Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 18, 2023
Accepted
December 30, 2024
Published
December 31, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 98 Download : 106

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Corruption is a significant issue plaguing society, with detrimental consequences for national development. It involves the abuse of authority and public trust for personal gain or the interests of specific groups, adversely affecting the government, private sector, non-governmental sectors, and society at large. This research aims to conduct a multi-dimensional analysis of anti-corruption policies implemented in the Head of Village Banjar Sari Lombok region and their resulting impacts. The study encompasses various strategies, including legal aspects, combating corruption in the public sector, preventive measures, anti-corruption education, and community involvement. Additionally, the research investigates how anti-corruption policies have affected various aspects of social, economic, and political life in the Head of Village Banjar Sari Lombok. The research methodology includes a literature review, framework development, data collection, analysis, case studies, impact assessment, recommendations, and validation. This methodology provides comprehensive insights into the efforts against corruption and the effectiveness of anti-corruption policies in the Head of Village Banjar Sari Lombok. Research findings demonstrate that anti-corruption policies have resulted in positive changes in governance, enhancing transparency, accountability, and public awareness of corruption risks. These impacts also extend to the economic realm, reducing economic losses due to corrupt practices. Therefore, efforts to combat corruption in the Head of Village Banjar Sari Lombok must be continually strengthened and improved to ensure a cleaner society and a more advanced community.


 

Keywords

Corruption; Anti-corruption policies; Social impact; Policy effectiveness; Criminal offenses

