Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to elaborate on the reasons for the contradictions in legal arrangements regarding confiscation of assets owned by regional companies and how the legal arrangements for confiscation of assets owned by regional companies should be. This research is a type of juridical-normative research. The primary legal materials used are the State Finance Law, the State Treasury Law and the Regional Government Law and PP BUMD. Coupled with Law no. 5 of 1962 concerning regional companies. The research was conducted by inventorying regulations relating to BUMD in the form of regional companies. Legal materials that have been inventoried are then analyzed using the prescription method. The results showed that the contradiction in the regulation of conflict of assets of regional companies boils down to the use of the term regional company in the State Finance Law. The conceptual reference to regional companies in Law No. 5 of 1962 is no longer in line with the form of regional companies that have been transformed into BUMD based on the Regional Government Law and PP BUMD. Thus, Article 50 of the State Treasury Law does not apply to assets that are separated and managed independently by regional companies. In addition, the regulation on configuration of assets of regional companies must begin with an amendment to the State Finance Law, followed by the State Treasury Law. Regulations on the confiscation of assets of regional companies must be carried out to provide justice for every legal entity and the wealth of private legal entities in Indonesia.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Iswan, M., Sari, N., & Ghafur, J. (2024). Contradictions In The Confidential Arrangement Of Assets Owned By BUMD In The Form Of A Regional Company. Supremasi Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 33(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.34.1.35-53

References

  1. Anggara, Sahya. Administrasi Keuangan Negara. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2016.
  2. Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. 7th ed. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo , 2015.
  3. Dewi, Sandra. Aspek Hukum Perseroan Terbatas. Solok: Insan Cendekia Mandiri, 2021.
  4. Dzulfikri Rizki, Muhammad, Kholis Roisah, and Nanik Trihastuti. “Pertanggungjawaban Negara Atas Acta Jure Imerij Perusahaan Yang Didiuga BUMN (Studi Terhadap Kasus Emilio Agustin Maffezini V. Kingdom of Spain).” Diponegoro Law Journal 10, no. 1 (2021): 108–23.
  5. Efendi, A’an, and Dyah Ochtorina Susanti. Logika Dan Argumentasi Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.
  6. Efridha, Nurul, Bismar Nasution, Faisal Akbar Nasution, and Mahmud Mulyadi. “Analisis Akibat Hukum Kekayaan Daerah Yang Dipisahkan Pada Badan Usaha Milik Daerah (BUMD) Dikaitkan Dengan Kebijakan Direksi Dalam Kegiatan Bisnis.” Recht Studiosum Law Review 2, no. 1 (May 31, 2023): 129–40. https://doi.org/10.32734/rslr.v2i1.12114.
  7. Halilah, Siti, and Mhd. Fakhrurrahman. “Asas Kepastian Hukum Menurut Para Ahli.” Siyasah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara 4, no. II (2021): 56–65.
  8. Hardjaloka, Loura. “Ketidakcermatan Hakim Berujung Pada Disparitas Putusan (Kajian Atas Berbagai Putusan Pengadilan Terakit Permohonan Pailit Terhadap BUMN).” Jurnal Yudisial 9, no. 1 (2016): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v9i1.28.
  9. Julyanto, Mario, and Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Huum.” Crepido 1, no. 1 (2019): 13–22.
  10. Khairandy, Ridwan. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Dagang Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2013.
  11. Lutfi Chakim, M. “Jure Imperii Dan Jure Gestionis.” Konstitusi, Jakarta, February 2017.
  12. Marzuki, Suparman. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum . Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2022.
  13. Mas, Marwan. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum . 2nd ed. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2011.
  14. Mulia Hasibuan, Batara. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Perdagangan Internasional.” https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2017/04/27/penyelesaian-sengketa-dalam-perdagangan-internasional/#:~:text=Jure%20gestiones%2C%20yaitu%20tindakan%2Dtindakan,arbitrase%2C%20dan%20lain%2Dlain, April 2017
  15. Paputungan, Merdiansa. “Diskursus Kewenangan Audit BPK Terhadap Keuangan BUMN (Perseroan) Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 62/Puu-Xi/2013.” Mimbar Hukum 29, no. 3 (2017): 430–44.
  16. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 54 Tahun 2017 Tentang BUMD
  17. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 12 Tahun 2019 Tentang Keuangan Daerah
  18. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 48/PUU-IX/2013
  19. Solihin, Dadang. Keuangan Publik: Pendanaan Pusat Dan Daerah. Jakarta: Artifa Duta Perkasa, 2006.
  20. Suariyanti Laksmi, N. L. G. S., and Ni Luh Gede Astariyani. “Upaya Debitor Untuk Menghindari Kepailitan.” Badung: Hukum Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 2018.
  21. Sumadiyono, Sigit. “Konstruksi Yuridis Badan Usaha Milik Daerah Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.” Legalitas X, no. 1 (2018): 1–8.
  22. Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung, nomor 7 tahun 2012 tentang rumusan umum hasil rapat pleno Mahkamah Agung sebagai pedoman pelaksanaan tugas bagi pengadilan, angka I (g) dan X;
  23. Tami, Rusli. Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Lampung: UBL Press, 2017.
  24. Tanya, Bernard L., Yoan M. Simanjuntak, and Markus Y. Hage. Teori Hukum; Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang Dan Generasi. Revisi. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2013
  25. Undang-undang No. 5 Tahun 1962 Tentang Perusahaan Daerah
  26. Undang-undang No. 17 Tahun 2003 Tentang Keuangan Negara
  27. Undang-undang No. 1 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perbendaharaan Negara
  28. Undang-undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas
  29. Undang-undang No. 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah
  30. Yuheslon. Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Gorontalo: Ideas Publishing, 2019.