Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 1, 2025
Accepted
November 19, 2025
Published
November 19, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The rise of online gambling in Indonesia has created serious family and legal problems. When husbands become addicted, financial neglect, debt accumulation, and domestic conflict often lead to divorce, leaving women as the most affected group. This study analyzes legal certainty and women’s protection in divorce cases caused by online gambling from both Islamic and positive law perspectives. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the research examines relevant laws and Religious Court decisions in Bengkulu. The results show that legal certainty is guaranteed through consistent court procedures and statutory frameworks such as the Marriage Law, Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975, the Compilation of Islamic Law, and the ITE Law, which classify gambling as a legitimate ground for divorce. Women’s protection is realized through iddah maintenance, mut’ah, custody rights, and division of joint property. This study’s novelty lies in integrating Islamic and national law analyses to reveal how legal certainty principles are operationalized in court practice to ensure substantive justice for women affected by online gambling–related divorces.

Keywords

Legal Certainty Women’s Protection Divorce Online Gambling Islamic Law and Positive Law

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Fakhriyah Annisa Afroo, Wevy Efticha Sary

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Fakhriyah Annisa Afroo, & Wevy Efticha Sary. (2025). Divorce Due to Online Gambling in Indonesian Religious Courts: Legal Certainty and Women’s Protection in Islamic and Positive Law . Supremasi Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 34(2), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.33369/jsh.34.2.137-159
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdul Manan. Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata Di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Kencana, 2018.
  2. Abdurrahman. Kompilasi Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo, 2021.
  3. Al-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Fiqh Islam Wa Adillatuhu, Terjemahan. Edited by Abdul Hayyie al-Kattani dkk. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2011.
  4. Alamsyah, Oleh Johan. “Sinkronisasi Hukum Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam Mengenai Ketentuan Murtad Sebagai Alasan Perceraian.” Yurisprudentia 1, no. 2 (2015): 62–81.
  5. Anggi Muliawati. “Kapolri Ungkap 1.918 Tersangka Judi Online Dijerat Sepanjang 2024.” CNN, 2024. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20241114163300-12-1166671/pemain-judi-online-di-indonesia-capai-88-juta-mayoritas-anak-muda.
  6. Ariba Birkah, and Hening Hapsari Setyorini. “Analisis Yuridis Pasal 39 Ayat 2 UU Perkawinan Tentang Pelaksanaan Perceraian Diluar Persetujuan Satu Pihak Pasangan.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik 5, no. 1 (2024): 383–94. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.3128.
  7. Asman, Asman. “Dampak Negatif Judi Online Terhadap Keharmonisan Rumah Tangga Perspektif Hukum Keluarga Islam.” Ahlika: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 1, no. 1 (2024): 11–35. https://doi.org/10.70742/ahlika.v1i1.13.
  8. Ayun, Fitha, Lutvia Nitha, Ali Masyhar, Achmad Cholidin, M Ridho Ilahi, and Amalina Zukhrufatul Bahriyah. “Optimalisasi Implementasi UU TKPS: Tantangan Dan Solusi Dalam Upaya Penghapusan Kekerasan Seksual Di Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 53, no. 1 (2024): 90–100.
  9. Azka Syakira, Nafis, Naila Fathma Ramadhahana, Nayla Devi Anggita, Tazkia Tsaqifa, and Rystia Naila Husna. “Dampak Konsumerisme Berupa Judi Online Di Indonesia: Perspektif Ekonomi, Sosial, Dan Mental.” Jurnal Interaktif 16, no. 2 (2024): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.interaktif.2024.016.02.3.
  10. Fiantika Rita Feny, MWasil Mohammad, Jumiyati Sri, Honesti Leli, Wahyuni Sri, Mouw Erland. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Rake Sarasin, 2022.
  11. Hamdi, Z U L, Bakri Tanjung, Program Studi, Ahwal Syakhsiyyah, Fakultas Syariah, D A N Hukum, Universitas Islam Negri, and Syarif Hidayatullah. “Tinjauan Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Harta Waris Anak Angkat.” Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 5, no. 1 (2025).
  12. Hartini. “Cerai Talak Suami Non-Muslim Di Pengadilan Agama.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 21, no. 1 (2012): 127. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16250.
  13. Himmah, Atikatul, and Kalijunjung Hasibuan. “The Right to File for Divorce for Men and Women : Perspective of the Marriage Law and Compilation.” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 7, no. 11 (2024): 4096–4100. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i11.6359.
  14. Ibrahim, Ahmad Ridho, I Nurol Aen, Ah. Fathonih, Ahmad Hasan Ridwan, and Nandang Najmudin. “Asas Kepastian Hukum Keadilan Kemanfaatan Serta Penerapannya Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tentang Hak-Hak Anak Akibat Perceraian.” Equality: Journal of Islamic Law (EJIL) 1, no. 1 (2023): 39–58. https://doi.org/10.15575/ejil.v1i1.482.
  15. Julyano, Mario. Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Perspektif Positivisme. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2022.
  16. Mamudji, Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2019.
  17. Marbun, Eldbert Christanto Anya. “Mengkaji Kepastian Hukum Dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investasi Di Indonesia Melalui Lembaga Perizinan Online Single ….” Dharmasisya: Jurnal Program Magister Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia 1, no. 3 (2021): 1749–60.
  18. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.
  19. Muchsin. “Perlindungan Dan Kepastian Hukum.” Universitas Sebelas Maret 53 (2013): 135–44.
  20. Negara Republik Indonesia. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia No 16 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia § (2019). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/122740/uu-no-16-tahun-2019.
  21. Pengadilan Agama Bengkulu. “Putusan No. 481/Pdt.G/2025/PA.Bn,” 2025.
  22. ———. “Putusan Nomor 0029/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Bn,” 2022.
  23. PPATK. “Laporan Tahunan PPATK Tahun 2024.” Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK)., 2025. https://www.ppatk.go.id/publikasi/read/255/laporan-tahunan-ppatk-tahun-2024.
  24. Radbruch, Gustav. Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2019.
  25. Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2019.
  26. RI, Departemen Agama. “Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahannya.” Jakarta: Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an, 2019.
  27. RI, Komisi Yudisial. Problematika Hukum Dan Peradilan Di Indonesia, 2014.
  28. RI, Presiden. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 1 Tahun 1975, PP Republik Indonesia § (2014).
  29. Rofiq, Ahmad. Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2019.
  30. Saputra, Alhan Ramadhan, Mustopa, Melinda, and Sarlince Tamo Ina. “Analisis Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Berdasarkan Teori Formil.” Jurnal IKAMAKUM 2, no. 2 (2022): 791–95.
  31. Sriyana, Sriyana. “Judi Online: Dampak Sosial, Ekonomi, Dan Psikologis Di Era Digital.” Jurnal Sociopolitico 7, no. 1 (2025): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.54683/sociopolitico.v7i1.169.
  32. Syarifuddin, Amir. Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia: Antara Fiqh Munakahat Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2020.
  33. ———. Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.
  34. Tina Marlina, Montisa Mariana, and Irma Maulida. Undang-Undang Nomer 23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga, 5 Abdimas Awang Long § (2022). https://doi.org/10.56301/awal.v5i1.442.
  35. Utrecht. Pengantar Dalam Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia, 2020.