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Nadia Adinda Kezia Panjaitan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Panjaitan, N. A. K. (2024). Strategi dalam Memerangi Korupsi: Analisis Multi-Dimensi terhadap Kebijakan Anti-Korupsi dan Dampaknya : (Studi Kasus Kepala Desa Banjar Sari Lombok). Supremasi Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 33(2), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.33.2.137-161
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Antikorupsi, P. E. (2022, 05 10). Kenali Dasar Hukum Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Retrieved from Pusat Edukasi Antikorupsi: https://aclc.kpk.go.id/aksi-informasi/Eksplorasi/20220510-kenali-dasar-hukum-pemberantasan-tindak-pidana-korupsi-di-indonesia
  2. Antikorupsi, P. E. (2022). Tiga Indikator Keberhasilan Pemberantasan Korupsi. Pusat Edukasi Antikorupsi, https://aclc.kpk.go.id/aksi-informasi/Eksplorasi/20220522-tiga-indikator-keberhasilan-pemberantasan-korupsi.
  3. BPK. (2020, 04 19). PERAN BPK DALAM PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI. Retrieved from Ruang Edukasi: https://www.bpk.go.id/news/peran-bpk-dalam-pemberantasan-korupsi
  4. Finaka, A. W. (2019). Kenali Lembaga Anti Korupsi di Indonesia. Retrieved from Indonesia Baik: https://indonesiabaik.id/infografis/kenali-lembaga-anti-korupsi-di-indonesia
  5. Fischer, F., Miller, G. J., & Sidney, M. S. (2005). Handbook of Public Policy Analysis Theory, Politics, and Methods. Broken Sound Parkway: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
  6. Fjeldstad, O.-H., & Isaksen, J. (2008). Anti-Corruption Reforms: Challenges, Effects and Limits of World Bank Support. Washington: The World Bank Independen Evaluation Group (IEG).
  7. Goldsmith, L. J. (2021). Using Framework Analysis in Applied Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 2061-2076.
  8. Lubis, M. M. (2022, 08 16). Jika Polisi Korupsi, Lembaga Apa yang Berwenang Menangani Kasusnya? Retrieved from HukumOnline.com: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/polisi-korupsi-lt50269adb024b6
  9. MA. (2021, 11 11). Direktori Keputusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Retrieved from PUTUSAN PT MATARAM 11/PID.TPK/2021/PT MTR: https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaec589d29e4383a8960313030373337.html
  10. MA-RI. (2021). Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor : 11/PID.TPK/2021/PT MTR. Lombok: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
  11. Merkle, O. (2022). Anti-corruption and gender: the role of women’s political participation. United Kingdom: Westminster Foundation for Democracy.
  12. Natalia, D. L. (2019). Media Massa dan Pemberitaan Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 57-73.
  13. Prasetya, H. B., & Fuad, A. S. (2013). AKUNTABILITAS DAN TRANSPARANSI PUBLIK, SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN MENCEGAH DAN MEMBERANTAS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Recidive, 230-237.
  14. Rahman, H. (2022). REFORMASI BIROKRASI: KORUPSI DALAM BIROKRASI INDONESIA. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah, 135-161.
  15. Ramadhana, K., & Oktaryal, A. (2020). Laporan Penelitian Proyeksi Masa Depan Pemberantasan Korupsi Menelisik Pengesahan Revisi Undang-Undang KPK. Yogyakarta: Indonesia Corruption Watch. Retrieved from https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/proyeksi-masa-depan-pemberantasan-korupsi-menelisik-pengesahan-revisi-uu-kpk
  16. Riwukore, J. R., Manafe, H., Habaora, F., Susanto, Y., & Yustini, T. (2020). Strategi Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Korupsi. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 229-242.
  17. Ruswan, H. (2020, 03 06). Pengaduan Pelayanan Publik Wujud Partisipasi Masyarakat. Retrieved from Ombudsman Republik Indonesia: https://ombudsman.go.id/artikel/r/artikel--pengaduan-pelayanan-publik-wujud-partisipasi-masyarakat
  18. Saragih, Y. M., & Medaline, O. (2018). Elements of the corruption crime (element analysis of authority abuse and self-enrich and corporations in Indonesia). IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1-7.
  19. Satria, H. (2020). Kebijakan Kriminal Pencegahan Korupsi Pelayanan Publik. INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 169-186.
  20. Setiadi, W. (2018). KORUPSI DI INDONESIA (Penyebab, Bahaya, Hambatan dan Upaya Pemberantasan, Serta Regulasi). Jurnal LEGISLASI INDONESIA, 249-262.
  21. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 333-339.
  22. Sumadi, B. K. (2023, 08 24). Tingkatkan Kesadaran Antikorupsi Sejak Dini, Kemenhub Menyempurnakan Kurikulum Pendidikan Antikorupsi. Retrieved from Kementrian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia: https://dephub.go.id/post/read/tingkatkan-kesadaran-antikorupsi-sejak-dini,-kemenhub-menyempurnakan-kurikulum-pendidikan-antikorupsi
  23. Suraji. (2008). Sejarah Panjang Korupsi di Indonesia & Upaya Pemberantasannya. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Administrasi Publik, 135-148.
  24. Suyatmiko, W. H., & Nicola, A. (2019). Menakar Lembaga Antikorupsi: Studi Peninjauan Kinerja Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Antikorupsi INTEGRITAS, 35-56.
  25. Taherdoost, H. (2021). 2019) Data Collection Methods and Tools for Research; A Step-by-Step Guide to Choose Data Collection Technique for Academic and Business Research Projects. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 10-38.
  26. Waani, D. H. (2015). KEWENANGAN DAN PERANAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM PENYIDIKAN DAN PENUNTUTAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI. Lex Crimen, 74-80.
  27. Wahid, F., Jamil, A., Riyadi, E., Wibowo, A., & Ali, M. (2019). PUTUSAN Nomor 70/PUU-XVII/2019 DEMI KEADILAN BERDASARKAN KETUHANAN YANG MAHA ESA MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI REPUBLIK INDONESIA. Jakarta.
  28. Wardiana, W. (2023, 10 08). Pusat Edukasi Antikorupsi. Retrieved from Beberapa Kasus Korupsi di DPR dan Dampaknya: https://aclc.kpk.go.id/aksi-informasi/Eksplorasi/20231008-beberapa-kasus-korupsi-di-dpr-dan-dampaknya
  29. WBG. (2020). Enhancing Government Effectiveness and Transparency The Fight Against Corruption. Kuala Lumpur: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.