Main Article Content


Soil water availability to the plants is a very important physical property of soil that controls water and nutrient absorption by the plant.  It is defined as the difference between the maximum amount of water the soil can hold and the minimum condition that the plant can no longer extract water from the soil.  However, soil factors that control the plant available water content (PAWC) in the soil have not been fully understood.  The present study aims to analyze the relations between particle-size distributions and organic carbon with the available water of the soil and to develop a model of predicting PAWC.  Five soil profiles at different land units were described up to the depth of 100 cm.  Ten undisturbed soil samples were taken using the stainless-made core sampler from 10 cm increments for the soil water holding capacity analysis.  A similar number of disturbed samples were also provided from the same depths for soil texture and organic carbon analysis.  Results showed that the variance in PAWC could be explained by sand and clay fractions (R2>0.35) but not by silt and organic carbon contents.  Therefore, we were able to develop a model for the prediction of available water content in the soil from the sand and clay parameters.  The model will help decision-makers be able to propose conservation and management strategies for PAWC in agricultural practices as well as for the soil moisture retention at civil works.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hermawan, B., Hasaanudin, H., Agustian, I., & Murcitro, B. G. (2020). A Model to Predict Plant-available Water Content of Soils at Different Land Units in Bengkulu, Indonesia. TERRA : Journal of Land Restoration, 3(1), 10–14. Retrieved from


  1. Al-Khafaf, S., Al-Awad, M.C.& Adnan, A. (1988). A model for predicting crop yield from threshold limits of available soil water. Journal of Agriculture and Water Resources Research. Soil and Water Resources (Iraq), 7(1), 33-46.
  2. Blaschek, M., Roudier, P., Poggio, M. & Hedley, C.B. (2019). Prediction of soil available water-holding capacity from visible near-infrared reflectance spectra. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1-10.
  3. Chertkov, V.Y. (2010). Water retention of rigid soils from a two-factor model for clay. The Open Transport Phenomena Journal, 2, 90-102.
  4. De Paepe, J.L., Angel Bono, A. & Alvarez, R. (2018). Simple estimation of available water capacity in soils of semiarid and subhumid environments. Arid Land Research & Management, 32(2),133. 128104166&site =eds- live. Accessed March 25, 2020.
  5. Hermawan, B., Suparjo, E., Hindarto, K.S., Silalahi, R. & Barchia, F. (2017). A quick dielectric method to determine in-situ soil water content for precision water use under sustainable agricultural practices. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology, 7(3), 910-915.
  6. Hillel, D. (1980). Introduction to Soil Physics. Academic Press, Inc., London, Toronto, 364 pp.
  7. Li, D., G. Gao, Shao, M. & Fu, Bojie. (2016). Predicting available water of soil from particle-size distribution and bulk density in an oasis–desert transect in northwestern China. Journal of Hydrology, 538, 539-550.
  8. Littke, K.M., Zabowski, D., Turnblom, E. & Harrison, R.B. (2018). Estimating shallow soil available water supply for Douglas-fir forests of the coastal Pacific Northwest: climate change impacts. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 48(4), 421-430.
  9. Qiao, J., Y. Zhu, X. Jia, Huang, L. & Shao, M. (2019). Pedotransfer functions for estimating the field capacity and permanent wilting point in the critical zone of the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Soils & Sediments: Protection, Risk Assessment, & Remediation, 19(1), 140-147.
  10. Román Dobarco, M., Cousin, I., Le Bas, C. & Martin, M.P. (2019). Pedotransfer functions for predicting available water capacity in French soils, their applicability domain and associated uncertainty. Geoderma, 336, 81-95. DOI: http://10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.08.022.
  11. Rong, Y. (2012). Estimation of maize evapotranspiration and yield under different deficit irrigation on a sandy farmland in Northwest China. Afr. J. Agr. Res. 7, 4698–4707.
  12. Sadeghi, S.H., Ghaffari, G.A., Rangavar, A., Hazbavi, Z. & Sing, V.P. (2020). Spatio temporal distribution of soil moisture in gully facies. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 8(1), 15-25. DOI:
  13. Sani, M. & Alhassan, I. (2019). Influence of soil depth and texture on moisture characteristics and plant available water content of Alfisols in northern Guinea Savannah of Nigeria. Azarian Journal of Agriculture, 6(4), 80-85.
  14. Wang, L., Zhang, W. & Chen, F. (2019). Bayesian approach for predicting soil-water characteristic curve from particle-size distribution data. Energies, 12(15), 2992.
  15. Zartman, R. (2006). Soil Texture and Water Management. American Nurseryman, 203(5), 32-34.