 25, 2023
Accepted
November 9, 2024
Published
December 18, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 90 Download : 24

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research examines the Authority of the Government in the Dissolution of Community Organizations. The purpose of the research is to find out the ratio legis of the regulation of the dissolution of community organizations without a judicial process and the dissolution of community organizations in a democratic perspective. This research is a type of normative juridical research using prescriptive analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that the ratio legis of the government dissolving community organizations is an affirmation of the principle of contrarius actus so that the government with its authority can dissolve community organizations without the need to wait and go through the judicial process (due process of law). And the dissolution of community organizations without a judicial process does not reflect a characteristic of a state of law based on democratic principles and ignores the constitutional rights of citizens to guarantee freedom of association, assembly and expression.

Keywords

Ratio Legis Contrarius actus Due Process of Law

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Agung Barok Pratama

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Pratama, A. B. (2024). Ratio of Legis Dissolution of Community Organizations Without Due Process Of Law. Supremasi Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 33(2), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.33.2.92-109
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Afif, Zaid. "The Concept of the Rule of Law State in Indonesia's Constitutional System." Pioneer Journal of LPPM Asahan University 2, no. 5 (2018).
  2. Amer, Nabih. "Analysis of the Dissolution of Community Organizations in the Perspective of the State of Law." Legality Journal 13, no. 01 (2020). https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v13i01.5417.
  3. Aswandi, Bobi, and Kholis Roisah. "The State Of Law And Pancasila Democracy In Relation To Human Rights (HAM)." Journal of Legal Development Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.128-145.
  4. Aziz, A. Saiful. "Reconceptualization Of The Interpretation Of The Principle Of Presumption Of Inncence." Iqtisad 4, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.31942/iq.v4i1.1998.
  5. Djafar, Wahyudi. "Reaffirming the Commitment of the Rule of Law: A Note on the Trend of the Rule of Law Deficit in Indonesia." Journal of Constitutional 7, no. 5 (2016): 151. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk757.
  6. Greenstein, Stanley. “Preserving the Rule of Law in the Era of Artificial Intelligence (AI).” Artificial Intelligence and Law 30, no. 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4.
  7. Herman, Herman, and Hendry Julian Noor. "The Doctrine Of The Legal Action Of The State Administration Makes Decisions (Beschikking)." Journal of Legal Communication (JKH) 3, no. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v3i1.9240.
  8. Hermawati, Istiana. "Criticism Of The Failure To Implement Development In Indonesia And Alternative Solutions." Sosio Informa 7, no. 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v7i2.905.
  9. Humaira, Annisa. "The Concept of a Democratic State." Reflection 3, no. 1 (2010).
  10. East Java, Moh. "Analysis Of The Dissolution Of Community Organizations In The Perspective Of The Principle Of Contrarius Actus In The State Of Law." Journal of Development Law Paradigm 6, no. 02 (2021). https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v6i02.2637.
  11. Junaidi, Veri, and Violla Reininda. "The relationship between the President and the House of Representatives in the formation of laws in the multiparty presidential government system." Journal of JENTERA 3, no. 1 (2020).
  12. Kahono, Sidik, Muhammad Junaidi, and A Heru Nuswanto. "Juridical Review of the Provisions of the Contrius Actus Principle According to Law Number 16 of 2017 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2017 concerning Amendments to Law Number 17 of 2013 concerning Organization." Semarang Law Review (SLR) 1, no. 1 (2022): 89. https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v1i1.2351.
  13. ———. "Juridical Review Of The Provisions Of The Principle Of Contrius Actus According To Law Number 16 Of 2017 Concerning The Stipilation Of Government Regulations In Lieu Of Law Number 2 Ofn 2017 Concerning Amendments To Law Number 17 Of 2013 Concerning Community Organizations." Semarang Law Review (SLR) 1, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v1i1.2351.
  14. Marfiando, Bayu. "The dissolution of Hizb ut-Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) is reviewed from the freedom of association." Journal of Police Science 14, no. 2 (2020): 13. https://doi.org/10.35879/jik.v14i2.253.
  15. Marolli. "The Government Issues Perppu No. 2/2017 concerning Amendments to the Law on Mass Organizations," 2017. https://www.kominfo.go.id/index.php/content/detail/10094/pemerintah-keluarkan-perppu-no-22017-tentang-perubahan-atas-undang-undang-ormas/0/artikel_gpr.
  16. Pranoto, Edi. "Socio-Legal Study Of The Ratification Of The Law On Community Organizations." Legal Spectrum 17, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.35973/sh.v17i1.1570.
  17. Pratama, Agung Baroque. "Measuring the Immunity of Perppu 1/2020 Implementing Officials with the Principle of Equality Before the Law." Rule of Law 17 (2021): 1–11.
  18. Qomar, Nurul et al. "The State of Law or State of Power (Rechtsstaat or Machtstaat)." 2018, no. 1 (2018).
  19. Ridlwan, Zulkarnain. "The Indonesian Legal State Is The Opposite Of Nachtwachterstaat." Fiat Justisia: Journal of Legal Sciences 5, no. 2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v5no2.56.
  20. Rosana, Ellya. "A democratic and human rights state." Journal of Islamic Political Aspiration Binoculars 12, no. 1 (2016).
  21. Sarifuddin, Imam. "Juridical Review of the Dissolution of Mass Organizations in Law Number 16 of 2017 concerning Community Organizations in the Concept of the State of Law." Repository.Uinjkt.Ac.Id, 2019.
  22. Sukadi, Imam. "The Principle of Contrarius Actus as Government Control of Freedom of Association and Assembly in Indonesia." Mimbar Keadilan 12, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v12i2.2457.
  23. Supardi, and Andi Safriani. "Antinomy of the Contrarius Actus Principle with the Principle of Due Process of Law in the Dissolution of Community Organizations Without Going Through the Court Process." Alauddin Law Development Journal 4, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v4i2.17217.
  24. Thera, Rian. "Legal Analysis of the Solidarity Action of Islamic Defenders Front Community Organizations in Makassar Reviewed from Law Number 8 of 1985 Juncto Law Number 17 of 2013 concerning Community Organizations." Student Scientific Journal of the University of Surabaya 3, no. 1 (2014): 1–15. https://journal.ubaya.ac.id/index.php/jimus/article/view/1757.
  25. Winata, Muhammad Reza. "Politics, Law and Constitutionality of the Authority to Dissolve Legal Entity Community Organizations by the Government." De Jure Legal Research Journal 18, no. 4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.v18.445-464.
  26. Yonnawati, Yonnawati. "Enforcement Of Administrative Sanctions Against Licensing Violatoons." Malahayati Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.33024/jhm.v3i1.7132.
  27. Yuslim. Procedural Law of the State Administrative Court. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.