Main Article Content

Abstract

The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) of the Republic of Indonesia is one of the pioneers on corruption practices combat in Indonesia. KPK is well known for its achievements in criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia, even though the regulations that discuss the Corruption Eradication Commission often becoming a debatable material by legal experts in Indonesia. The answer to this question can be done by conducting a comparative legal study. This comparative legal study was conducted to compare the corruption eradication system in Indonesia with corruption eradication agencies in other countries to find out what are the similarities and differences. This writing aims to see and analyze the similarities and differences between the Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission with the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau Singapura, Independent Commission Against Corruption Hongkong and Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia/ Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission.

Article Details

Author Biography

Rhendra Kusuma, Universitas Indonesia

Mahasiswa Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia
How to Cite
Kusuma, R. (2022). Perbandingan Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Indonesia dengan Lembaga Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Negara Singapura, Hong Kong dan Malaysia. University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 7(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.7.1.71-83

References

  1. Buku
  2. Black, Hendry Campbell, Black’s Law Dictionary, (St. Paul. Minn, : Publishing Co. Cetakan ke 11, tahun 1997).
  3. Carey, Peter dan Suhardiyoto Haryadi, Korupsi dalam Sejarah Indonesia, (Depok: Komunitas Bambu, 2016).
  4. CPIB, Corrupt Practices Investigastion Bureau, (Singapura: CPIB, 2012).
  5. Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Deputi Pencegahan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, Komisi Anti Korupsi di Luar Negeri (Deskripsi Singapura, Hongkong, Thailand, Madagascar, Zambia, Kenya, dan Tanzania), (Jakarta : KPK, 2006).
  6. Djamil, Fathurrahman dkk, “Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme (KKN): Dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Moral Islam”; dalam Menyingkap Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme di Indonesia. (Yogyakarta: Aditya Media, 1999).
  7. Legislative Assembly, Debates:Official Report, (Singapura: Report, 1960).
  8. Manion, Melanie, Corruption by Design: Building Clean Government in Mailand China and Hong Kong, (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2004).
  9. Marzuki, Peter Mahmud Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group. 2016).
  10. Ibrahim, Johny, Teori Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. (Malang: Banyu Media, 2008).
  11. Ngo, Tak-Wing, Hongkong’s History: State and Society Under Colonial Rule, (London: Routledge, 1999).
  12. Singapore, The Journey: 60 years of Fighting Corruption in Singapore/Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau, (Singapura : CPIB, 2012).
  13. Transparency International, Corruption Perception Index 2019, tahun 2020.
  14. Jurnal dan Makalah
  15. Carolina, Anita, Sistem Anti Korupsi: Suatu Studi Komparatif di Indonesia, Hongkong, Singapura dan Thailand, Jurnal InFestasi, Vol.8, No.1, Juni 2012, hlm.113.
  16. De Sousa, Luis, “Anti-Corruption Agencies: Between Empowerment and Irrelevance”, Crime Law Social Change. Vol. 53 (2010).
  17. Pohan, Sarmadan, Perbandingan Lembaga Anti Korupsi di Indonesia dengan Beberapa Negara di Dunia, Jurnal Justitia Vol. 1 No. 1, Agustus 2018.
  18. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  19. Hong Kong, Independent Commission Against Corruption
  20. Ordinance, ICAC Ordinance.
  21. Indonesia, Revisi Undang-Undang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak
  22. Pidana Korupsi, UU No. 19 tahun 2019, LN. NO.197 tahun 2019, TLN. NO. 6409.
  23. Indonesia, Undang-Undang tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, UU No. 21 Tahun 1999, LN No. 140 tahun 1999, TLN No.3874.
  24. Indonesia, Undang-Undang tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, UU No.30 tahun 2002, LN No. 137 Tahun 2002, TLN No.4250.
  25. Kantor Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa Urusan Narkoba dan Kejahatan, United Nations Convention Against Corruption, UNCAC (2003).
  26. Malaysia, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act, MACC Act 2008.
  27. Singapura, Prevention of Corruption Act, PCA 1993.
  28. Internet
  29. Eva Mazrieva, “Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia Naik, Bukti Keseriusan Pemberantasan Korupsi?”, https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-indonesia-naik-bukti-keseriusan-pemberantasan-korupsi-/4764712.html, diakses pada Senin, 9 April 2020.
  30. Nanda Febrianto, “ICAC Hongkong Berprestasi Hingga Difilmkan”, https://www.tagar.id/icac-kpk-hong-kong-berprestasi-hingga-difilmkan diakses 10 Mei 2020
  31. Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, s.v. “corrupt,”, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/corrupt diakses 5 Mei 2020
  32. Megawati dan KPK: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2015/01/29/14000001/Megawati.dan.KPK?page=all, diakses pada 10 Mei 2020.
  33. CPIB, “Roles & Functions”, https://www.cpib.gov.sg/about-cpib/roles-and-functions diakses 10 Mei 2020.
  34. CPIB, “Accolades & Achievements”, https://www.cpib.gov.sg/about-cpib/accolades-and-achievements diakses 10 Mei 2020.
  35. SPRM, “Organization”, https://www.sprm.gov.my/index.php/en/corporate-info/mengenai-sprm/organisation-info/organisation diakses 10 Mei 2020.
  36. Anti-Corruption Cleaning House, “Sejarah Panjang Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia”, https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/component/content/article?id=144:sejarah-panjang-pemberantasan-korupsi-di-indonesia diakses 14 April 2020.
  37. Muhammad Yasin, “Tim Gabungan yang Akhirnya dibubarkan”, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5da6ee2e3a49e/tim-gabungan-yang-akhirnya-dibubarkan?page=all diakses 15 April 2020
  38. Taufan Zasya, “Peringatan 20 Tahun Reformasi: Cara Soeharto Berantas Korupsi”, https://www.era.id/read/kGUWJO-peringatan-20-tahun-reformasi-cara-soeharto-berantas-korupsi diakses 14 April 2020.
  39. ICAC, “Brief History”, https://www.icac.org.hk/en/about/history/index.html diakses 12 Mei 2020.
  40. ICAC, “Understanding the Ordinance”, https://www.icac.org.hk/en/law/law/icaco/index.html diakses 12 Mei 2020.